衰弱综合评估工具的汉化及信效度检验

发布时间：2018-02-28 05:46

本文关键词： 衰弱综合评估工具中文版信度效度社区老年人　出处：《中国康复理论与实践》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的对英文版衰弱综合评估工具(CFAI)进行汉化,检验中文版的信、效度。方法采用Brislin翻译模型对英文版CFAI进行汉化。2015年5月至7月,采用经过文化调试的CFAI及世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)对石家庄市200名社区老年人进行评定;首次评估1周后,选取其中30名采用CFAI进行第2次评估。6名老年医学专家对CFAI进行内容效度评分,CFAI总分与WHOQOL-BREF总分及两次CFAI评分进行Pearson相关分析,对CFAI进行因子分析,计算CFAI的Cronbachα。结果汉化CFAI包含4个维度,23个条目;内容效度指数为0.782;因子分析得到6个公因子,累积方差贡献率64.05%;CFAI总分与WHOQOL-BREF总分中度负相关(r=-0.764,P0.001)。量表总分Cronbachα=0.837,重测相关系数r=0.604~0.941(P0.001)。结论汉化CFAI有较好的信度和效度,可用于我国社区老年人的衰弱评估。
[Abstract]:Objective to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the English version of CFAI. Methods the Chinese version of CFAI was translated into Chinese by Brislin model. From May 2015 to July, the Chinese version of CFAI was used to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version. Two hundred elderly people in Shijiazhuang City were assessed with the culturally adjusted CFAI and the World Health Organization (WHO) quality of Life Summary Table (WHOQOL-BREFF); one week after the first assessment, 30 of them were assessed by CFAI for the second time. 6 geriatrics experts were selected to evaluate the content validity of CFAI. The total score of WHOQOL-BREF and the total score of WHOQOL-BREF and the score of CFAI twice were analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis, and the factor analysis of CFAI was carried out. Results the Chinese CFAI contains 4 dimensions and 23 entries, the content validity index is 0.782, and the factor analysis shows 6 common factors. The cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.05%. The total score of CFAI was moderately negatively correlated with the total score of WHOQOL-BREF. The total score of Cronbach 伪 was 0.837, and the coefficient of correlation was 0.6040.941% P0.001.Conclusion Sinicized CFAI has good reliability and validity, and can be used to assess the weakness of the elderly in Chinese community.
【作者单位】：华北理工大学护理与康复学院;
【分类号】：R592

【相似文献】