放松疗法联合高压电位治疗脑卒中后睡眠障碍的临床疗效

发布时间：2018-03-08 19:46

本文选题：脑卒中　切入点：睡眠障碍　出处：《中国老年学杂志》2016年22期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的分析放松疗法和高压电位治疗对脑卒中后睡眠障碍的治疗效果。方法选取60例脑卒中后睡眠障碍住院患者,随机分为三组,每组20例。对照组予以常规康复治疗;高压电位治疗组予以常规康复治疗加高压电位治疗;联合治疗组予以常规康复治疗加放松疗法联合高压电位治疗。各组患者常规的康复治疗方法相同。治疗前后各组行抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评定。结果对照组治疗前后3项评分均无明显差异(P0.05);高压电位治疗组治疗前后PSQI、SAS评分有明显差异(P0.05),但SDS评分无统计学差异(P0.1);联合治疗组治疗前后3项评分均有显著差异(P0.05)。治疗后高压电位治疗组和联合治疗组SDS、SAS、PSQI评分与对照组有明显差异(P0.05);联合治疗组SDS、SAS、PSQI评分较高压电位治疗组有明显差异(P0.05)。结论高压电位治疗可以改善脑卒中后患者的睡眠障碍,放松疗法联合高压电位治疗对脑卒中后患者的睡眠障碍有明显疗效。
[Abstract]:Objective to analyze the therapeutic effect of relaxation therapy and high pressure potential therapy on sleep disorder after stroke. Methods 60 inpatients with post-stroke sleep disorder were randomly divided into three groups, 20 cases in each group, and the control group was treated with routine rehabilitation. The patients in the high voltage potential group were treated with conventional rehabilitation therapy plus high voltage potential therapy. The patients in the combined treatment group were given routine rehabilitation therapy plus relaxation therapy combined with high pressure potential therapy. The routine rehabilitation methods of the patients in each group were the same. Before and after treatment, each group was given self-rating depression scale (SDS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), Pittsburgh Sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep quality). Results there was no significant difference in three scores before and after treatment in the control group, and there was a significant difference in the scores of PSQI before and after treatment in the high pressure potential treatment group (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the SDS score between the two groups (P 0. 1), while in the combined treatment group there was no significant difference in the three scores before and after treatment (P 0. 1). There were significant differences in the scores between the two groups after treatment (P 0.05). There was significant difference between the two groups in the score of SSA SSQI after treatment and that in the control group (P 0.05), and in the combined treatment group, there was a significant difference in the score of SDS SSA SSA PSQI between the two groups. Conclusion the high voltage potential therapy can be changed. [WT5 "HZ] [WT5BZ] the high voltage potential therapy in the combined treatment group is better than that in the high voltage potential group. Sleep disorders in patients with stroke, Relaxation therapy combined with high pressure potential therapy has obvious effect on sleep disorder after stroke.
【作者单位】：南通大学附属医院康复科;
【分类号】：R743.3;R740

【相似文献】