不同硬膜外覆盖物预防腰椎手术后瘢痕粘连形成的实验研究
[Abstract]:[objective] to evaluate the effect of different epidural coverings on the formation of scar adhesion around dural sac after lumbar surgery, and to explore its mechanism. [methods] Eighty Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups: group 1 (using collagen sponge plus dexamethasone), group 2 (using collagen sponge alone), group 1 (treated with collagen sponge), group 2 (using collagen sponge alone), group 1 (treated with collagen sponge plus dexamethasone); Experimental group 3 (using gelfoam): control group (without any epidural covering), each group of 20 experimental animals, after anesthesia in the middle of the back incision L1-L5 total laminectomy, resulting in 0.2cm 脳 1.5cm bone defect, exposed dural sac. In group 1, collagen sponge was placed in epidural and injected with 0.1ML dexamethasone, collagen sponge was placed in epidural in experimental group 2, gelatin sponge was placed in epidural in experimental group 3, muscle layer and fascia layer were sutured with microinstruments. On the other hand, the control group directly sutured the muscle fascia tissue to close the wound. After 12 weeks of conventional feeding, the incision was performed from the original incision to observe the formation of epidural scar and its adhesion to the dura dural. The modified Rydell-balazs standard and modified Nuss-baum standard were used to evaluate quantitatively. After the experimental animals were divided into groups, the tissue samples in the surgical area were taken by microsurgery. The expression of TGF- 尾 _ 1 in the epidural scar and surrounding tissues was detected by immunohistochemistry and Western blot detection, and the differences between the two groups were compared. [results] No accidental death occurred in all experimental animals during the course of the study. The Rydell-balazs score of epidural scar tissue showed that there was significant difference between experimental group 1 and experimental group 2 and control group (P0.01), and there was significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (P0.01), while group 1 and group 2 showed significant difference in comparison with group 3 (P0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05), but there was no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group (P0.05). Using modified Nuss-baum standard score, The results showed that there was significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (P0.01), and between group 1 and group 3 (P0.01), but there was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (P0.05). There was no significant difference between the three groups and the control group (P0.05). Immunohistochemical results showed that TGF- 尾 1 and VEGF were positive in all four groups, but the expression of TGF- 尾 1 and VEGF in experimental group 1 and group 2 were significantly lower than those in experimental group 3 and control group. The results of optical density analysis showed that there were significant differences between experimental group 1 and control group (P0.01), and between group 1 and group 2 (P0.01), but there was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (P0.05). There was no significant difference between experimental group 3 and control group (P0.05) Western blot analysis showed that TGF- 尾 1 and VEGF protein were positive in all four groups, but the expression of TGF- 尾 1 and VEGF protein in group 1 and group 2 were significantly lower than those in group 3 and control group. The results of optical density analysis showed that there were significant differences (P0.01) and PO.01 (P0.01) between experimental group 1 and group 2, but no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (P0.05). There was no significant difference (PO.05) between experimental group 3 and control group. [conclusion] Collagen sponge can significantly reduce the formation of peridural scar hyperplasia and adhesion after lumbar surgery in experimental rats, and the addition of local injection of dexamethasone does not enhance this effect. Local application of gelatin sponge can not prevent epidural scar adhesion. The low expression of TGF- 尾 1 and VEGF may be one of the important mechanisms to reduce the adhesion of epidural scar.
【学位授予单位】:天津医科大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:R687.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 沈康平,陈正形,李家顺,贾连顺,宋海涛,顾晓民,来茂德;预防全椎板切除后椎管再狭窄的实验研究[J];第二军医大学学报;2000年07期
2 胡丹,惠延年,PhilipP.Chen;丝裂霉素C抑制人结膜囊成纤维细胞生长及增殖[J];第四军医大学学报;2001年13期
3 李涛,陈日景,钟桂午,吴养,吴春辉,李志丹;同种异体胎儿颅骨脑脊膜椎管成形在预防椎板切除后硬膜外瘢痕中的临床应用[J];解剖与临床;2005年01期
4 宫良泰,许复郁,戴国锋,刘晓玲;明胶海绵对硬脊膜作用的实验研究[J];山东医科大学学报;2001年04期
5 黄德清,丁吉元,曹永成,左金良;保存硬脊膜预防椎管内术后粘连的实验研究[J];实用骨科杂志;1998年04期
6 褚言琛;邹云雯;尹海磊;;KS强化人工腱膜预防椎板切除术后硬脊膜粘连研究[J];齐鲁医学杂志;2007年04期
7 张平,韦勇君,卢长巍,韦寿繁,刘景发,罗丽群,秦玉梅,黄瑞华,覃冠平,丘文峰;保留椎板加椎管内置管冲洗预防硬膜外瘢痕粘连的研究与应用[J];右江民族医学院学报;2001年03期
8 王艳梅;木合塔尔·霍加;张晨;;转化生长因子β及其信号通路的研究进展[J];医学综述;2011年22期
9 梁裕,张云海,龚耀成;预防椎板切除术后硬膜外瘢痕的实验研究[J];中华创伤杂志;2000年06期
10 慈元,李正维,敖强,吴汝舟,吕德成,隋云先,王庆华;预防椎板切除术后硬膜周围纤维化与粘连[J];中华创伤杂志;2004年08期
,本文编号:2142089
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/2142089.html