当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 内分泌论文 >

多支病变合并糖尿病完全血流重建对比研究

发布时间:2018-05-19 11:42

  本文选题:糖尿病 + 多支病变 ; 参考:《浙江大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:背景和目的 糖尿病作为心血管疾病的独立危险因素,支架植入术后近远期支架内再狭窄率较不合并糖尿病者高,但大多的研究都未系统区分支架类型对试验结果影响。药物涂层支架可以通过抑制血管内膜及平滑肌增生,降低支架植入术后支架内再狭窄及靶血管再血流重建率。目前发表的多项研究表明合并糖尿病者的患者冠状动脉造影结果提示多支冠脉狭窄发生率增高。多支病变较单支病变支斑块更不稳定,心血管事件发生率高,同期或分期行完全血流重建治疗是安全可行的。目前国内关于多支病变合并糖尿病同期或分期单纯行药物支架完全血流重建预后的研究尚少,本研究旨在探讨糖尿病在血流动力学稳定的多支病变高危病例均行药物支架植入术后的预后影响。 资料和方法 连续收集临床2012年12月至2013年9月浙江大学医学院附属第二医院心血管内科住院的多支病变选择药物洗脱支架行完全血流重建病例共189例,合并糖尿病病例79例,不合并糖尿病患者110例,所有病例均处于血流动力学稳定,同期或90天内行PCI术且均为药物涂层支架植入,对狭窄冠脉主支及其主要分支行完全血流重建。分DM组和非DM组。统计两组病例一般资料:年龄、性别、吸烟史、高血压病史、脑梗死病史、糖化血红蛋白、血脂、术前LVEF,通过电话或门诊随访16-22月,记录两组病例术后随访期内MACE、支架内血栓形成及术后LVEF。 结果 按照纳入标准共189例病例纳入,DM组79例,非DM组110例,两组一般资料:年龄、性别、吸烟、高血压病史、脑梗死病史、血脂及术前LVEF无统计学差异(P0.05)。DM组平均糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)高于非DM组,差别具有统计学意义(P=0.000)。病变血管支数DM组2.31+0.47支,非DM组2.40+0.49支,DM组3支病变35例(44.3%,n=79),非DM组42例(38.1%,n=110),无统计学差异(P=0.0.192,P=0.398)。DM组合并CT017例(21.5%),非DM组28例(25.4%),两组间无差异(P=0.531)。随访16-22月,其中DM组及非DM组均无死亡病例。DM组3例再发心肌梗死(3.7%),非DM组1例再发心肌梗死(0.9%),两组间统计学上无差异(P=0.174)。DM组中有1例随访期内支架内血栓形成(1.2%),非DM组随访期内无支架内血栓形成,P=0.418。DM组6例病例支架内再狭窄大于50%伴心肌缺血症状予行再次血流重建治疗(7.5%),非DM组随访期内1例支架内再狭窄明显行血流重建治疗(0.9%),两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.044)。总MACE发生率方面,DM组共9例,非DM组共2例,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.014)。 结论 与不合并糖尿病患者相比,多支病变合并糖尿病同期或分期行PCI药物支架植入完全血流重建不增加全因死亡率、再发心肌梗死及支架内血栓形成,支架内再发狭窄、TVR及总MACE发生率高,符合目前研究结果。
[Abstract]:Background and purpose As an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the rate of in-stent restenosis after stent implantation is higher than that of non-diabetic patients. However, most studies have not systematically distinguished the effect of stent type on the results of the trial. Drug-coated stents can inhibit intima and smooth muscle proliferation and reduce the rate of stent restenosis and target vessel reflow reconstruction after stent implantation. Recent studies have shown that coronary angiography in patients with diabetes suggests an increased incidence of multiple coronary artery stenosis. Multivessel lesions are more unstable than single vessel plaques, and the incidence of cardiovascular events is higher. It is safe and feasible to complete blood flow reconstruction at the same time or by stages. At present, there are few studies on the prognosis of multivessel disease complicated with diabetes mellitus by drug stents complete blood flow reconstruction at the same time or stage. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic effects of drug stent implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who were at high risk of multivessel disease with stable hemodynamics. Information and methodology From December 2012 to September 2013, 189 patients with multivessel lesions in the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine affiliated to the second affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical College were selected for complete blood flow reconstruction by drug-eluting stents, and 79 cases were complicated with diabetes mellitus. All the patients were in stable hemodynamics. PCI was performed at the same time or 90 days with drug-coated stent implantation to reconstruct the main coronary artery and its main branches. The patients were divided into DM group and non DM group. Age, sex, smoking history, history of hypertension, history of cerebral infarction, glycosylated hemoglobin, blood lipids, preoperative LVEF, and follow-up by telephone or outpatient for 16-22 months were analyzed. Mace, stent thrombosis and postoperative LVEF were recorded in both groups. Result According to the inclusion criteria, 189 cases were included in DM group (79 cases) and non-DM group (110 cases). The general data of the two groups were age, sex, smoking, history of hypertension and history of cerebral infarction. There was no significant difference in serum lipids and preoperative LVEF. The average HbA1c in the DM group was higher than that in the non-DM group, and the difference was statistically significant. The number of vessel branches in DM group was 2.31 0.47, that in non-DM group was 2.40 0.49 branches, that in DM group was 44.3 and that in non-DM group was 38.1 and 0.398.DM and that in CT017 group was 21.55.There was no difference between the two groups. Follow up for 16-22 months, There were no death cases in DM group and non-DM group. There were 3 cases of recurrent myocardial infarction in DM group and 1 case in non-DM group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups. In the follow-up period, 1 case had thrombus formation in stent, and 1 case in non-DM group was followed up. Stent restenosis > 50% with myocardial ischemia symptoms in 6 patients without intrastenting thromboembolism. Reflow reconstruction therapy was performed in 6 cases. In non-DM group, one case with in-stent restenosis was obviously treated with blood flow reconstruction (0.9g / L) during the follow-up period. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.044). The incidence of MACE in DM group (9 cases) and non-DM group (2 cases) was significantly higher than that in control group (P 0.014). Conclusion Compared with patients without diabetes mellitus, complete blood flow reconstruction with PCI stent implantation did not increase overall mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction and intrastent thrombosis in patients with multiple vessel disease and diabetes mellitus at the same time or in stages. The incidence of TVR and total MACE was high, which was consistent with the present study.
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:R587.2

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 郭灵霞;司在霞;周敏;;7例冠心病患者行一站式杂交技术围手术期的观察及护理[J];当代护士(下旬刊);2013年12期

2 罗静;焦阳;于美丽;徐浩;;冠心病中西医结合真实世界研究的实践与思考[J];北京中医药;2013年11期

3 郜俊清;金惠根;严鹏勇;张文全;武前福;刘宗军;;壳聚糖/肝素西罗莫司药物洗脱支架对猪冠状动脉血栓形成及早期快速内皮化的作用[J];第二军医大学学报;2013年12期

4 丁怀玉;魏明丽;王俊杰;刘俊;朱皓;周旭晨;;新活素治疗急诊PCI术后急性前壁心肌梗死患者的临床观察[J];大连医科大学学报;2013年06期

5 胡艳;肖践明;;光学相干断层成像技术在冠心病临界病变中的应用[J];临床医学;2014年05期

6 张丽伟;盖鲁粤;;血管内光学相干成像技术检测易损斑块研究进展[J];第二军医大学学报;2014年06期

7 张敏;吴庆琛;;微创心脏外科手术研究进展[J];重庆医学;2014年19期

8 赵榆华;傅宴;雷婷;揭英纯;蒋溢为;唐杏彤;;替罗非班联合血栓抽吸在急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死急诊PCI中的疗效及安全性[J];广东医学;2014年13期

9 刘新锋;;血栓抽吸导管对小血栓负荷急性心肌梗死患者介入治疗的影响[J];中国医药科学;2015年02期

10 杨明;高长青;刘帅;吴扬;肖苍松;王嵘;;机器人分站式杂交技术治疗冠心病的近期随访[J];南方医科大学学报;2015年08期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 罗静;焦阳;于美丽;徐浩;;冠心病中西医结合真实世界研究的实践与思考[A];北京中医药学会2013年学术年会论文汇编[C];2013年

相关博士学位论文 前10条

1 刘娜;感觉神经肽对缺血后处理保护作用的影响及机制研究[D];山西医科大学;2013年

2 周程辉;内源性心肌保护措施:策略优化、新机制及临床影响因素分析[D];北京协和医学院;2013年

3 延荣强;冠状动脉临界病变斑块进展的危险分层和介入治疗策略[D];北京协和医学院;2013年

4 袁勃;两性离子嵌段共聚物结构设计、制备及其生物相容性研究[D];南京大学;2012年

5 韩勇;20-HETE对心肌缺血再灌注损伤及细胞凋亡的作用及机制研究[D];东北师范大学;2013年

6 陈丽华;乳酸杆菌对ApoE~(-/-)小鼠动脉粥样硬化形成的影响及机制研究[D];中南大学;2013年

7 侯志辉;冠状动脉CT对急性冠状动脉事件的随访研究[D];北京协和医学院;2013年

8 赵杰;光学相干断层成像评价猪冠状动脉药物洗脱支架置入后新生内膜覆盖的病理对比研究[D];北京协和医学院;2012年

9 金重赢;MicroRNA在雷帕霉素诱导的内皮细胞增殖和迁移抑制中的作用及机制[D];浙江大学;2013年

10 沈思思;多支血管病变对急性心肌梗死患者短期预后的影响[D];浙江大学;2013年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 张瑞环;高龄冠心病患者脂类代谢与冠状动脉粥样硬化相关性分析及急性心肌梗死介入治疗近期疗效分析[D];南方医科大学;2012年

2 孙百超;NF-κB介导的炎性反应与2型糖尿病在冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病中的作用[D];吉林大学;2013年

3 邓坤;钛表面层层自组装肝素-Ⅳ胶原涂层及其抗凝与促内皮化研究[D];西南交通大学;2013年

4 刘晨虎;冠心病不同血运重建方法的预后研究及相关危险因素分析[D];郑州大学;2013年

5 赵甲_g;心肌血流储备分数指导冠状动脉临界病变介入治疗的临床评价[D];河北医科大学;2013年

6 王璐阳;PI3K/Akt/AP-1通路对高糖培养血管平滑肌细胞增殖及CRP、IL-6、TNF-α表达的影响[D];河北医科大学;2013年

7 王百志;丹红对ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死PCI术后心肌无复流的影响及其机制的探讨[D];青岛大学;2013年

8 杨建新;急诊与非急诊介入治疗急性冠脉综合征患者冠脉造影特征的比较研究[D];广西医科大学;2013年

9 杨汉玖;双源CT评价体检人群冠状动脉粥样斑块合伴钙化与临床应用的研究[D];遵义医学院;2013年

10 牛洁婷;冠脉内预防性应用山莨菪碱对急性下壁心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠脉介入治疗后冠脉微循环的影响[D];河北医科大学;2013年



本文编号:1909961

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/nfm/1909961.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e3767***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com