全麻联合硬膜外麻醉及PCEA对老年患者术后早期认知功能的影响
本文选题:硬膜外阻滞 + 硬膜外镇痛 ; 参考:《福建医科大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:【目的】 以接受开放性胃癌根治术(ORG)的老年患者为研究对象,比较全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉+术后硬膜外自控镇痛(PCEA)与全身麻醉+术后静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)、全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉+术后静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)对术后早期认知功能的影响,为选择更适合于老年患者中上腹部手术的麻醉方式提供理论依据。 【方法】 1.选取2013年3月至2014年1月行择期ORG的老年患者90例,年龄>65岁,ASA分级I级~III级,所有受试者对实验及治疗方案均知情同意,且得到医院伦理道德委员会批准。 2.采用随机数字表法,将其分为三组(n=30):全身麻醉+PCIA组(A组)、全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉+PCIA组(B组)、全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉+PCEA组(C组)。B、C两组术中硬膜外阻滞选用0.375%罗哌卡因。 3.分别于术前1d及术后6h、12h、2d、3d、5d采用MMSE对患者进行认知功能评价;于麻醉诱导前10min(T0)、切皮后1h(T1)、关腹后1min(T2)、拔除气管导管即刻(T3)各时间点记录其HR、MAP;于麻醉诱导前、气管拔管后30min采集中心静脉血样(肝素抗凝)测定血糖及皮质醇含量;于麻醉诱导前、术后24h采集中心静脉血样(肝素抗凝),采用酶联免疫吸附双抗体夹心法测定S-100β、NSE、TNF-α浓度;记录术中SEVO及血管活性药物的用量;随访并记录患者术后6h、12h、24h的VAS疼痛评分。 【结果】 1.一般情况:三组患者年龄、性别、ASA分级、BMI、手术时长及术前认知功能水平各项指标比较,差异无统计学意义。 2. POCD发生率:术后6h、12h,C组较A组、B组显著降低(P0.05),A组、B组间差异无统计学意义;术后2d,C组显著低于A组(P0.05),B组与A、C两组差异无统计学意义;术后3d、5d,B、C两组显著低于A组(P0.05),B组与C组差异无统计学意义。 3.血流动力学变化情况:术毕及拔管期,A组患者较B、C两组MAP、HR变化较大(P0.05);组内比较,A组血流动力学变化较大,以术毕和拔管期明显。 4. SEVO用量:A组大于B、C两组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 5. NE用量:B、C两组大于A组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 6.血糖值及皮质醇含量:与术前水平相比,三组患者拔管后均显著增加(P0.05),其中A组增幅明显大于B、C两组(P0.05)。 7. TNF-α变化情况:与术前水平相比,三组术后24h均显著增加(P0.05),其中,A组增幅明显大于B、C两组(P0.05)。 8. S-100β蛋白、NSE变化情况:与术前水平相比,三组术后24h均显著增加(P0.05),其中,A组S-100β蛋白增幅明显大于B、C两组(P0.05);三组间术后24h NSE指标无显著差异。 9. VAS疼痛评分:术后6h, C组显著低于A、B两组(P0.05);术后12h,B、C两组显著低于A组(P0.05);术后24h,三组间无显著差异。 10. Spearman相关分析显示:POCD的发生与术中SEVO用量,,术后VAS评分,拔管后血糖值、皮质醇浓度及术后1d S-100β蛋白、TNF-α浓度呈正相关;与术中血流动力学的稳定性及术中NE用量呈负相关。 【结论】 1.麻醉及ORG,对老年患者认知功能均有一定程度的损害。全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉+PCEA较全身麻醉+PCIA及全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉+PCIA对行ORG的老年患者术后早期认知功能损害最小。 2.全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉+PCEA对术后早期认知功能的正面影响可能与其术中硬膜外阻滞和PCEA从脊髓水平抑制伤害性刺激反射弧的上行传导,同时,全身麻醉使患者在整个手术过程中意识丧失,消除了患者术中的心理应激,有效阻断了手术操作等伤害性刺激传入引起的应激反应,从而更好地抑制神经炎症反应,稳定神经系统功能,降低脑损伤有关。
[Abstract]:Purpose of the project
To study the effects of general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia + postoperative epidural anesthesia ( PCIA ) , general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia + postoperative intravenous analgesia ( PCIA ) on early cognitive function in elderly patients receiving open gastric cancer radical operation ( ORG ) .
Methodology
1 . From March 2013 to January 2014 , 90 elderly patients with ORG were selected , age > 65 years , ASA grade I ~ III , all subjects informed consent to the experimental and treatment regimens , and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital .
2 . It was divided into three groups ( n = 30 ) : general anesthesia + PCIA group ( group A ) , general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia + PCIA group ( group B ) , general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia + PCEA group ( group C ) .
3 . MMSE was used to evaluate the cognitive function in 1d and 6h , 12h , 2d , 3d and 5d after operation respectively .
HR and MAP were recorded at each time point of the tracheal catheter ( T3 ) before induction of anesthesia for 10 minutes ( T0 ) , 1 hour ( T1 ) after skin incision , 1 min ( T2 ) in the abdomen , and immediately ( T3 ) of the tracheal catheter .
Blood samples of central venous blood ( heparin anticoagulant ) were collected for 30 min before induction of anesthesia , and blood glucose and cortisol were measured .
The central venous blood sample ( heparin anticoagulant ) was collected 24 hours after induction of anesthesia , and the concentration of S - 100尾 , NSE and TNF - 伪 was determined by enzyme - linked immunosorbent assay .
The amount of SEVO and active agents in the procedure was recorded .
VAS pain scores at 6 , 12 h , 24 h post - operation were recorded and recorded .
The result is not valid .
1 . General situation : The age , sex , ASA grade , BMI , duration of operation and the level of preoperative cognitive function in three groups showed no statistical significance .
2 . The incidence of POCD : 6h , 12h , group C were significantly lower than that in group A and group B ( P0.05 ) , there was no significant difference between group A and group B .
There was no significant difference between group B and group A and C in group B and group A ( P0.05 ) .
The postoperative 3d , 5d , B and C were significantly lower than that in group A ( P0.05 ) . There was no significant difference between group B and group C .
3 . Changes of hemodynamics : The MAP and HR in group A were significantly higher than those in group B and C ( P0.05 ) .
The hemodynamic changes in group A were larger in group A than in group A .
4 . The dosage of SEVO : group A was more than group B and C , the difference was statistically significant ( P0.05 ) .
5.NE dosage : group B and group C were more than that in group A , the difference was statistically significant ( P0.05 ) .
6 . Blood glucose and cortisol levels : Compared with the preoperative level , the three groups increased significantly ( P0.05 ) , in which group A was significantly larger than that in group B and C ( P0.05 ) .
7 . Changes of TNF - 伪 : Compared with preoperative level , the group A was significantly higher than that in group B and group C ( P0.05 ) .
8 . The changes of S - 100尾protein and NSE in group A were significantly higher than those before operation ( P0.05 ) , and the increase of S - 100 尾 protein in group A was significantly higher than that in group B and C ( P0.05 ) .
There was no significant difference in NSE between the three groups .
9 . VAS pain score : 6 hours after operation , group C was significantly lower than that in group A and group B ( P0.05 ) ;
At 12 h , group B and C were significantly lower than those in group A ( P0.05 ) .
24 hours after operation , there was no significant difference among the three groups .
10 . The correlation analysis showed that the incidence of POCD was positively correlated with the amount of SEVO used in the operation , VAS score after operation , blood glucose level after extraction , cortisol concentration and the concentration of 1d S - 100尾protein and TNF - 伪 after operation .
There was a negative correlation between the stability of hemodynamics and the amount of NE in operation .
Conclusion
1 . Anesthesia and ORG had a certain degree of damage to the cognitive function of elderly patients . General anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia + PCEA combined with epidural anesthesia + PCIA combined with epidural anesthesia + PCIA had minimal impairment of cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing ORG .
2 . The positive effects of general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia + PCEA on early postoperative cognitive function may be related to the effect of epidural block and PCEA on the ascending conduction of the reflex arc from the spinal level . At the same time , general anesthesia makes the patient lose consciousness during the whole operation , eliminates the psychological stress in the operation of the patient , effectively blocks the stress response caused by the harmful stimulation of the operation of the operation and the like , thereby better inhibiting the neuroinflammatory reaction , stabilizing the nervous system function and reducing the brain injury .
【学位授予单位】:福建医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:R614
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 唐忠诚,郑德军,郭燕,梁桂林;硬膜外麻醉加静脉复合的应用效果观察[J];农垦医学;2001年02期
2 李学俊,刘元朝,管巍;硬膜外麻醉下高二氧化碳的产生原因及防治[J];人民军医;2001年07期
3 郭道心,龚兴林,刘波,岳丽;耐乐品在硬膜外麻醉病人单次注药镇痛的研究[J];四川医学;2001年10期
4 陈林;脊柱转移癌于硬膜外麻醉后出现截瘫1例报告[J];中国乡村医药;2001年01期
5 徐孝碧,柏平;单次硬膜外麻醉效果观察[J];现代医药卫生;2001年03期
6 王宇欣;硬膜外麻醉和止痛:大手术后的结果是否会更好?──肯定的证据越来越多[J];英国医学杂志(中文版);2001年02期
7 金清尘;译者评论:谈谈硬膜外麻醉与止痛的利弊[J];英国医学杂志(中文版);2001年02期
8 徐红梅,来庆阁;硬膜外麻醉侧卧位手术时血氧饱和度的变化[J];医学理论与实践;2001年04期
9 刘中凯,杜晨,张昊;硬膜外麻醉俯卧位注药的效果观察[J];临沂医学专科学校学报;2002年02期
10 李梅;硬膜外麻醉在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用[J];中国基层医药;2002年09期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 肖翠容;蒋宗滨;黄子津;冼海燕;冯梅;;帕瑞昔布钠用于硬膜外麻醉手术辅助镇痛的临床研究[A];第十五次长江流域麻醉学学术年会暨2010年中南六省麻醉学学术年会暨2010年湖北省麻醉学学术年会论文集[C];2010年
2 裴丽霞;;硬膜外麻醉应用标本的制作[A];第三届全国解剖学技术会议论文集[C];2011年
3 岳云;;硬膜外麻醉的临床价值及并发症的防治[A];中华医学会第二十次全国麻醉学术年会论文汇编[C];2012年
4 殷世平;黄玉芹;吕亚t
本文编号:1905920
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/1905920.html