当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 麻醉学论文 >

右美托咪定预防儿童全麻苏醒期躁动和谵妄的安全有效剂量

发布时间:2018-04-15 08:22

  本文选题:右美托咪定 + 儿童 ; 参考:《广东医学》2017年11期


【摘要】:目的探讨右美托咪定预防儿童全麻苏醒期躁动和谵妄的安全有效剂量。方法选取择期行全麻下腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术的患儿120例,随机分为4组,A、B、C组患儿分别经静脉恒速(60 m L/h)泵注0.25、0.5和1μg/kg右美托咪定,D组(对照组)以相同的速度泵入生理盐水。对比4组患儿的5点评分量表评分和苏醒期谵妄(ED)和躁动(EA)发生率。比较4组患儿的儿童和婴儿术后疼痛评分(CHIPPS评分),记录七氟烷的用量及手术时间(TO),停止麻醉药物至拔喉罩时间(TM)、自主睁眼时间(TE),记录患儿在麻醉后监护室停留的时间(TP)。结果 4组患儿TO比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),其中B、C组TM显著高于A、D组(P0.05),C组显著高于B组(P0.05);其中A、B、D三组的TE和TP比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),C组TE显著高于A、B、D三组(P0.05);而C组TP显著高于A、D组(P0.05),而B、C两组的TP比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);A、B、C三组的5点评分量表评分、EA和ED发生率均显著低于D组(P0.05),3项指标中B、C组均显著低于A组(P0.05),B、C组之间差异无统计学意义(P0.05);A、B、C三组的CHIPPS评分和七氟烷的用量均显著低于D组(P0.05),而B、C组显著低于A组(P0.05),B、C组之间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论儿童全麻中使用右美托咪定0.5μg/kg的剂量可安全有效地预防患儿手术后苏醒期躁动和谵妄,能减少术中七氟烷用量及减轻术后疼痛。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the safe and effective dose of dexmetomidine in preventing restlessness and delirium during general anesthesia in children.Methods one hundred and twenty children undergoing laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac under general anesthesia were randomly divided into 4 groups: group A (n = 4) were injected intravenously with constant velocity of 60 mL / h and group D (n = 1 渭 g/kg) were pumped into normal saline at the same speed.The five-point rating scale (5-score) and the incidence of delirium (EDV) and restlessness (EAA) in the recovery period were compared among the 4 groups.The postoperative pain scores of children and infants in the four groups were compared, the dosage of sevoflurane and the time of operation were recorded, the time of stopping anaesthesia to larynx mask and the time of spontaneous eye opening were recorded, and the time of staying in the intensive care unit after anesthesia was recorded.Results there was no significant difference in to between the four groups, among which TM in group B was significantly higher than that in group B (P 0.05), and the te and TP in group A were significantly higher than that in group B (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in te and TP between group C and group C (P 0.05), but that in group C was significantly higher than that in group ABD (P 0.05), while in group B (P 0.05), there was no significant difference between group A (P 0.05) and group C (P 0.05), and there was no significant difference between group B (P 0.05) and group C (P 0.05).TP in group C was significantly higher than that in group A (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference in TP between the two groups. The scores of EA and Ed in group C were significantly lower than those in group D (P 0.05) and the incidence of Ed in group B was significantly lower than that in group A (P 0.05) and the incidence of Ed in group C was significantly lower than that in group A (P 0.05) and the incidence of Ed in group C was significantly lower than that in group A (P 0.05) and the incidence of Ed in group C was significantly lower than that in group A (P 0.05).The CHIPPS score and sevoflurane dosage of P0.05An BHG C group were significantly lower than that of D group (P 0.05), while the BHG C group was significantly lower than that of A group (P 0.05) BHG group. There was no significant difference (P 0.05) between group A and group B (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between group A (P 0.05) and group A (P 0.05).Conclusion the dose of dexmetomidine 0.5 渭 g/kg in children with general anesthesia can prevent restlessness and delirium during postoperative recovery, reduce the dosage of sevoflurane during operation and relieve postoperative pain.
【作者单位】: 佛山市妇幼保健院麻醉科;佛山市妇幼保健院新生儿科;
【分类号】:R726.1

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李红燕,张爱丽;全麻苏醒期病人躁动的临床观察[J];河南职工医学院学报;2001年03期

2 吴晓燕,于洋;全麻苏醒期病人躁动的原因分析及预防[J];中原医刊;2002年03期

3 伍香陵;全麻苏醒期病人躁动的观察[J];中原医刊;2003年11期

4 梁瑞花,陈少娟,张坤全,张爱宁,张莹;老年患者全麻苏醒期的护理[J];齐齐哈尔医学院学报;2004年04期

5 程玲;吕红梅;;全麻苏醒期患者躁动原因分析及护理对策[J];现代医药卫生;2006年01期

6 刘明玲;;全麻苏醒期病人的护理[J];当代护士(学术版);2006年S1期

7 李晓娜;;全麻苏醒期病人烦躁原因分析及护理[J];医学理论与实践;2007年09期

8 周倩;;全麻苏醒期患者烦躁的原因分析与护理[J];华夏医学;2007年05期

9 李向荣;彭顺秀;覃丽华;李英姿;;全麻苏醒期患儿躁动危险因素探讨[J];护理学报;2007年12期

10 李宁;薛建军;;全麻苏醒期病人躁动情况观察[J];现代医院;2007年12期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 史东平;封卫征;鲍杨;;全麻苏醒期患者躁动的研究进展[A];2008年第七次华东六省一市麻醉学学术会议暨浙江省麻醉学术年会论文汇编(上册)[C];2008年

2 刘凤芹;梁改红;;全麻苏醒期的护理体会[A];中华护理学会第14届全国手术室护理学术交流会议论文汇编(下册)[C];2010年

3 王海棠;刘敬臣;;小儿全麻苏醒期躁动的原因及处理[A];2006年中华医学会全国麻醉学术年会知识更新讲座[C];2006年

4 罗宏;李军;连庆泉;;小儿全麻苏醒期躁动的防治进展[A];2014年全国小儿麻醉学术年会暨浙江省麻醉学学术年会论文集[C];2014年

5 徐培君;张丽青;;亲属陪伴对全麻苏醒期患儿躁动影响[A];创建患者安全文化——中华护理学会第15届全国手术室护理学术交流会议论文汇编(中册)[C];2011年

6 林素贤;;全麻苏醒期病人的应激反应及其护理对策[A];全国手术室护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2003年

7 张彩红;张虹;;全麻苏醒期病人低血氧饱和度原因分析及护理[A];全国口腔科护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2006年

8 王凌;;口腔科颌面外科全麻苏醒期的护理[A];2011年河南省五官科护理优质服务管理新工程与临床护理新技术交流会论文集[C];2011年

9 傅焕珍;史素丽;;小儿全麻苏醒期躁动的围麻醉期处理[A];2014年全国小儿麻醉学术年会暨浙江省麻醉学学术年会论文集[C];2014年

10 罗宏;李军;连庆泉;;临床麻醉与研究小儿全麻苏醒期躁动的防治进展[A];2009年浙江省麻醉学学术会议论文汇编[C];2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前6条

1 孙文文;全麻苏醒期患者重度躁动相关因素分析[D];大连医科大学;2012年

2 于丹;应用帕瑞昔布钠对OSAS患者在全麻苏醒期影响的临床观察[D];吉林大学;2013年

3 李仁虎;全麻患者苏醒期躁动原因分析及舒芬太尼对其影响[D];安徽医科大学;2011年

4 姜芸;帕瑞昔布钠联合地塞米松对全麻苏醒期不良反应的影响[D];新疆医科大学;2010年

5 朴连玉;右美托咪定及小剂量氯胺酮预防小儿全麻苏醒期躁动的对比观察[D];吉林大学;2014年

6 张慧;术前心理干预在全身麻醉中的应用研究[D];宁夏医科大学;2010年



本文编号:1753314

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/1753314.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户fd25f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com