男性农民工使用共用剃刀重复干预模式的建立及效果评估

发布时间：2019-02-21 14:40

【摘要】：目的研究建立男性农民工使用共用剃刀的重复干预模式,并评估干预效果。方法将423名男性农民工随机分成重复干预组、干预组和对照组。采用先填问卷后干预的模式,对3组人员进行不同程度的知识和行为干预,在45 d和90 d后回访,采用广义估计方程和χ2检验进行统计学分析。结果重复干预组、干预组和对照组收到的有效问卷分别为121、127和131份。比较前后2次回访结果,各组人员在理发店使用共用剃刀比例分别为:重复干预组30.6%和29.8%,干预组29.1%和44.1%,对照组46.6%和48.9%。重复干预组干预效果较另外2组有统计学意义。结论干预可减少研究对象使用共用剃刀,重复干预效果好于一般干预,更有利于促进男性农民工减少甚至拒绝使用共用剃刀。因此,重复干预模式的意义值得研究和探讨。
[Abstract]:Objective to establish the repeated intervention model of male migrant workers using common razor and evaluate the effect of intervention. Methods 423 male migrant workers were randomly divided into repeated intervention group, intervention group and control group. The questionnaire and intervention model were used to conduct different degrees of knowledge and behavior intervention in the three groups. After 45 days and 90 days, the statistical analysis was carried out with the generalized estimation equation and 蠂 2 test. Results the effective questionnaires of repeated intervention group, intervention group and control group were 121127 and 131respectively. The results showed that the rate of using common razor in the barber shop was 30.6% and 29.8in the repeated intervention group, 29.1% and 44.1% in the intervention group, 46.6% and 48.9% in the control group respectively. The intervention effect of repeated intervention group was significantly higher than that of the other two groups. Conclusion intervention can reduce the use of common razor, and repeated intervention is better than general intervention, and it is more helpful to promote male migrant workers to reduce or even refuse to use common razor. Therefore, the significance of repeated intervention model is worth studying and discussing.
【作者单位】：成都市血液中心;四川省什邡市职业中学;北京工业大学医院;
【基金】：四川省卫生厅2005年医学科研项目(050159)
【分类号】：R181.2

【参考文献】