经皮腰椎内窥镜下手术麻醉方案选择的前瞻性随机对照研究
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the effect of different local infiltration anesthesia on pain control in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar surgery. Methods: from February 2015 to June 2015, patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar disc resection (PELD) for lumbar disc herniation in our hospital were included in this study. Two groups were randomly divided into two groups: group A was anesthetized with 1% lidocaine diluted solution for local infiltration; Group B received local infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine hydrochloride injection 100mg and intravenous injection of fentanyl citrate (0.05mg) and ondansetron hydrochloride (8 mg 路L-1) before the beginning of the operation. The effect of pain control was evaluated by VAS score in intervertebral foramen formative stage, VAS score in fibroring operation stage, immediate and 24 hours postoperative reoperation intention. Results: 82 patients were included in the study, group A (n = 42) and group B (n = 40). The mean pain VAS score (1.1 卤0.9) and peak pain VAS score (1.3 卤0.9) in group B were significantly lower than those in group A (3.2 卤2.4 and 5.1 卤2.3) during the formative period of intervertebral foramen. There was no significant difference in the mean pain VAS score and peak VAS score between the two groups during the operation period. The immediate reoperation intention in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (95.0% / 71.4%). There was no significant difference in reoperation intention between the two groups 24 hours after operation (97.5% vs 97.6%). There were no anesthesia and operation-related complications in both groups. Conclusion: Lidocaine combined with ropivacaine combined with intravenous fentanyl can significantly improve pain control during endoscopic lumbar surgery without increasing the risk of operation.
【作者单位】: 北京大学第三医院疼痛医学中心;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81472041) 北京市卫计委首都卫生行业发展专项基金(2014-2-4094) 北京市科委首都临床特色应用研究(Z141107002514011) 北医三院院临床重点课题(Y66448-09)
【分类号】:R614
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李宇;;不同麻醉方案对腹腔镜手术患者血浆皮质醇的影响[J];南华大学学报(医学版);2008年03期
2 张朋彬;刘同华;;3种无痛苦胃镜麻醉方案的最小成本分析[J];中国药房;2010年06期
3 周玉;余奇劲;;合并心脏疾病剖宫产手术患者的麻醉方案选择[J];中华临床医师杂志(电子版);2012年17期
4 雷晚红;杨洁;陈娟;余奇劲;;两种麻醉方案用于经皮肾镜取石术的利弊分析和临床抉择[J];医学与哲学(临床决策论坛版);2011年04期
5 邓城旗;费翔;岳琦;王乐;郝建华;;不同麻醉方案在小儿烧伤中的应用分析[J];现代生物医学进展;2014年21期
6 肖敏;;试论麻醉失误与防范[J];中国医学创新;2010年11期
7 王灿灿;赵逢禹;王勇;;插件式智能麻醉系统[J];计算机与现代化;2014年07期
8 彭庆明;刘文捷;李玉成;郭立平;;不同麻醉方案对LC患者血浆TNF-α及IL-1β的影响[J];医学临床研究;2006年09期
9 黄运佰 ,梁敏 ,文生豪;妇产科急诊腹腔内出血病人的麻醉处理(附238例经验总结)[J];海南医学;2003年11期
10 高鹏;;手术麻醉 半麻、全麻哪个好[J];医药与保健;2008年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 言城;技术虽好成本高[N];医药经济报;2003年
2 张天华;全麻会损害孩子智力吗?[N];大众卫生报;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 易利丹;新型镇静镇痛药盐酸右美托咪定加用于常规麻醉方案的成本—效果研究[D];中南大学;2011年
2 张洪军;支气管镜检查治疗术麻醉方案优化多中心研究[D];苏州大学;2012年
3 唐富东;支气管内超声引导针吸活检术麻醉方案优化研究[D];苏州大学;2013年
,本文编号:2443339
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/2443339.html