当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 麻醉学论文 >

三种不同喉镜在腹部手术患者的气管插管中对血流动力学影响

发布时间:2018-05-07 01:04

  本文选题:可视喉镜 + 血流动力学 ; 参考:《延边大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的:分析可视喉镜、纤支镜和直接喉镜在气管插管中对血流动力学影响,为临床应用可视喉镜提供参考依据。 方法:选取2012年9月至2013年9月拟经口气管插管全身麻醉下施择期普通外科手术的患者90例,随机分为A组(GSVL组,30例)、B组(MDLS组,30例)和C组(FOB组,30例)。麻醉诱导后,分别采用三种镜实施经口气管插管操作,记录麻醉诱导前(To)、诱导后(T1),插管即刻(T2)、插管后1min、3min、5min(T3~Ts)的血流动力学指标(SBP、DBP, MAP、HR)。 结果:麻醉诱导后与TO时比较,三组T1的SBP、DBP、MAP较均下降(P0.05), HR变化无统计学意义,TO和T1三组间各项指标变化无显著性差异。与T1比较,T2时段三组全部指标均显著升高(P0.05)。与T0比较,T2时段FOB组的SBP、DBP、MAP、HR均显著升高(P0.05),与MDL和GS组比较,FOB组全部指标显著升高(P0.05)。GS与MDL组比较无显著差异性。与T1比较,T2时段MDL组与GS组全部指标均显著升高,MDL组气管插管时HR显著高于GS组(P0.05)。FOB组HR显著高于GS组和MDL组。与T1相比,T3-T5时段三组的全部指标均显著升高。(P0.05)。与TO相比,T3-T5时段GS组的全部指标与MDL组相比略低,但无显著性差异,FOB组与GS和MDL组比较有显著差异(P0.05)。与T2相比,T3-T5时段GS组与MDL组无显著差异,FOB组与GS组、MDL组比较有显著差异(P0.05)。 结论:1、可视喉镜经口气管插管时,引起的血流动力学反应与直接喉镜相近 2、可视喉镜、纤支镜在困难气道起着重要的作用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to analyze the effect of visual laryngoscope, fiberoptic bronchoscope and direct laryngoscope on hemodynamics in tracheal intubation, and to provide reference for clinical application of visual laryngoscope. Methods: from September 2012 to September 2013, 90 patients undergoing elective general surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into group A (30 cases) and group C (30 cases). After anesthesia induction, three kinds of endoscopy were used to perform the orotracheal intubation respectively. The hemodynamic indexes of SBP DBP and MAPHRA were recorded before and after induction, T1, T2 +, T2 +, T3 + T3 + Ts1, respectively. Results: compared with to after anesthesia induction, the SBPnDBPU map of T 1 group was lower than that of T 1 group (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in HR between to group and T 1 group. Compared with T 1, all indexes in T 2 group were significantly higher than that in T 2 group (P 0 05). Compared with T _ 0, the HR of FOB group was significantly higher than that of T _ 2 group. Compared with MDL and GS group, all indexes of FOB group were significantly higher than that of MDL and GS group. There was no significant difference between MDL group and MDL group. Compared with T1, HR in MDL group and GS group were significantly higher than those in GS group and MDL group at tracheal intubation. Compared with T1, all indexes of T3-T5 group were significantly higher than that of T1 group. Compared with to, all the indexes of GS group were slightly lower than those of MDL group, but there was no significant difference between MDL group and GS group and MDL group (P 0.05). There was no significant difference between GS group and MDL group in T3-T5 period compared with T2. Conclusion: the hemodynamic response induced by visual laryngoscope in orotracheal intubation is similar to that caused by direct laryngoscope. 2. Visual laryngoscope and fiberoptic bronchoscope play an important role in difficult airway.
【学位授予单位】:延边大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:R614

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 梁根强,靳三庆,黄宏辉;芬太尼不同诱导剂量对气管插管时心血管反应的影响[J];广东医学;2003年10期

2 黄丽;;GlideScope视频喉镜在颈椎手术84例气管插管中的应用[J];交通医学;2010年04期

3 孙海涛;薛富善;李成文;刘鲲鹏;张国华;孙海燕;许亚超;刘毅;;光导纤维支气管镜经口和经鼻气管插管对血液动力学影响的比较[J];临床麻醉学杂志;2006年01期

4 周永连;王冬青;沈卫红;;光索引导与喉镜直视气管插管对咽喉损伤的比较[J];临床麻醉学杂志;2006年05期

5 王冬青;;GlideScope视频喉镜在插管困难患者中的应用[J];临床麻醉学杂志;2008年06期

6 李功胜;郑贤军;裴万敏;孔高茵;;Shikani喉镜用于老年人全麻气管插管[J];实用医学杂志;2010年04期

7 曹立群;;视可尼喉镜应用于全身麻醉气管插管的观察[J];中国现代医生;2010年33期

8 赵蔚;邴来英;;全身麻醉联合诱导技术的临床应用观察[J];中国实用医药;2008年04期

9 何凌宏;;Shikani可视喉镜在困难气道气管插管中的应用[J];中国实用医药;2008年08期

10 孙海涛;薛富善;张国华;李成文;李平;刘鲲鹏;;光导纤维支气管镜与直接喉镜经口气管插管对小儿血流动力学的影响[J];中国医学科学院学报;2005年06期



本文编号:1854692

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/1854692.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f7b24***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com