3种化学指示卡对压力蒸汽灭菌监测效果的比较

发布时间：2018-06-16 01:10

本文选题：灭菌 + 监测　；参考：《中华医院感染学杂志》2014年03期

【摘要】：目的比较3种化学指示卡对压力蒸汽灭菌的监测效果,选择合适的化学监测方法,以提高化学监测结果判断率。方法选用3种不同材质的高压蒸汽灭菌化学指示卡,同时放置在敷料包、器械包和纸塑包内,完成一个灭菌周期后,取出化学指示卡肉眼裸视判断监测效果。结果 3M爬行式指示卡、MVI化学指示卡在敷料包、金属器械包和纸塑包合格率均为100.0%,3M压力蒸汽灭菌包内化学指示卡合格率分别为96.7%、53.3%和90.0%。结论 3M爬行式指示卡、MVI化学指示卡在灭菌过程不易受水分和接触物的影响,不需要做任何防护处理,使用方便,判读率高,3M压力蒸汽灭菌包内化学指示卡判读结果易受多因素影响,进行器械包内监测时宜做相应的防护措施减少误差。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the monitoring effect of three chemical indicator cards on autoclave sterilization and to select suitable chemical monitoring methods in order to improve the judging rate of chemical monitoring results. Methods three kinds of high pressure steam sterilization chemical indicator cards of different materials were selected and placed in dressing bag, instrument bag and paper plastic bag at the same time. After a sterilization cycle was completed, the chemical indicator card was taken out from naked eyes to judge the monitoring effect. Results the qualified rate of 3M crawling indicator card MVI chemical indicator card in dressing bag, metal instrument bag and paper plastic bag was 100.03% and 90.0% respectively. Conclusion the 3M crawling indicator card MVI chemical indicator card is not easy to be affected by moisture and contact materials during sterilization, so it does not need any protective treatment and is easy to use. The result of chemical indicator card interpretation in the sterilizing bag is easy to be affected by many factors, and the corresponding protective measures should be taken to reduce the error.
【作者单位】：南方医科大学附属深圳妇幼保健院消毒供应中心;
【基金】：广东省医学科研基金项目(A2012054)
【分类号】：R187

【参考文献】