局麻药物对GM-CSF表达及皮肤愈合的影响
本文选题:罗哌卡因 + 利多卡因 ; 参考:《山西医科大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:研究目的:探讨局麻药物局部浸润对GM-CSF(粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子)表达及皮肤愈合的影响。研究背景:近年来研究发现局麻药存在新型作用。这些新型的作用属于亦或超出了,临床麻醉及疼痛治疗的范畴,且对局麻药的临床应用和器官,组织功能的影响利弊共存。现已有大量研究结果显示局麻药在全身给药时有明显的抗炎作用。然而在局部给药时,由于组织损伤后固有细胞以及局部神经结构通过神经末梢释放的肽类物质共同参与了局部炎症反应。所以局麻药局部浸润所产生的效应可能与全身应用时所产生的效应完全不同。已有研究证明局麻药可能会影响伤口愈合,但其影响愈合的机制尚不明确。 研究内容及方法: 采用小鼠全层皮肤损伤模型。经腹腔内麻醉以后,在背部正中线近颈侧建造一个1cm×1cm大小的全层皮肤损伤创面。120只(雄性昆明小鼠)创面造模成功后,采用单笼饲养的方式,依次将每笼编号,分别为1~120号,然后严格按照完全随机原则,将小鼠分为三个大组即:对照组(S组,n=40),0.5%罗哌卡因浸润组(P组,n=40),0.5%利多卡因浸润组(D组,n=40)。再将每个大组分为五个时相点,分别为8只。S组用0.9%生理盐水0.1ml/12h创面局部浸润,P组用0.5%罗哌卡因0.1ml/12h创面局部浸润,D组用0.5%利多卡因0.1ml/12h创面局部浸润。分别于伤后第3,5,7,10天,切取创面处的组织,采用ELISA法测定创面GM-CSF表达,,并用BCA蛋白定量法检测各个相应标本中总蛋白的含量,用测量所得的ELISA值与与其相应的BCA值之比表示GM-CSF浓度,来进行组间的比较;分别于伤后第5天和第10天取创面组织检测其病理变化;S组,P组,D组各8只小鼠饲养直至创面愈合以观察创面愈合的时间。 结果: (1)应用ELISA法测定结果显示:小鼠背部缺损创面造模成功后第3d和第5d,P组和D组小鼠的皮肤损伤创面处的GM-CSF的表达显著高于S组(P0.05);且P组和D组间比较,其差异具有统计学意义,P组创面处的GM-CSF表达高于D组(P0.05)。(2)病理学结果:术后第5天:间质内有肉芽组织形成。P2组:间质内有毛细血管,较多成纤维细胞,炎细胞减少。D2组:间质内少量成纤维细胞及炎细胞。S2组:间质内肉芽组织极少见,间质仅见少量成纤维细胞。术后第10天,P4组:表面鳞状上皮明显增生增厚,胶原纤维明显增多。D4组:表面鳞状上皮增厚,有呈梭形的胶原纤维。S4组:表面见鳞状上皮增生,另外可见胶原纤维及少量炎细胞浸润于间质内。(3)各实验组的创面愈合时间:对照组创面愈合的时间为(20.75±2.38)d;0.5%罗哌卡因组创面愈合时间为(16.13±1.36)d;0.5%利多卡因组创面愈合时间为(18.25±1.67)d。P组较D组提前(2.13±1.73)d;D组较S组提前(2.50±1.78)d 结论:局部浸润局麻药物可促进创面GM-CSF的表达有利于皮肤的愈合;罗哌卡因的作用优于利多卡因。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the effect of local anesthetic infiltration on the expression of GM-CSFF (granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor) and skin healing. Background: in recent years, local anesthetics have been found to have new effects. These new effects belong to, or go beyond, clinical anaesthesia and pain treatment, and coexist with the clinical application of anesthetic and the effects of organ and tissue functions. A large number of studies have shown that local anesthetics have a significant anti-inflammatory effect when administered throughout the body. However, during local administration, endogenous cells and peptides released by local nerve structures through nerve endings are involved in the local inflammatory reaction due to tissue injury. So the effect of local anesthetic infiltration may be completely different from that of systemic application. Local anesthetic may affect wound healing, but its mechanism is unclear. Contents and methods of the study: The whole skin injury model of mice was used. After intraperitoneal anesthesia, an 1cm 脳 1cm size full-thickness skin injury wound was constructed on the median line of the back near the neck. After successful modeling of the wound, each cage was numbered from 1 to 120 by single cage feeding. Then, according to the principle of complete randomness, the mice were divided into three groups: control group (group S): control group (group S) with 0.5% ropivacaine infiltration group (group P) and group P with 0.5% lidocaine infiltration group (group D). Each large group was divided into five time points: group S was treated with 0.9% normal saline 0.1ml/12h and group P was treated with 0.5% ropivacaine 0.1ml/12h. Group D was treated with 0.5% lidocaine 0.1ml/12h. The tissue of the wound was cut off on the 10th day after injury, and the expression of GM-CSF was measured by ELISA method. The total protein content of each specimen was detected by BCA protein quantitative method. The GM-CSF concentration was expressed by the ratio of the measured ELISA value to the corresponding BCA value. The histopathological changes of wound tissue were detected on the 5th and 10th day after injury. The rats in group S were fed with 8 mice in group P until the wound healed to observe the time of wound healing. Results: 1) the results of ELISA assay showed that the expression of GM-CSF in the wound of skin injury in group P and D was significantly higher than that in group S on the 3rd and 5th day after the model was established, and the expression of GM-CSF in group P and group D was significantly higher than that in group S, and the expression of GM-CSF in group D was significantly higher than that in group P, and the expression of GM-CSF in group D was significantly higher than that in group S. The expression of GM-CSF in the wound surface of P group was significantly higher than that in D group (P 0.05N. 2) pathological results: on the 5th day after operation, there were granulation tissue formation in interstitial tissue. P2 group: there were capillaries and more fibroblasts in interstitial tissue. In group D 2, a small number of fibroblasts were found in the interstitial cells, and only a few fibroblasts were found in the interstitial cells. On the 10th day after operation, in the P4 group: the surface squamous epithelium was thickened obviously, the collagen fiber was obviously increased. D4 group: the surface squamous epithelium thickened, and the spindle collagen fibers were seen in the S4 group: the squamous epithelium proliferation was observed on the surface. In addition, collagen fibers and a small amount of inflammatory cells infiltrated the interstitial stroma.) the wound healing time of each experimental group was 20.75 卤2.38 days of ropivacaine 0.5% ropivacaine group was 16.13 卤1.36 days old and 0.5% lidocaine group wound healing time was 16.13 卤1.36 days. 2. 13 卤1. 73 days in group D and 2. 50 卤1. 78 days earlier in group D than in group S. 18. 25 卤2. 25 卤1. 78 days earlier than group D Conclusion: local anesthetic infiltration can promote the expression of GM-CSF in wound and ropivacaine is superior to lidocaine.
【学位授予单位】:山西医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:R614
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姜惠臣;张凤琴;王立民;;局麻药中毒致死原因如何?[J];吉林医学;1990年01期
2 徐亚莉;范成明;;新型缓释剂型局部麻醉药的研究现状[J];现代医药卫生;2008年03期
3 马青;刘玉翠;;皮肤病手术的局部麻醉[J];遵义医学院学报;1989年04期
4 唐金华;郭雅丽;许钦燕;;局麻手术时局麻药的严重毒性反应[J];现代中西医结合杂志;2007年13期
5 黄文起;刘宽智;;局麻药物对神经及心血管的毒性[J];广东医学;2006年11期
6 刘勇;陈济安;齐麟;张旭东;关大鹏;;臂丛神经阻滞致局麻药毒性反应6例[J];实用手外科杂志;2007年04期
7 李林森;周亮;;不同温度局麻药物对硬膜外麻醉后寒战的影响作用[J];中国医药指南;2010年02期
8 窦连军;周国强;;罗哌卡因在妇产科麻醉中的应用效果(综述)[J];中国城乡企业卫生;2011年04期
9 盛宝恒;;对普沷卡因等局麻药物中毒及处理的一些新看法[J];人民军医;1963年04期
10 王为之;两种不同局麻药在第三磨牙手术时对血钾水平的影响[J];国外医学.口腔医学分册;1990年02期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 赵继荣;;腰椎间盘突出症注射治疗近况[A];第11届全国中西医结合骨伤科学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2003年
2 陈中书;;电视硬质气管镜在大气道疾病介入治疗中的应用价值[A];江西省中西医结合学会呼吸病专业委员会首次学术会议论文集[C];2009年
3 解晓毅;吴东亮;;雪莲混合液治疗颈椎病临床观察[A];中国康复医学会第十一次全国颈椎病学术会议论文集[C];2009年
4 毕胜;李世荣;杨东运;胡晓佳;;不同温度肿胀麻醉液对利多卡因血药浓度的影响[A];第七届中国医师协会美容与整形医师大会论文集[C];2010年
5 赵莹莹;孙书臣;时金华;贾擎;孙书臣;;针刺麻醉与局部麻醉用于慢性鼻炎下鼻甲肥大低温等离子射频消融术疗效的比较[A];世界中联耳鼻喉口腔专业委员会换届大会及第三次学术年会暨中华中医药学会耳鼻喉科分会第十七次学术交流会暨广东省中医及中西医结合学会耳鼻喉科学术交流会论文汇编[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 程书权;名相近 效迥异[N];医药经济报;2003年
2 鲁永鲜 雪戈;快乐地做妈妈[N];大众科技报;2003年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 杨波;骶管注射疗法中激素种类、浓度及碱化溶液选择的安全性研究[D];南方医科大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王文玺;局麻药物对GM-CSF表达及皮肤愈合的影响[D];山西医科大学;2014年
2 李富利;新型经皮局麻药物制剂—利多卡因醇质体的研究[D];南方医科大学;2011年
3 张芳;体外研究三种常用局麻药物—布比卡因、利多卡因、罗哌卡因对NK细胞活性的影响[D];山东大学;2007年
4 傅晓静;肛门失禁动物模型的构建[D];南方医科大学;2009年
5 牛晓光;复方盐酸利多卡因对大鼠坐骨神经病理性疼痛的神经阻滞作用[D];河北医科大学;2012年
6 刘维刚;盐酸右美托咪定用于膝关节镜手术患者腰硬联合麻醉的临床观察[D];吉林大学;2013年
7 王华;0.75%罗哌卡因与0.75%布比卡因在高龄患者下肢手术中连续腰麻的对比研究[D];桂林医学院;2013年
8 董发慧;中药醒脑静对老年患者术后早期认知功能的影响[D];佳木斯大学;2011年
9 杨力;两种不同麻醉方法对腹腔镜结肠癌患者围术期细胞免疫及IL-6的影响[D];南昌大学医学院;2013年
10 汪丽娜;腰丛—坐骨神经阻滞在老年人全膝关节置换的临床应用[D];大连医科大学;2013年
本文编号:1907299
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/1907299.html