当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 内分泌论文 >

PVP与PKP对骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折患者关节疼痛及关节功能影响的对比观察

发布时间:2018-12-29 10:31
【摘要】:目的对比分析经皮椎体成形术(PVP)与经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)对骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折患者关节疼痛及关节功能的影响。方法选择骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折患者60例,其中20例选择PVP治疗(PVP组),40例选择PKP治疗(PKP组)。两组分别于术前及术后1周、1个月、3个月、6个月时在静息状态和活动状态下采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评价关节疼痛程度;进行Oswestry功能障碍指数评分,评价关节功能恢复情况。结果治疗前两组静息及活动状态下VAS比较差异无统计学意义(P均0.05);PVP组术后1、3、6个月时静息及活动状态下VAS均低于术前,PKP组术后1周、1个月、3个月、6个月时静息及活动状态下VAS均低于术前,PKP组术后1周、1个月、3个月、6个月时静息及活动状态下VAS均低于同时间点PVP组,组间及组内比较P均0.05。两组术前Oswestry功能障碍指数评分比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);两组术后1周、1个月、3个月、6个月对Oswestry功能障碍指数评分均低于术前,PKP组降低更显著(P均0.05)。结论 PVP、PKP均可缓解骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折患者关节疼痛、促进关节功能恢复;PKP效果更好。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) on joint pain and joint function in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Methods 60 cases of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture were selected, 20 cases were treated with PVP (PVP group) and 40 cases were treated with PKP (PKP group). The degree of joint pain was evaluated by visual analogue score (VAS) before operation and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation. Oswestry dysfunction index score was used to evaluate the recovery of joint function. Results there was no significant difference in VAS between the two groups before treatment (P 0.05). VAS in the PVP group was significantly lower than that in the pre-operation group at 1 h, 6 months after operation and in the rest and active state at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after the operation in the PKP group, and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months after the operation in the PKP group, and 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after the operation in the PKP group. After 6 months of rest and activity, the VAS of PVP group was lower than that of PVP group at the same time point (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the score of Oswestry dysfunction index between the two groups before operation (P0.05). The scores of Oswestry dysfunction index at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation in both groups were lower than those before operation, especially in PKP group (P 0.05). Conclusion PVP,PKP can relieve joint pain and promote joint function recovery in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, and PKP is more effective.
【作者单位】: 北京市普仁医院;海军总医院;
【分类号】:R580;R687.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 韦正超;蔡道章;戎利民;王昆;董建文;金文涛;卢华定;;骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折临床治疗分析[J];中山大学学报(医学科学版);2003年S1期

2 邓红敏;;骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折的微创治疗进展[J];中国现代医药杂志;2009年11期

3 李卫峰;刘文革;王锋;;经皮球囊扩张椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折30例[J];福建医药杂志;2010年02期

4 胡勇;王健;;微创球囊扩张椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折[J];右江医学;2009年01期

5 蒋志勇,刘鑫,王春颖;老年性骨质疏松和椎体压缩性骨折椎体楔形变的鉴别[J];齐齐哈尔医学院学报;1999年03期

6 闫永起;郭从涛;刘玉成;刘敬武;刘伟;余胜全;赵国茂;唐卫东;王万强;;经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折21例[J];华北国防医药;2009年05期

7 陈文贵;肖立军;邓德礼;;PKP治疗骨质疏松性多节段椎体压缩性骨折的临床应用研究[J];中国骨与关节损伤杂志;2009年08期

8 王建;张年春;刘杰;田华科;陈超;;单侧入路经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗重度骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折[J];中国修复重建外科杂志;2009年01期

9 商敏;;DXA诊断椎体压缩性骨折的应用进展[J];中国骨质疏松杂志;2012年05期

10 袁凯;许树柴;程志安;杨文斌;;骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折的住院费用分析[J];中国骨质疏松杂志;2009年05期

相关会议论文 前5条

1 邓红敏;付义春;;骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折的微创治疗进展[A];第三届中西医结合脊柱及相关疾病学术年会论文集[C];2009年

2 黄其杉;池永龙;徐华梓;林焱;毛方敏;;经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折[A];第一届长三角地区创伤学术会议论文汇编[C];2008年

3 黄其杉;池永龙;徐华梓;林焱;毛方敏;;经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折[A];2008年浙江省骨科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2008年

4 黄其杉;池永龙;徐华梓;林焱;毛方敏;;经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折[A];浙江省中西医结合学会骨伤科专业委员会第十四次学术年会暨省级继续教育学习班论文汇编[C];2008年

5 杨蕊敏;;≥80岁73例骨质疏松生活质量8年评估[A];中华医学会第三次全国骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病学术会议暨骨质疏松诊断技术继续教育学习班论文汇编[C];2004年



本文编号:2394727

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/nfm/2394727.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户73506***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com