舒芬太尼和瑞芬太尼在外科全身麻醉手术中应用效果的对比

发布时间：2018-04-16 15:34

本文选题：舒芬太尼 + 瑞芬太尼　；参考：《包头医学院学报》2016年05期

【摘要】：目的:探讨瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼在外科全身麻醉手术中的应用及临床效果对比。方法:选择2013年11月至2014年11月进行外科全身麻醉手术的患者162例作为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组81例,对照组患者使用舒芬太尼完成全身麻醉手术,观察组使用瑞芬太尼进行全身麻醉手术,观察对比两组患者术后生命体征情况、自主呼吸恢复时间、麻醉苏醒时间以及术后不良反应发生率等。结果:与对照组相比,观察组患者在全身麻醉手术后的自主呼吸恢复时间、麻醉苏醒时间短于对照组(P0.05);观察组的术后不良反应发生率也低于对照组(P0.05);两组患者术后生命体征情况对比,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:在临床全身麻醉手术中,瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼均有良好麻醉效果,但使用瑞芬太尼麻醉,患者术后恢复更快,且不良反应发生率更低,在临床上值得推广使用。
[Abstract]:Objective: To investigate the effects of remifentanil and sufentanil in general anesthesia surgery compared the application and clinical effect of surgery. Methods: from November 2013 to November 2014 for surgery in general anesthesia patients 162 cases as the research object, randomly divided into control group and observation group, 81 cases in each group, the control group of patients using sufentanil complete general anesthesia, the observation group used remifentanil for general anesthesia, observe two groups of patients with postoperative vital signs, respiratory recovery time, recovery time and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions. Results: compared with the control group, the observation group of patients in general anesthesia after the surgery recovery time of spontaneous breathing, anesthesia recovery time shorter than the control group (P0.05); adverse reactions in the observation group after the operation rate is lower than that of the control group (P0.05); comparison of vital signs after operation in the two groups, no statistical difference Significance (P0.05). Conclusion: in clinical anesthesia surgery, remifentanil and sufentanil has good anesthetic effect, but the use of remifentanil anesthesia, faster postoperative recovery, lower incidence of adverse reactions, worthy of promotion in clinical use.

【作者单位】：莒南县中医院;
【分类号】：R614.2

【相似文献】