血液净化治疗患者血管通路使用情况分析
[Abstract]:The purpose of the study on the use of vascular access in a maintenance hemodialysis patient is to identify the first and present use of vascular access in our central hemodialysis patients and the factors affecting them. Method: The maintenance hemodialysis patients were included in the study from July 2015 to December 2015. The data collected from this central dialysis patient's registry, the Haitai electronic database, the hemodialysis record sheet, and the questionnaire. The data collected included age, sex, baseline data from the beginning to the hemodialysis, the original onset, the dialysis age, and the comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, and the like. No polyester jacket catheter and catheter with cuff catheter with tunnel, retention time, complication, etc. Autologous or grafted arteriovenous contraindications, including the establishment site, the mature time, the service life and the complications, etc. In addition, the change of the vascular access and the results of the patient's laboratory tests were collected. Results: There were 294 patients,189 (64.3%),105 (35.7%), 53.2-15.1 (15-87), and 6.2 (0.3-32) years. The primary glomerular nephritis is the main disease. In the first time,56 cases (19.0%) and 235 cases (79.9%) of the vascular access were treated. The primary reason for the first hemodialysis not to be used was: the diagnosis of uremia was 55.9% at the time of the visit, and no one was informed of 23.0%. In the present, 91.8% of the vascular access and the Cuff catheter with the tunnel account for 6.12%. In patients with age over 65 years of age, the rate of use of vascular access was reduced and the rate of catheter usage increased. In patients with dialysis age less than 2 years, the use rate of Cuff catheter with tunnel was the highest, and the vascular access of over 20 years of dialysis was the inside of the artery and vein. There were mainly internal jugular vein and internal jugular vein, and the incidence of infection was low, 1.09/1000 catheter days and 2.03/1000 catheter days, respectively. The main part of the internal jugular vein of the vein was mainly the left inferior artery-head vein (75.4%), and the first-choice end-end anastomosis. There was no significant difference in sex, age, operation site, blood flow and internal life of the first time before and after the first dialysis. The early complications of the early complications of the AVMs are the postoperative thrombosis, and the late complications mainly include internal occlusion, aneurysm-like expansion or aneurysm formation, insufficient blood flow, and limb edema. After the balloon was expanded and the stent was placed, the vessel was recanalized and the edema of the limb disappeared. The use of the graft and arterio-venous system was low, with only one patient. Conclusion: Through the cross-sectional investigation, the first hemodialysis vascular access in our center is dominated by the non-polyester sleeve catheter, and the current vascular access is mainly in the vein of the vein. The catheter insertion site was mainly internal jugular vein, and the incidence of infection was lower. The site of the vein of the arteriovenous is the main artery-head vein of the left side, and the preferred end is in good agreement. The early complications of the early complications of the arteriovenous malformation are the postoperative thrombosis, and the late complications mainly include internal occlusion, aneurysm-like expansion or aneurysm formation, insufficient blood flow, and limb edema. Unfortunately, in our central hemodialysis patients, the use of graft and vein is less, and is not yet available. Objective: To study the vascular access and complications of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with continuous renal replacement therapy. Method: From April 2014 to October 2014, the data of the continuous renal replacement therapy in this center was collected, including the demographic data, the original incidence, the department, the blood pressure, the heart rate, the SOFA score, the APACHE II score, the presence or absence of the immunosuppressants, the presence or absence of mechanical ventilation, The method of continuous renal replacement therapy, the selection of the vascular access, the location of the catheter in the non-polyester sleeve catheter, the time of the catheter insertion, the blood flow, the presence or absence of the catheter, the location of the re-insertion, the time of the catheter after the re-placement, the catheter care, the cumulative time of use of the catheter, Catheter function loss of work and catheter infection, etc. In addition, that change of the vascular access of the patient and the result of laboratory examination were also collected. Results:292 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study. Of these,175 males (59.9%),117 females (40.1%), and 50.8 to 18.6 years (12 to 94 years). The patients with CRRT were AKI, MODS and SIRS. Vascular access:280 patients had the choice of PET-free catheter, the proportion was 95.9%, and 11 patients used AVMs for 3.77%, and one patient used long-term polyester sleeve with tunnel. There were mainly right internal jugular vein (54.3%) and right femoral vein (30.7%) and left femoral vein (13.2%). in that case of the internal medicine department and the emergency department, the catheter site is mainly the right internal jugular vein, and the surgical patient is mainly the right and left femoral veins; in addition, the CRRT method and the continuous vein venous hemofiltration patient are mainly provided with a femoral vein, The right internal jugular vein was the main.32 patients (11.4%) had to be re-inserted in the treatment of CRRT, with a total of 51 times, an average of 1.59 and 0.98 times, and the maximum number of re-insertion times was 4 times. The reason of the re-insertion is the function of the infection and the function of the catheter; the site of the re-insertion is the main (52.9%) of the left femoral vein, and the re-insertion site only accounts for 21.6% of the same person as the first place of the catheter. The function of the catheter was lost, accounting for 7.14% of all the patients, accounting for 11.8% of the total number of the tubes, the median time of the function of the catheter was 5 days, the mean time of use was 8.95 days, the reason was that the thrombus in the catheter (17.9%) and the blood flow of the catheter were not sufficient (82.1%). The main risk factors of the multi-factor analysis of the function loss of the catheter were the cumulative time of CRRT and the level of Hb. In addition, the mean time of catheter infection was 10.7 days after the placement of the tube, the incidence of catheter infection was 7.19/1000 catheter days, the incidence of catheter infection was higher than that of the internal jugular vein, and the surgical patient was higher than that of the medical patient. The main factors that affect the catheter infection are the cumulative use time of the catheter and the serum ALB level. Conclusion: Through the cross-sectional investigation, we find that the vascular access of the central CRRT is the main choice of the non-polyester-free catheter, and the site of the catheter is the right internal jugular vein, and some patients need to be re-inserted. The main risk factors of the function failure of the catheter are the CRRT accumulation time and the blood Hb level. The mean time for catheter infection was 10.7 days after placement and the incidence of catheter infection was 7.19/1000 catheter days. The main factors that affect the catheter infection are the cumulative use time of the catheter and the serum ALB level.
【学位授予单位】:第二军医大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R692.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈侣林,徐秀蓉,周妤,郝惠文,刘俊,贾丽娟;急诊血液透析不同血管通路的对比分析[J];中国厂矿医学;2005年03期
2 叶朝阳;;血管通路的功能评估[J];中国血液净化;2007年07期
3 袁伟杰;;应关注血管通路远期并发症及其处理[J];中国血液净化;2009年06期
4 苏白海;付平;;充分认识和面对建立永久性血管通路所面临的挑战[J];中国血液净化;2009年07期
5 何雪花;;化疗患者血管通路的护理管理[J];中国民间疗法;2010年06期
6 李凤君;足背动脉在暂时性血管通路中的应用[J];张家口医学院学报;1998年01期
7 庞慧华,钱家麒,张庆怡,黄佩文,张纪蔚,张皓;血透中永久性血管通路的功能监测[J];上海第二医科大学学报;2000年04期
8 王笑云;;要重视透析血管通路创建维护和并发症的防治[J];中国血液净化;2007年07期
9 孙晓萌;刘宏;刘必成;;血管通路感染的诊治进展[J];中国血液净化;2013年06期
10 黄建业,高贺通,姜建芳;化疗用血管通路装置在临床中的应用与护理[J];第二军医大学学报;1999年11期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 叶朝阳;;血管通路的功能评估[A];中华医学会肾脏学分会2004年年会暨第二届全国中青年肾脏病学术会议专题讲座汇编[C];2004年
2 叶朝阳;华参;;血管通路的功能监测[A];中华医学会肾脏病学分会2006年学术年会专题讲座[C];2006年
3 王笑云;;慢性血管通路选择和并发症防治[A];血液透析进展学习班讲义[C];2006年
4 冯玉珍;李采琼;周婧;;维持性血液透析患者血管通路的并发症及护理[A];全国内科护理学术交流会议、全国心脏内、外科护理学术交流会议、第9届全国糖尿病护理学术交流会议、第9届全国血液净化护理学术交流会议论文汇编[C];2011年
5 Janet Pettit;;儿科&新生儿最佳血管通路选择[A];全国儿科护理学术交流会议论文汇编[C];2012年
6 徐秋兰;;血脂净化治疗中建立两种血管通路的体会[A];第一届全国疑难重型肝病大会、第四届全国人工肝及血液净化学术年会论文集[C];2008年
7 陈丽云;施素华;梁萌;许树根;;两种血管穿刺法对透析血管通路狭窄发生率的影响[A];第十一届全国中西医结合肾脏病学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
8 张玉强;陈顺杰;徐成刚;叶朝阳;赵学智;;维持性血液透析患者疑难血管通路的选择和应用经验[A];“中华医学会肾脏病学分会2004年年会”暨“第二届全国中青年肾脏病学术会议”论文汇编[C];2004年
9 吴红艳;张乐;艾方;范志萍;李霞;;血液净化者血管通路的管理[A];中华医院管理学会血液净化中心管理分会2004年会论文汇编[C];2004年
10 梅长林;;血管通路的选择及并发症防治[A];贵州省医学会肾脏病学分会2008年学术年会论文汇编[C];2008年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 付东红 管九苹;北京大学临床肿瘤学院血管通路中心成立[N];中国医药报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 任红旗;血液净化治疗患者血管通路使用情况分析[D];第二军医大学;2016年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 李剑莹;维持性血液透析患者血管通路现状及影响因素分析[D];安徽医科大学;2015年
2 杨艳丽;维持性血液透析患者血管通路建立和应用情况的临床调查研究[D];河北医科大学;2011年
3 张颖秋;维持性血透患者血管通路再循环测定方法的对比研究[D];第二军医大学;2004年
4 丁燕平;两种血管通路血液透析患者住院率及生存情况的比较[D];广西医科大学;2015年
,本文编号:2508688
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mjlw/2508688.html