伊曲康唑与碘化钾治疗孢子丝菌病的临床观察与对照研究
[Abstract]:Background: spore filariasis is a common deep mycosis, which is caused by biphasic schenck spore filariasis, which is distributed all over the world and is prevalent in Northeast China. The incidence of spore mycosis is increasing in recent years. For the treatment of this disease, KI, is the first choice in China, but its limitation has affected the clinical application of KI, as a first-line drug for the treatment of this disease in Europe and the United States. However, there is still no prospective randomized controlled trial with a large sample to evaluate and compare the efficacy of ITC and KI, and there is no well-designed clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of KI. Objective: to determine the time, efficacy and safety of ITC and 10%KI in the treatment of dermatocystis. The clinical application value of these two drugs was evaluated. Methods: a prospective, randomized and controlled study was carried out in our dermatology department from January to July 2010. The patients were diagnosed as dermatocystis from January to July 2010. 81 patients were selected by inclusion and exclusion criteria. According to the random digital table method, the ITC group and the KI group were divided into two groups: the ITC100mg group and the KI group were given the 10%KI solution 10ml three times a day, and the information of the patients was registered in a unified form. The onset time, therapeutic effect and adverse reaction of the two groups were compared. T test is used for measurement data and Fisher exact probability method is used for counting data. Results among the 81 cases, 41 cases were included in the control group, 36 cases completed the treatment, 1 case failed in the treatment, 40 cases in the KI group, 39 cases in the control group, and 1 case in the control group. The total number of patients in treatment was 76, with a total loss of 5 cases. (1) General conditions: male 28 (36.8%), female 48 (63.2%), mean age 45.5 卤12.8 years, course of disease 20 days to 5 years, mean 7.5 卤8.9 months; 34 cases were fixed type (44.7%), 42 cases were lymphatic type (55.3%). There was no significant difference between the two groups in all aspects of general condition (p0. 05). (2). 6 cases (16. 2%) of the two groups were effective within 7 days, 11 cases (29. 7%) were effective within 7 days, 5 cases (13. 5%) were effective from 8 to 15 days and 1 case (2. 7%) from 16 to 30 days. In KI group, 16 cases (41.0%) were effective within 7 days (5.1%), 1 case (2.6%) in 8-15 day group, and 1 case (2.6%) in 16-30 day group. (3) 36 cases were cured in the control group, the average course of treatment was 2.36 卤0.91 months, the cure rate in 3 months was 86.5 and the cure rate in 6 months was 97.3B. 39 cases were cured in KI group, the average course of treatment was 1.97 卤0.79 months, the cure rate was 94.9 in 3 months and 100 in 6 months. There was no significant difference in the course of treatment between the two groups (p0.05). There was no significant difference in the cure rate between the two groups at 3 and 6 months (p0. 05). (4). The main adverse reactions of the two groups were headache and stomach discomfort, and the incidence of adverse reactions was mainly facial edema in the 16. 2% KI group, and there was no significant difference in the cure rate between the two groups (p0. 05). (4). The incidence of adverse reactions was 30.8%. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (p 0.05). Conclusion: (1) ITC and KI are safe and effective in the treatment of dermatocystis. (2) there is no difference in the efficacy of ITC and KI in the treatment of spore mycosis. (3) the onset of ITC is slower than that of KI.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:R756.6
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈学军,王尚兰;16例孢子丝菌病诊治分析[J];中国乡村医药;1997年06期
2 陈坚;梁尚清;;面部孢子丝菌病1例[J];中国皮肤性病学杂志;2009年03期
3 柴立,马淑文,谢珍珍,李玉堂,尤刚,张美莲;28例儿童孢子丝菌病临床分析[J];中华皮肤科杂志;1996年06期
4 戴耕武,汪正芳,丁正,邓英键;肌肉注射引起婴幼儿孢子丝菌病25例分析[J];中华儿科杂志;1997年11期
5 孙仁丽,杨本义;皮肤型孢子丝菌病12例临床分析[J];四川医学;2002年04期
6 严煜林;伊曲康唑治疗孢子丝菌病13例[J];中华皮肤科杂志;1996年04期
7 王迎林,王泽民,海莲;手术治愈巨大皮肤型孢子丝菌病1例[J];临床皮肤科杂志;1997年03期
8 朱明姬;丛宪玲;蒋忠民;姜日花;孙晶;贾玉玺;;伊曲康唑联合碘化钾治疗儿童孢子丝菌病[J];中国妇幼保健;2009年30期
9 ;苗圃工人孢子丝菌病的暴发[J];国外医学.卫生学分册;1998年05期
10 刘志远;毕连明;;碘化钾治疗14例皮肤型孢子丝菌病疗效观察[J];中华劳动卫生职业病杂志;1985年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 朱明姬;姜日花;蒋忠民;丛宪玲;孙晶;贾玉玺;;伊曲康唑联合碘化钾治疗儿童孢子丝菌病[A];中华医学会第十五次全国皮肤性病学术会议论文集[C];2009年
2 李珊山;;孢子丝菌病的治疗经验和存在的问题[A];2011全国中西医结合皮肤性病学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
3 柳风琴;刘丽娟;吴春燕;;13例孢子丝菌病的护理休会[A];全国内科护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2003年
4 李珊山;蔡晴;宋洋;姚蕾;于艳;钟淑霞;周俊锋;;鼻部孢子丝菌病36例临床分析[A];2010全国中西医结合皮肤性病学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
5 曹玉中;曹淑杉;代炳梅;;孢子丝菌病误诊45例临床分析[A];2001年中国中西医结合皮肤性病学术会议论文汇编[C];2001年
6 陈洪晓;李中伟;;孢子丝菌病的研究进展[A];2003中国中西医结合皮肤性病学术会议论文汇编[C];2003年
7 李珊山;宋洋;姚蕾;刘鹤松;钟淑霞;田亚萍;于艳;;三种疗法治疗皮肤型孢子丝菌病的对照研究[A];2010全国中西医结合皮肤性病学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
8 李玉安;郑陵吉;;62例儿童孢子丝菌病临床分析[A];中国菌物学会第三届会员代表大会暨全国第六届菌物学学术讨论会论文集[C];2003年
9 夏建新;牟妍;樊莎莎;王劲风;王平凡;王延龙;金学洙;;鼻部孢子丝菌病10例[A];中华医学会第十五次全国皮肤性病学术会议论文集[C];2009年
10 车敦发;曹扬;叶楠;倪通;倪容之;;斯皮仁诺治愈一例皮肤孢子丝菌病[A];2003中国中西医结合皮肤性病学术会议论文汇编[C];2003年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 秦士德;孢子丝菌最怕碘[N];健康报;2006年
2 青岛大学医学院皮肤科教授 秦士德;皮肤深处藏真菌[N];健康报;2007年
3 皮福;说说真菌性疾病[N];中国中医药报;2007年
4 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院 教授 郑岳臣;疑似肿瘤的真菌病[N];家庭医生报;2005年
5 胡亚莹;皮肤外伤可致着色芽生菌病[N];健康报;2005年
6 柏正宏;透视“注射”[N];中国中医药报;2003年
7 杨素萍;皮肤外伤可致着色芽生菌病[N];农村医药报(汉);2008年
8 江春;灰黄霉素在带状疱疹中的应用[N];农村医药报(汉);2007年
9 柏正宏;别让注射酿悲剧[N];中国医药报;2003年
10 中南大学湘雅二医院皮肤科 戴若玲;野外皮损莫小视[N];大众卫生报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 孔祥明;申克孢子丝菌分子生物学鉴定、分型及其与孢子丝菌病临床型别关系研究[D];中国医科大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘媛媛;伊曲康唑与碘化钾治疗孢子丝菌病的临床观察与对照研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
2 张青玲;伊曲康唑治疗儿童孢子丝菌病113例临床疗效观察[D];吉林大学;2011年
3 赵小利;孢子丝菌病的临床及病理研究(附30年病例复习)[D];吉林大学;2012年
4 吕莎;吉林省扶余地区35例儿童孢子丝菌病的分离菌株的基因鉴定[D];吉林大学;2012年
5 乔莉惠;联合药物治疗孢子丝菌病患者血清IgG、IgM、IgA检测[D];吉林大学;2010年
6 王贺;温热疗法与口服碘化钾溶液治疗孢子丝菌病模型小鼠疗效比较[D];中国医科大学;2010年
7 包宝龙;吉林省孢子丝菌病流行病学调查分析[D];吉林大学;2008年
8 霍姗姗;10%碘化钾溶液及两种剂量特比萘芬治疗孢子丝菌病的临床疗效观察[D];吉林大学;2012年
9 燕巍;孢子丝菌病的流行病学分析及T-DNA插入突变体的研究[D];吉林大学;2012年
10 张萍;新疆申克孢子丝菌PCR-RAPD基因分型研究[D];新疆医科大学;2010年
,本文编号:2209665
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/pifb/2209665.html