当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 泌尿论文 >

二次电切治疗高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌28例

发布时间:2018-03-19 20:29

  本文选题:非肌层浸润性膀胱癌 切入点:二次电切 出处:《实用医学杂志》2015年03期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:目的:探讨二次电切(repeat transurethral resection,re-TUR)治疗高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(non-muscle invasive bladder cancer,NMIBC)的临床意义。方法 :收集68例首次经尿道电切术(transurethral resection,TUR)诊断为高危NMIBC的患者资料,其中28例2~6周内接受re-TUR(观察组),40例未接受re-TUR(对照组),术后常规吡柔比星膀胱灌注化疗。评估首次TUR肿瘤残留率及病理分期的低估率,并比较两组膀胱肿瘤复发、进展情况。结果:观察组肿瘤残留率为46.43%(13/28),病理分期低估率为21.43%(6/28)。随访12~48个月(平均25个月),观察组肿瘤残留者与无肿瘤残留者的进展率分别为44.44%、6.67%(P0.05);观察组肿瘤总复发率及1、2年内复发率均比对照组低(P0.05),但在进展方面两组无差异(P0.05)。结论:高危NMIBC电切术后肿瘤残留率、复发率、进展率高。re-TUR治疗高危NMIBC不仅在诊断和治疗,而且在预后判断方面都具有临床应用价值,但re-TUR不能够延缓膀胱肿瘤进展,仍需辅助其他方法进行综合治疗。
[Abstract]:Objective: To investigate the two TURP (repeat transurethral resection, re-TUR) for high-risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer (non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, NMIBC) and the clinical significance. Methods: We collected 68 cases of the first transurethral resection (transurethral resection, TUR) diagnosis for patients with high-risk NMIBC data, including 28 cases of 2~6 take re-TUR weeks (observation group), 40 patients received re-TUR (control group), after routine intravesical instillation of pirarubicin chemotherapy. Assessing the TUR tumor residual rate and pathological staging underestimated the rate, and compare the two groups of bladder tumor recurrence and progress. Results: in the observation group, the residual tumor rate was 46.43% (13/28), pathological staging underestimated the rate of 21.43% (6/28). The follow-up of 12~48 months (average 25 months) in the observation group, tumor residual and no tumor residual rate were 44.44%, 6.67% (P0.05); the observation group total tumor recurrence rate and recurrence rate were 1,2 years Lower than the control group (P0.05), but in the progress of no significant difference between two groups (P0.05). Conclusion: high risk NMIBC residual tumor after transurethral resection rate, recurrence rate, high rate of progress of.Re-TUR for high risk NMIBC not only in the diagnosis and treatment, and the judgment has clinical value in prognosis, but re-TUR can not delay bladder tumor progression, still need to assist other methods of treatment.

【作者单位】: 广西自治区人民医院泌尿外科;
【基金】:广西卫生厅科研基金项目(编号:Z2010249)
【分类号】:R737.14

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张遵俊;王世先;郭昭建;范先明;;二次电切治疗多发Ta期膀胱尿路上皮癌临床分析[J];中国医药导刊;2013年11期

2 迟庆龙;王艳波;王春喜;;水飞蓟宾对人膀胱癌细胞系T24和5637的增殖抑制及凋亡诱导作用[J];吉林大学学报(医学版);2014年02期

3 全翔凤;姚莉;唐冬媛;伍琳凌;潘柳霖;吴秋兰;;膀胱癌术后早期膀胱灌注化疗的护理[J];当代护士(中旬刊);2014年05期

4 容祖益;梁建波;李伟;;初次经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术后肿瘤残留的多因素分析[J];广西医学;2014年12期

5 许天源;朱照伟;钟山;张小华;王先进;张敏光;沈周俊;;EORTC风险量表对非肌层浸润性膀胱癌术后即刻灌注化疗预后判断的研究[J];临床泌尿外科杂志;2013年07期

6 许克新;;高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌需要再次电切吗?[J];现代泌尿外科杂志;2013年06期

7 梁胜杰;邹青松;韩邦e,

本文编号:1635875


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mjlw/1635875.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户76505***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com