当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 麻醉学论文 >

疝和腹壁外科微创手术新认识

发布时间:2018-03-08 05:04

  本文选题:微创 切入点:腹腔镜 出处:《中国实用外科杂志》2015年11期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:在疝和腹壁外科领域,腹腔镜疝修补手术是微创手术的概念受到了极大的挑战,而且此论点在腹股沟疝和腹壁切口疝的治疗上具有明显的不同。腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)仅应视为一种手术方法,而非微创手术。LIHR须采用全身麻醉,具有更多的分离、更复杂的操作、更长的手术时间,且严重并发症发生率更高;而开放手术可在局麻下实施,具有更少的分离、更简单的操作、更短的手术时间以及更低的严重并发症发生率。虽然LIHR术后病人相对能更早地恢复工作,术后慢性疼痛和切口感染发生率也相对更低,但其是微创手术的观点并未被广大医生所赞同。腹腔镜切口疝修补术(LIVH)已被证明是腹壁切口疝病人安全、有效及合理的选择。LIVH手术创伤小、手术时间短,术后疼痛轻、恢复快、复发率低,而且切口并发症和补片感染的发生率均很低,住院时间及恢复正常工作生活的时间均明显缩短,术后早期生活质量明显高于开放手术。LIVH应成为腹壁切口疝手术的首选。总之,腹腔镜手术在腹股沟疝修补手术中微创的优势不明显,甚至被认为创伤更大,但在腹壁切口疝及其他腹壁疝的治疗中优势巨大。
[Abstract]:In the field of herniation and abdominal wall surgery, the concept of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy as a minimally invasive surgery has been greatly challenged. And this argument is significantly different in the treatment of inguinal hernia and incisional hernia. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy (LIHRs) should only be considered as a surgical procedure, rather than minimally invasive surgery. LIHR should be treated with general anesthesia, with more separation. More complex operations, longer operating times, and higher incidence of serious complications; open surgery, which can be performed under local anesthesia, with fewer separations and simpler procedures, Shorter duration of surgery and lower incidence of severe complications. Although patients after LIHR return to work relatively early, the incidence of chronic pain and incision infection is also relatively low. However, the viewpoint of minimally invasive operation was not agreed by the majority of doctors. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair has been proved to be safe for patients with abdominal wall incisional hernia. The effective and reasonable choice of the operation is less trauma, shorter operation time, less postoperative pain and faster recovery. The recurrence rate was low, the incidence of incision complication and patch infection was very low, the time of hospitalization and the time of returning to normal working life were shortened obviously. The quality of life in early postoperative period was significantly higher than that in open operation. Liva should be the first choice of incisional hernia surgery. In a word, the advantage of laparoscopy in inguinal herniorrhaphy is not obvious, even it is considered to be more traumatic. But it has great advantages in the treatment of incisional hernia and other abdominal wall hernia.
【作者单位】: 复旦大学附属华东医院普外科;
【分类号】:R656.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 唐健雄;;重视腹壁疝规范化治疗[J];中国实用外科杂志;2014年05期

2 陈鑫;李健文;;从循证医学角度谈腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术20年进展[J];中国实用外科杂志;2014年05期

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 吴新财;王颖红;;高频彩超在腹壁疝中的应用价值[J];中国社区医师;2014年34期

2 黄耿文;;硬化剂注射失败的腹股沟疝患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗体会[J];中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版);2015年01期

3 苏明军;段大航;;医用胶在小儿外科的应用进展[J];中国现代药物应用;2015年09期

4 何文;杨柳;黄耿文;阳建怡;杨建红;谭丽;欧阳璐;孙佳;肖柔;罗慧娟;欧阳剑波;贺爱兰;李宜雄;;腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛调查[J];中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版);2015年05期

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李广永 ,周旭宇 ,李刚;腹壁切口疝80例原因分析及预防[J];人民军医;2003年04期

2 唐健雄,陈革,黄磊;开放式完全腹腔内修补治疗腹壁切口疝的方法及经验介绍[J];外科理论与实践;2004年04期

3 郑民华,毛志海;腹壁切口疝的腹腔镜修补术[J];临床外科杂志;2005年02期

4 熊先泽;程南生;彭其芳;易江;;巨大腹壁切口疝治疗体会(附11例临床分析)[J];华西医学;2006年02期

5 王新波;朱维铭;;腹壁切口疝的治疗进展[J];中国实用外科杂志;2006年11期

6 陈绪安;;腹壁切口疝20例手术治疗体会[J];山东医药;2007年21期

7 周建平;任峰;;腹壁切口疝的外科治疗[J];中国现代手术学杂志;2007年05期

8 刘强;包海燕;杨斌;;腹壁切口疝病因分析(附34例病例报告)[J];新疆医学;2008年12期

9 徐大华;刘家峰;刘东斌;刘强;王剑;;腹腔镜修补多发性腹壁切口疝[J];中国实用外科杂志;2008年12期

10 高铁民;;腹壁切口疝原因分析及处理[J];中国实用医药;2009年07期

相关会议论文 前7条

1 高国栋;王平;杨,

本文编号:1582488


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/1582488.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户31f1a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com