两种吊带手术治疗女性压力性尿失禁疗效分析
[Abstract]:Stressurinary incontinence (SUI) is a common, troublesome and costly disease for women. About 33% of adult women reported abroad will have urinary incontinence, and the older the age, the higher the incidence. Domestic reports, the average incidence of SUI in adult women is about 18.9%, the highest incidence of SUI. Surgical treatment for SUI was proposed by the American Urological Association (AUA). In 2013, Lucas, a scholar, recommended the Middle Urethral tension-free suspension as a Grade A treatment for SUI. In three generations, the second generation of trans-obturator tension-free vaginal tape (TVT-O) has become a common procedure, with a 5-year cure rate of 90.8%. The subsequent single-incision adjustable A-JUST sling (A-JUST) has a cure rate of 80%-91% in 6-12 months follow-up. Overseas studies reported that the subjective and objective cure rates of A-JUST surgery were not significantly different from those of TVT-O surgery. A-JUST surgery was first used in China in 2012, and there were few comparative studies on the efficacy of the two kinds of surgery in China. Objective To compare the clinical effects of A-JUST operation and TVT-O operation in the treatment of female SUI, and to explore the similarities and differences between the two methods. A total of 105 patients with SUI were operated on by the same surgeon. 53 patients in the A-JUST group and 52 patients in the TVT-O group were operated on. The age, course of disease, pregnant and parturient times, body mass index (BMI), weight of one-hour urine pad test and combined operation were recorded. During the operation, the amount of bleeding during the operation, the pain in the medial thigh after operation, the time of catheter removal and the length of hospitalization were recorded. Results 1. There was no significant difference in preoperative data between the two groups (P 0.05). The operative time and intraoperative bleeding were comparable between the two groups. 2. Among the 8 patients in TVT-O group, the incidence of medial thigh traction pain was 1.9%, 13.4%, P = 0.010 respectively. The difference was statistically significant. The average incidence of medial thigh traction pain was 1.9%, 13.4%, P = 0.010 in A-JUST group. The average hospitalization days in TVT-O group were 7.47 [1.83], P = 0.000, and the difference was statistically significant. 3. The I-QOL scores of A-JUST group were 25.27 [4.43], 90.43 [4.42], 90.48 [4.39], 87.15 [5.52] at 6, 12 and 24 months after operation, respectively. The I-QOL scores of TVT-O group were significantly higher than those before operation (P There was no significant difference in I-QOL scores between the two groups (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in I-QOL scores between the two groups (P 0.05). After 6 months follow-up, the leakage of urine in A-JUST group was 88.7%, TVT-O group was 86.5%, P = 0.932; PGI-I score was 88.7% in A-JUST group, 92.3% in TVT-O group, P = 0.884. There was no significant difference in subjective and objective cure rate between the two groups, and the curative effect was comparable. Possible complications occurred 24 months later in group A-JUST, including 3 cases with increased abdominal pressure and 1 case with foreign body sensation during intercourse. The incidence of complications was 7.5%(4/53). In group TVT-O, 2 cases with increased abdominal pressure leaked urine and 1 case with slight sling exposure. The incidence of complications was 5.8%(3/52). There was no significant difference between the two groups (_~2=0.117, P 0.05). The short-term follow-up effect of A-JUST operation on SUI is obvious, which is close to the subjective and objective cure rate of TVT-O operation. Both operations are suitable for various degrees of SUI, and the effect is obvious. A-JUST operation has the advantages of short hospital stay and low incidence of medial thigh traction pain after operation.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R699.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄艳;李兆艾;;女性压力性尿失禁的治疗进展[J];中国妇幼健康研究;2016年07期
2 应小燕;;老年妇女压力性尿失禁的手术治疗[J];实用老年医学;2016年04期
3 韦巍;谢克基;张少林;韦兴聪;;Ajust单切口微吊带术对比TVT-O/TOT治疗女性压力性尿失禁近期效果的Meta分析[J];临床泌尿外科杂志;2015年10期
4 辛星;宋悦;夏志军;;Ajust~与TVT-O~(TM)治疗压力性尿失禁的前瞻性研究[J];国际妇产科学杂志;2015年05期
5 朱兰;陈娟;;女性压力性尿失禁手术治疗的几个新观点[J];中国计划生育和妇产科;2015年08期
6 孙峰;孙新成;颉亮;许衍超;马凰斌;史庆路;;单切口可调节Ajust~(TM)吊带治疗固有括约肌障碍型女性压力性尿失禁疗效及安全性分析[J];中国性科学;2015年08期
7 王巍;朱兰;郎景和;;阴道单切口可调节Ajust~(TM)吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁中期随访研究[J];中国实用妇科与产科杂志;2015年08期
8 卞飞;周峰;陈卫国;李纲;;尿道中段悬吊术治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效及安全性分析[J];医学研究生学报;2015年06期
9 李红芹;吴大威;赵小明;马智勇;;女性压力性尿失禁患者疾病认知及就诊情况临床分析[J];中国妇幼保健;2015年11期
10 韩新军;李中学;涂小峰;席国旺;孙强;;不同术式治疗女性压力性尿失禁40例临床研究[J];中国现代医生;2013年22期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 韦巍;Ajust~(TM)单切口微型尿道中段吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的系统评价[D];广州医科大学;2014年
,本文编号:2211260
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mjlw/2211260.html