针刺与西药治疗慢性前列腺炎疗效比较的Meta分析

发布时间：2018-06-09 00:48

本文选题：慢性前列腺炎 + 针刺　；参考：《中国老年学杂志》2017年06期

【摘要】：目的评价针刺与西药治疗慢性前列腺炎的疗效。方法检索中国知网数据库、万方数据库、维普数据库、Pub Med数据库、Medline数据库等及手工检索,纳入针刺治疗慢性前列腺炎与常规西药治疗比较的随机对照试验(RCT)和临床对照试验(CCT),根据Jadad评分标准,对纳入研究的文献进行质量评价。采用Rev Man4.2统计软件进行Meta分析。结果 13篇文献符合纳入标准,共1 428例患者。Meta分析显示:针刺对照西药治疗,总有效率的组间比较差异有统计学意义〔OR=4.11,95%CI(2.97~5.69),P0.000 01〕;治愈率的组间比较差异有统计学意义〔OR=3.93,95%CI(3.08~5.02),P0.000 01〕;结论针刺治疗慢性前列腺炎有效,在总有效率和治愈率方面具有一定优势,但因纳入文献数量少,且大部分质量较低,尚需高质量证据来验证。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture and western medicine in the treatment of chronic prostatitis. Methods to search the database of Chinese knowledge net, Wanfang, Weipu, Pub Med and Medline, and to search by hand. A randomized controlled trial (RCTR) and a clinical controlled trial (CCT) were used to evaluate the quality of the literature included in the study according to the Jadad scoring standard. Meta-analysis was carried out by using Rev Man4.2 statistical software. Results 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1 428 patients. Meta-analysis showed that there was significant difference in total effective rate between the two groups (P 0.00001), and the total effective rate was 4.1195% (P = 0.00001). Conclusion Acupuncture is effective in the treatment of chronic prostatitis, which has some advantages in the total effective rate and cure rate, but due to the low quantity of literature and the low quality of most of the literature, the difference of cure rate between groups has statistical significance. High quality evidence is needed to verify this.
【作者单位】：枣庄科技职业学院;甘肃中医药大学;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金地区基金项目(No.81060304)
【分类号】：R697.33

【相似文献】