不同民族2型糖尿病患者血清内脏脂肪素的比较分析
本文选题:2型糖尿病 + 内脏脂肪素 ; 参考:《青海大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的:对不同民族2型糖尿病患者visfatin水平的比较分析,观察不同民族间visfatin的变化。方法:随机选取三代及三代以上未进行异族通婚,在2015年-2016年期间在青海省人民医院门诊健康体检者105例(无慢性心脏疾患;肝肾功能正常;年龄小于82岁,大于25岁)。其中汉族36例,回族36例,藏族33例。同时选取三代及三代以上未进行异族通婚,在2015年-2016年期间在我院内科病房15楼住院的T2DM患者97例(符合目前国际上通用的WHO诊断标准(1999),年龄小于80岁,大于20岁)。其中汉族34例,回族31例,藏族32例。收集各组患者的年龄、性别、身高、体重、病程;然后收集生化及其它指标:SUA、ACR、Hb Alc、LDL-C、TC、HDL-C、TG、FPG、PPG、FINS、Hcy、VD3,并对数据进行统计学分析和处理。结果:1、在同一个民族间,年龄在NG与T2DM组,无统计学意义(P0.05)。2、3个民族间性别所占的构成比,在NG与T2DM组,无统计学意义(P0.05)。3、对照组中:(1)visfatin、SUA、TG、PPG、VD3回族均高于汉族,两者之间有统计学意义;TC、HDL-C汉族高于回族,两者之间有统计学意义。(2)visfatin、TG、PPG、VD藏族高于汉族,两者之间差异有统计学意义。(3)Hb A1c、TG、HDL藏族高于回族,两者之间差异有统计学意义。T2DM组中:(1)visfatin、Hb A1c、TG、Hcy,藏族高于汉族,两组间差异有统计学意义;(2)TG、FPG回族高于汉族,两组间差异有统计学差意义。(3)visfatin、Hb A1c、HDL-C、Hcy藏族高于回族,两组间差异有统计学意义;回族TG水平高于藏族,两组间差异有统计学意义。同一民族间比较:(1)visfatin、SUA、Hb A1c、TC、TG、HDL-C、ACR、Hcy、FPG、PPG、VD3在同一民族汉族间差异有统计学意义。且SUA、Hb A1c、TC、TG、HDL-C、ACR、Hcy、FPG、PPG,T2DM组均高于对照组;visfatin、VD3对照组高于T2DM组。(2)Hb A1c、TG、HDL-C、ACR、LDL-C、Hcy、FPG、PPG、VD3在同一民族回族间差异有统计学意义。且Hb A1c、TG、ACR、LDL-C、Hcy、FPG、PPG、T2DM组均高于对照组;HDL-C、VD3对照组高于T2DM组。(3)visfatin、Hb A1c、TC、TG、HDL-C、ACR、Hcy、FPG、PPG、VD3在同一民族藏族间差异有统计学意义,P0.05。且visfatin、Hb A1c、TC、TG、ACR、Hcy、FPG、PPG,T2DM组高于对照组;HDL-C、VD3对照组高于T2DM组。4、在非肥胖组中:(1)FPG在回族中高于汉族,两者之间有统计学意义;(2)visfatin藏族高于汉族、回族,差异有统计学意义;FPG回族高于藏族,两者之间有统计学意义。在肥胖组中:(1)TG、FPG回族高于汉族,两者之间有统计学意义;(2)visfatin、HDL-C、Hcy藏族高于回族,两者之间有统计学意义;TG回族高于藏族,两者之间有统计学意义;ACR水平藏族均高于汉族、回族,差异有统计学差异。同民族间比较:(1)肥胖组汉族、回族、藏族ACR均高于非肥胖组,差异有统计学意义。结论:在不同民族间2型糖尿病患者中visfatin水平是有差异的,藏族visfatin分别高于回族、汉族;visfatin与T2DM的发病机制有着潜在的联系,我们今后可能为治疗不同民族2型糖尿病患者提供一条新的途径。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare and analyze the level of visfatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from different nationalities and to observe the changes of visfatin in different nationalities.Methods: 105 patients (no chronic heart disease, normal liver and kidney function, < 82 years old, more than 25 years old) were selected randomly from the third generation and more than three generations who had no interracial marriage in the outpatient clinic of Qinghai Provincial people's Hospital from 2015 to 2016.There were 36 cases of Han nationality, 36 cases of Hui nationality and 33 cases of Tibetan nationality.At the same time, 97 T2DM patients who were not intermarried for three generations or more and hospitalized on the 15th floor of internal medicine ward in our hospital from 2015 to 2016 were selected (according to the current international WHO diagnostic standard / 1999), the age is less than 80 years old and the age is more than 20 years old.There were 34 cases of Han nationality, 31 cases of Hui nationality and 32 cases of Tibetan nationality.The age, sex, height, weight and course of disease of the patients were collected, and then the biochemical and other indexes were collected and analyzed statistically.Results in the same ethnic group, there was no significant difference between the age of NG and T2DM group, there was no significant difference in the proportion of sex composition among the three ethnic groups, and in NG and T2DM group, there was no significant difference in P0.05. 3. In the control group, the proportion of male and female in the control group was higher than that in the Han nationality.There was statistically significant difference between the Han nationality and the Hui nationality in HDL-C between the two groups, and there was a statistical significance between them. There was a significant difference between the two groups. The difference between them was statistically significant. The difference between them was higher than that of the Hui nationality, and the difference between them was higher than that of the Hui nationality, and the difference between the two groups was higher than that of the Han nationality, and the difference between the two groups was higher than that of the Hui nationality.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. The difference between the two groups was higher than that of the Hui nationality, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant.The TG level of Hui nationality was higher than that of Tibetan nationality, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant.There was a significant difference in HbA1cHbA1cT TGG (HDL-CU), Hcyl, FPG, PPGV, VD3 between the same ethnic group and the Han nationality of the same ethnic group compared with that of the same ethnic group.Moreover, there were significant differences between the two groups in the T2DM group and the control group. The difference was statistically significant between the control group and the control group. The difference was statistically significant between the two groups. The difference was statistically significant between the same ethnic group and the control group (P < 0.05). The difference was statistically significant between the control group and the control group (P < 0.05). The difference was statistically significant between the two groups in the same ethnic group. The difference was statistically significant between the control group and the control group (P < 0.05). The difference was statistically significant between the control group and the control group, which was higher than that in the control group and the control group was higher than that in the T2DM group.In addition, the levels of HDL-CnVD3 in T2DM group were higher than those in T2DM group. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P55.The difference was significant between the same ethnic group and the same ethnic group (P < 0.05). The results showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in HbA1cA1C, HcyFPGPPGVD3 and HDL-C1C T2DM group, and there was a significant difference between the two groups in the same ethnic group (P55.The difference between the two groups was significant (P < 0.05), and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The difference was significant (P < 0.05) between the two groups.Moreover, visfatinine HbA1c TCG, HcyFPGG, PPGN T2DM group was higher than control group HDL-CnVD3 control group was higher than T2DM group .4, in non-obese group, the FPG was higher in Hui nationality than that in Han nationality, there was statistical significance between them, there was significant difference between them, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the difference between them was higher than that of Han nationality (P < 0.05), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05) between the control group and the control group (P < 0.05).There is statistical significance between the two.In the obese group, the FPG level of the FPG was higher than that of the Han nationality, and there was statistical significance between the two groups. The Hcy of Hcy in HDL-Cy was higher than that of the Hui, and there was statistical significance between the two groups. The ACR level of the Hui nationality was higher than that of the Han nationality, and the level of ACR between the two groups was higher than that of the Han nationality and Hui nationality.The difference is statistically significant.The ACR of Han, Hui and Tibetan in obese group was higher than that in non-obese group, and the difference was statistically significant.Conclusion: there are differences in the level of visfatin among different nationalities in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The level of visfatin in Tibetan nationality is higher than that in Hui nationality. There is a potential association between visfatin and the pathogenesis of T2DM in Han nationality.We may provide a new approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes in different nationalities.
【学位授予单位】:青海大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R587.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蔡怀阳;李运泽;李莉;邹劲涛;涂强;;血浆内脏脂肪素在非酒精性脂肪性肝病中的表达及其意义[J];世界华人消化杂志;2014年19期
2 黄琳;陆付耳;陈广;;内脏脂肪素,一种新发现的肽类激素[J];生命的化学;2007年01期
3 马学斌;马骢;姚合斌;张雅芳;刘敏;常艳;;血清内脏脂肪素水平在2型糖尿病患者中升高[J];中国糖尿病杂志;2008年07期
4 曹宇;肖丽;姜德建;肖坚;;血浆内脏脂肪素水平与冠状动脉粥样硬化程度的相关性[J];中国动脉硬化杂志;2009年03期
5 华绍芳;韩玉环;;内脏脂肪素与妊娠[J];国际妇产科学杂志;2009年06期
6 邬宏剑;刘成国;汪大望;关艳丽;;2型糖尿病伴冠心病患者血浆内脏脂肪素水平的观察[J];中国糖尿病杂志;2009年10期
7 丁焕发;荣海钦;季虹;李玉璞;张勇;;2型糖尿病患者血清内脏脂肪素水平及其影响因素[J];中国糖尿病杂志;2009年04期
8 李劲松;杨丽霞;;内脏脂肪素与冠状动脉性心脏病的研究进展[J];心血管病学进展;2010年01期
9 孙霞;汪大望;武蓉珍;徐海燕;夏苏娇;陈凯;徐爱花;毛皓愉;;内脏脂肪素、脂联素、瘦素与肥胖、2型糖尿病的相关性研究[J];中国糖尿病杂志;2010年12期
10 任海艳;林黎明;张竹强;;内脏脂肪素的研究进展[J];包头医学院学报;2011年02期
相关会议论文 前8条
1 王新军;王继光;徐敏;杜鹏飞;温燕;王谷亮;罗雪梅;杨义生;杨军;刘建民;王卫庆;宁光;李小英;;自然人群中2型糖尿病患者与正常个体血清内脏脂肪素水平研究[A];2006年中华医学会糖尿病分会第十次全国糖尿病学术会议论文集[C];2006年
2 涂建成;周新;;前B细胞增强因子/内脏脂肪素的研究进展[A];第四届全国血脂分析与临床学术研讨会暨第九届全国脂蛋白学术会议论文汇编[C];2008年
3 杨艳;涂建成;周新;;内脏脂肪素基因启动子-3186位点多态性与糖尿病以及冠心病相关性研究[A];中华医学会第七次全国检验医学学术会议资料汇编[C];2008年
4 邱j;姚琪;陶袁;全军民;;慢性心力衰竭患者血浆内脏脂肪素水平及其影响因素的研究[A];2013年浙江省心电生理与起搏学术年会论文汇编[C];2013年
5 肖坚;姜德建;肖丽;曹宇;周知;李晓晖;李元建;;冠心病患者血浆内脏脂肪素与动脉粥样硬化的相关性研究[A];第九届全国心血管药理学术会议论文集[C];2007年
6 肖坚;姜德建;李元建;;冠心病患者血浆内脏脂肪素与动脉粥样硬化的相关性研究[A];药学发展前沿论坛及药理学博士论坛论文集[C];2008年
7 杨丽霞;齐峰;郭瑞威;;内脏脂肪素在冠心病患者中的发病学意义[A];第十三次全国心血管病学术会议论文集[C];2011年
8 崔小冰;万强;周凤华;赵晓山;孙学刚;杨静华;刁建新;鲁路;郑堰心;张蕾;张洪宇;贾钰华;;p38MAPK通路在内脏脂肪素诱导HUVEC细胞分泌TNF-α的作用及定心方的干预影响[A];第九次全国中西医结合基础理论研究学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2013年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 刘圣文;内脏脂肪素与冠心病[D];中国协和医科大学;2009年
2 肖坚;内脏脂肪素在动脉粥样硬化中的作用及机制研究[D];中南大学;2009年
3 张良燕;内脏脂肪素在糖尿病肾病发病机制中的作用初探[D];北京协和医学院;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 余飞兵;益肾清浊汤对慢性肾脏病3期肝肾阴虚证患者临床疗效及血清内脏脂肪素、层粘连蛋白影响的临床观察[D];福建中医药大学;2015年
2 王宏;不同民族2型糖尿病患者血清内脏脂肪素的比较分析[D];青海大学;2017年
3 侯云;冠状动脉支架置入24h血清内脏脂肪素变化[D];南方医科大学;2014年
4 刘益涛;维持性血液透析患者血浆内脏脂肪素水平及相关因素分析[D];天津医科大学;2010年
5 冯国跃;内脏脂肪素与传统心脑血管疾病危险因素相关性分析[D];济南大学;2014年
6 莫如芬;血清内脏脂肪素水平与2型糖尿病及其大血管病变的关系[D];广西医科大学;2009年
7 武丽娜;内脏脂肪素与冠心病的相关性研究[D];石河子大学;2014年
8 李雅飞;内脏脂肪素和可溶性血管细胞粘附分子-1在2型糖尿病肾病患者血清中的表达水平及其临床意义[D];苏州大学;2010年
9 刘晓宇;2型糖尿病合并高血压患者血清内脏脂肪素、脂联素水平的变化[D];重庆医科大学;2010年
10 胡荣;内脏脂肪素对人内皮祖细胞致炎作用及相关机制的研究[D];河北医科大学;2013年
,本文编号:1757713
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/nfm/1757713.html