帕金森病与血管性帕金森综合征嗅觉功能与嗅球体积的改变研究
本文选题:帕金森病 + 血管性帕金森综合征 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2016年博士论文
【摘要】:第一部分帕金森病嗅球体积改变的系统评价与meta分析目的:系统评价帕金森病(PD)嗅球(OB)体积与正常对照(HC)组之间的差异。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase数据库,检索时限为建库至2015年1月。由两位研究者按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献、提取数据资料、评价文献质量,使用STATA12.0进行meta分析。采用亚组分析探索异质性来源,使用漏斗图、Begg’s和Egger’s检验评估发表偏移。结果:纳入病例-对照研究6篇,共216例PD患者,175例HC。Meta分析结果显示,PD组与HC组比较左、右两侧OB体积均显著减小,右侧均数差(MD)-8.071,95%可信区间(CI)(-14.721,-1.421);左侧MD-10.124,95%CI(-16.476,-3.773)。PD组内OB体积比较右侧较左侧显著增大,MD 1.168,95%CI(0.264,2.971);HC组内两侧OB体积比较无统计学差异。漏斗图、Begg’s和Egger’s检验未发现显著发表偏移,敏感性分析显示研究结果稳定、可靠。结论:PD左、右两侧OB体积均较HC显著减小。由于可纳入研究偏少且异质性显著,仍需新的高质量观察性研究进一步证实结论的稳定性。第二部分帕金森病和血管性帕金森综合征嗅觉功能改变的研究目的:研究帕金森病(PD)与血管性帕金森综合征(VP)的嗅觉功能改变及其影响因素,探讨Sniffin’Sticks方法(SST)嗅觉功能检查在PD诊断和鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法:选取2015年03月~2015年12月南通大学第二附属医院就诊的PD、VP患者及性别、年龄匹配的同期体检正常对照(HC)各40例。记录纳入对象年龄、性别、简易智能精神状态检查量表(MMSE)评分及PD组和VP组病程、HoehnYahr(H-Y)分级、帕金森病统一评分量表运动部分(UPDRS-Ⅲ)评分。采用SST检查方法分别评价pd、vp、hc三组嗅觉阈值(ot)、嗅觉辨别阈值(od)、嗅觉识别阈值(oi)及tdi总分,比较pd、vp、hc三组间嗅觉功能的差异,评估三组嗅觉功能与年龄、性别、mmse、病程、h-y分级、updrs-Ⅲ等变量的相关性。应用受试者工作特征曲线(roc)评价tdi在pd诊断中的价值。结果:pd、vp、hc三组间基线资料无统计学差异。pd组嗅觉障碍发生率为92.5%,vp组为37.5%,hc组为35%;pd组嗅觉障碍发生率明显高于hc组及vp组。三组tdi总分分别为pd组20.07±4.45,vp组30.53±5.90,hc组31.00±4.99,pd组tdi总分显著低于hc组和vp组,vp组与hc组间无统计学差异。hc组内tdi总分与年龄负相关(r=-0.987,p0.05),与mmse正相关(r=0.866,p0.05);pd组内tdi总分与病程负相关(r=-0.484,p0.05),与mmse正相关(r=0.618,p0.05),与性别、年龄、h-y分级及updrs-Ⅲ评分无关;vp组内tdi总分与年龄、病程、h-y分级负相关(分别为r=-0.989,p0.05;r=-0.770,p0.05;r=-0.353,p0.05),与mmse正相关(r=0.838,p0.05),与性别、updrs-Ⅲ评分无关。区分pd组和hc组时tdi总分曲线下面积(auc)为0.944,临界值为23.313,灵敏度为82.5%,特异度为97.5%;区分pd组和vp组时,tdi总分auc为0.911,临界值为23.563,灵敏度为87.5%,特异度为82.5%。结论:sst嗅觉检测方法临床应用简单、结果可靠、可操作性强。与hc及vp比较,pd患者存在较为显著的嗅觉障碍。vp嗅觉功能与hc比较无显著差异。使用sst能够为pd的诊断和鉴别诊断提供重要的参考信息。第三部分帕金森病和血管性帕金森综合征嗅球体积的改变研究目的:研究帕金森病(pd)与血管性帕金森综合征(vp)的嗅球(ob)体积变化及其影响因素,探讨磁共振(mri)ob体积测定在pd诊断和鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法:选取2015年03月~2015年12月南通大学第二附属医院就诊的pd、vp患者及性别、年龄匹配的同期体检正常对照组(hc)各40例。记录纳入对象年龄、性别、简易智能精神状态检查量表(mmse)评分及pd组和vp组病程、hoehnyahr(h-y)分级、帕金森病统一评分量表运动部分(updrs-Ⅲ)评分,评价pd、vp、hc三组嗅觉阈值(ot)、嗅觉辨别阈值(od)、嗅觉识别阈值(oi)及tdi总分。采用西门子verio3.0t超导型高分辨率全身mri成像仪和16通道头线圈测量pd、vp、hc三组左、右两侧ob体积,分别比较pd、vp、hc三组间左侧和右侧ob体积差异,评估三组左、右两侧ob体积与年龄、性别、mmse、病程、h-y分级、updrs-Ⅲ等变量的相关性。使用受试者工作特征曲线(roc)分别评价左、右两侧ob体积在pd诊断中的价值。结果:pd、vp、hc三组间基线资料无统计学差异。三组左侧ob体积分别为pd组32.00±4.60,vp组38.53±2.41,hc组38.85±2.47;三组间左侧ob体积比较差异具有显著性(p0.05)。pd组与hc组比较ob体积差异有显著性(p0.05);pd组与vp组比较ob体积差异有显著性(p0.05);hc组与vp组比较ob体积差异无统计学意义。三组右侧ob体积分别为pd组32.07±4.72,vp组38.56±2.51,hc组38.79±2.56;三组间右侧ob体积比较差异具有显著性(p0.05)。pd组与hc组比较ob体积差异有显著性(p0.05);pd组与vp组比较ob体积差异有显著性(p0.05);hc组与vp组比较ob体积差异无统计学意义。pd、vp、hc三组组内比较左、右两侧ob体积间差异均无统计学意义。hc组内左、右两侧ob体积均与年龄负相关(分别为r=-0.989,p0.05;r=-0.984,p0.05),与mmse正相关(分别为r=0.907,p0.05;r=0.901,p0.05)。pd组内左、右两侧ob体积均与mmse正相关(分别为r=0.427,p0.05;r=0.412,p0.05),与年龄、性别、病程、h-y分级、updrs-Ⅲ无关。vp组内左、右两侧ob体积均与年龄、病程负相关,与h-y分级、updrs-Ⅲ无关。hc组内左、右两侧ob体积均与tdi总分正相关(分别为r=0.978,p0.05;r=0.979,p0.05);pd组内左、右两侧ob体积均与tdi总分不相关;vp组内左、右两侧ob体积均与tdi总分正相关(分别为r=0.0.954,p0.05;r=0.933,p0.05)。区分pd组和hc组时左侧ob体积曲线下面积(auc)为0.883,临界值为35.055,灵敏度为67.5%,特异度为97.5%;右侧ob体积auc为0.872,临界值为35.646,灵敏度为67.5%,特异度为95%。区分pd组与vp组时左侧ob体积auc为0.879,临界值为34.721,灵敏度为67.5%,特异度为95%;右侧ob体积auc为0.869,临界值为35.650,灵敏度为67.5%,特异度为92.5%。结论:高分辨率mri能够清晰显影ob结构并准确测量ob体积。pd左、右两侧ob体积与hc及vp比较均明显减小,左、右两侧ob体积变化均与sst嗅觉功能变化无相关性。VP左、右两侧OB体积与HC比较均无统计学差异,左、右两侧OB体积与SST嗅觉功能变化趋势一致。测量OB体积能够为PD的诊断和鉴别诊断提供重要的参考信息。
[Abstract]:Part 1 systematic evaluation and meta analysis of the volume change of Parkinson's olfactory bulb: a systematic evaluation of the difference between the volume of the olfactory bulb (OB) and the normal control (HC) group of the Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods: the computer retrieved the PubMed, Embase database, and the retrieval time was built to January 2015. The two researchers were independently screened in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Literature, extracting data, evaluating the quality of literature, using STATA12.0 for meta analysis. Using subgroup analysis to explore the source of heterogeneity, using funnel map, Begg 's and Egger' s test to evaluate publication migration. Results: 6 cases of case control study were included in 216 cases of PD patients and 175 cases of HC.Meta analysis showed that PD group and HC group were left, right side OB. The volume was significantly reduced, the right mean number difference (MD) -8.071,95% confidence interval (CI) (-14.721, -1.421), the OB volume in the left MD-10.124,95%CI (-16.476, -3.773).PD group was significantly larger than that in the left side, and the MD 1.168,95%CI was significantly higher than that in the left side, and there was no statistical difference between the two sides of the group. The sensitivity analysis showed that the results of the study were stable and reliable. Conclusion: the OB volume of PD left and right side decreased significantly than that of HC. The stability of the conclusion was further confirmed by the new high quality observational study. Second part of the olfactory function changes of Parkinson's disease and vascular Parkinson syndrome. Objective: To study the changes of olfactory function and its influencing factors of Parkinson's disease (PD) and vascular Parkinson syndrome (VP), and to explore the application value of Sniffin 'Sticks method (SST) olfactory function examination in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PD. Methods: selected PD, VP patients and VP patients in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from 03 months to December 2015 2015 and Gender, age matched normal control (HC) 40 cases. Records included age, sex, simple intelligent mental state examination scale (MMSE) score and course of PD and VP, HoehnYahr (H-Y) classification, Parkinson's disease unified score exercise (UPDRS- III) score. The olfactory threshold of PD, VP, HC three groups was evaluated by SST method. Value (OT), olfactory discrimination threshold (OD), olfactory recognition threshold (OI) and TDI total score, compare the differences of olfactory function between groups of PD, VP and HC three groups, and evaluate the correlation between three groups of olfactory function and age, sex, MMSE, course of disease, H-Y classification, updrs- III and other variables. The value of the application of subjects' working characteristic curves (ROC) was used to evaluate the value of TDI in the three groups. The incidence of olfactory disorder in group.Pd was 92.5%, 37.5% in group VP and 35% in group HC. The incidence of olfactory disorder in group PD was significantly higher than that in group HC and VP. The total score of TDI in group three was 20.07 + 4.45, VP group 30.53 + 5.90, HC group 31 + 4.99, PD group was significantly lower than that of the group and group. There was no statistical difference between the group and the group. The total score of TDI in the group was negatively correlated with age (r=-0.987, P0.05), and was positively correlated with MMSE (r=0.866, P0.05). The total score of TDI in the PD group was negatively correlated with the course of the disease (r=-0.484, P0.05), and the positive correlation with MMSE (r=0.618) was not related to sex, age, classification and grade III score. 770, P0.05; r=-0.353, P0.05) and MMSE positive correlation (r=0.838, P0.05), independent of sex, updrs- III score. The area under the TDI total curve (AUC) under PD and HC is 0.944, the critical value is 23.313, the sensitivity is 82.5%, and the specificity is 97.5%. When the PD group and the group are distinguished, the total score is 0.911, the critical value is 23.563, the sensitivity is 87.5%, the specificity is 8. 2.5%. conclusion: the SST olfactory detection method is simple, reliable and operable. Compared with HC and VP, PD patients have significant olfactory impairment.Vp olfactory function and no significant difference between HC and HC. The use of SST can provide important reference information for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PD. Third parts of Parkinson's disease and vascular Parkinson Objective: To study the volume changes of the olfactory bulb (OB) of Parkinson's disease (PD) and vascular Parkinson syndrome (VP) and its influencing factors, and to explore the application value of OB volume of magnetic resonance (MRI) in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PD. Method: to select the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, 03 month, 2015, and December. PD, VP patients and sex, age matched normal control group (HC), 40 cases each. Records included age, sex, simple intelligent mental state examination scale (MMSE) score, PD group and group VP course, hoehnyahr (H-Y) classification, Parkinson's disease unified score exercise part (updrs- III) score, and evaluate PD, VP, HC three groups of olfactory threshold, Olfactory discrimination threshold (OD), olfactory recognition threshold (OI) and TDI total score. Use SIEMENS verio3.0t superconducting high resolution whole body MRI imaging instrument and 16 channel head coils to measure PD, VP, HC three groups left and right side ob volume. Compare the difference between the left and right sides of the PD, VP, HC three groups, and evaluate the volume and age, sex, and sex of the left and right sides of the three groups. The correlation between the course of disease, H-Y classification, updrs- III and other variables. The value of the OB volume in the left and right sides of the PD was evaluated using the working characteristic curve of the subjects (ROC). Results: there was no statistical difference between the three groups of PD, VP, HC. The left ob volume of the three groups was 32 + 4.60 in PD group, 38.53 in the VP group, 38.85 in the HC group, and in the three group left between the three groups. Compared with group HC, the volume difference between group.Pd and HC was significant (P0.05). The OB volume difference between group PD and VP group was significant (P0.05); HC group and VP group had no significant difference in ob volume. The three groups were 32.07 + 4.72, 38.56 + 2.51, 38.79 + 2.56, and the right volume between the three groups. The difference was significant (P0.05) between group.Pd and HC group (P0.05), and the difference of OB volume between group PD and VP group was significant (P0.05), and there was no statistical significance between HC and VP group, and there was no significant difference in the volume difference between the three groups. The product was negatively correlated with age (r=-0.989, P0.05, r=-0.984, P0.05), and the positive correlation with MMSE (r=0.907, P0.05; r=0.901, P0.05).Pd group, and the OB volume on both sides of the right side were all related to MMSE. A negative correlation between the course of the disease and the H-Y classification, updrs- III was not related to the.Hc group, and the OB volume on the right side was positively correlated with the total TDI score (r=0.978, P0.05; r=0.979, P0.05), and the OB volume in the left and right sides of the PD group was not related to the total TDI total. In group HC, the area under the left ob volume (AUC) is 0.883, the critical value is 35.055, the sensitivity is 67.5%, the specificity is 97.5%, the right ob volume AUC is 0.872, the critical value is 35.646, the sensitivity is 67.5%, the specificity is 95%. division PD group and VP group, the OB volume AUC is 0.879, the critical value is 34.721, the sensitivity is 67.5%, the specificity is 95%, and the right ob body. The product AUC is 0.869, the critical value is 35.650, the sensitivity is 67.5%, the specificity is 92.5%. conclusion: the high resolution MRI can clearly develop the OB structure and accurately measure the OB volume.Pd left. The OB volume on the right side is obviously decreased compared with HC and VP, and the left and right side OB volume changes are not related to the SST olfactory function. There is no statistical difference. The OB volume of left and right side is the same as that of SST olfactory function. The measurement of OB volume can provide important reference information for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PD.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R742.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘焯霖;帕金森病的诊治体会[J];新医学;2000年10期
2 张巍,雷征霖,孙秀兰,宋春莉;血管性帕金森综合征与帕金森病患者的临床对比分析[J];中华神经科杂志;2000年05期
3 刘萍,边强;尼古丁有助于帕金森病治疗[J];国外医药(合成药 生化药 制剂分册);2000年04期
4 王建,刘焯霖;帕金森病病因的新线索[J];国外医学(内科学分册);2000年04期
5 覃艳玲;帕金森病患者的护理体会[J];广西医科大学学报;2000年S1期
6 侯强,于长本;帕金森病伴发的抑郁[J];临床精神医学杂志;2000年06期
7 张巍,梁战华,雷征霖;肌萎缩侧索硬化症合并帕金森病1例报告[J];临床神经病学杂志;2000年03期
8 庄立;帕金森病的症状前指标[J];现代康复;2000年02期
9 刘泉开;帕金森病治疗的新进展[J];现代诊断与治疗;2000年02期
10 于嘉;帕金森病与临床用药[J];首都医药;2000年12期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 邹密;;老年帕金森病患者跌倒的危险因素及护理干预[A];中华护理学会全国第12届老年护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2009年
2 康婧;罗晓光;任艳;何志义;;应激诱发帕金森病的相关因素分析[A];中华医学会第十三次全国神经病学学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
3 李友海;田仰华;陈先文;汪凯;;帕金森病患者的时间感知研究[A];中华医学会第十三次全国神经病学学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
4 李如奎;;帕金森病研究进展[A];第三届全国中西医结合神经系统疾病学术会议论文集[C];2000年
5 杨晓军;李筱婷;;从中医角度探讨帕金森病[A];中国中西医结合学会成立20周年纪念大会论文集[C];2001年
6 周文泉;于向东;;对帕金森病研究的思索[A];第三次全国中西医结合养生学与康复医学学术研讨会论文集[C];2002年
7 韩蓉蓉;范亚瑜;吴集雄;徐晓华;刘汉伟;;帕金森病特殊类型的植物神经功能障碍——食性低血压[A];中华医学会第七次全国神经病学学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年
8 欧阳荔莎;;进行性核上性麻痹误诊为帕金森病1例[A];全国外科、神经内外科护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2006年
9 干静;周明珠;刘振国;陈伟;陆丽霞;吴佳英;;帕金森病患者自主神经功能障碍评估[A];第十一届全国神经病学学术会议论文汇编[C];2008年
10 史新冲;张祥松;易畅;;~(18)F-FDG PET/CT显像在帕金森病诊断中的应用[A];中华医学会第九次全国核医学学术会议论文摘要汇编[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 范又;如何早期发现帕金森病[N];光明日报;2006年
2 罗刚;近八成帕金森病患者看病不及时[N];健康报;2007年
3 蒋雨平;帕金森病认识四误区[N];家庭医生报;2007年
4 孙燕明;帕金森病患者要严防抑郁[N];中国消费者报;2007年
5 程守勤 蒋廷玉;帕金森病发病率居高不下[N];新华日报;2006年
6 杨锋;及早防范帕金森病[N];医药经济报;2006年
7 李尤佳;帕金森病——中老年人的“绊脚石”[N];中国中医药报;2006年
8 刘卫宏;帕金森病并非老年人的“专利”[N];中国中医药报;2007年
9 ;科学家发现:帕金森病早期确诊新法[N];新华每日电讯;2008年
10 程守勤;六成帕金森病人治疗不规范[N];健康报;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 王敏;帕金森病患者的辅助诊断与手运动补偿研究[D];华东理工大学;2012年
2 黄思菲;快动眼期睡眠行为障碍和帕金森病患者嗅觉分析及价值[D];复旦大学;2014年
3 高靓;CCL2在帕金森病轻度认知功能障碍中的作用及机制研究[D];南方医科大学;2015年
4 谷有全;TLR4在帕金森病小鼠中脑的表达及其对炎症介质释放的影响[D];南方医科大学;2014年
5 李红燕;早发型帕金森病患者的临床特征及维吾尔族早发型家族性帕金森病PARKIN基因突变的研究[D];安徽医科大学;2014年
6 胡盼盼;帕金森病患者的认知神经心理学研究[D];安徽医科大学;2014年
7 刘崴;帕金森病LRRK2和VPS35基因突变研究[D];天津医科大学;2012年
8 康文岩;α-突触共核蛋白在帕金森病发病机制及生物学标记物中的研究[D];上海交通大学;2012年
9 李桂花;新疆地区帕金森病危险因素、症状学和ATP13A2基因多态性研究[D];新疆医科大学;2015年
10 张迎春;帕金森病患者经颅超声影像学特点分析[D];苏州大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 康婧;应激诱发帕金森病的相关因素分析[D];中国医科大学;2010年
2 常崇旺;人工神经网络模型诊断帕金森病的研究[D];第四军医大学;2004年
3 陈伏祥;帕金森病轻度认知障碍患者脑灰质改变研究[D];福建医科大学;2015年
4 韩薇;α-突触核蛋白(SNCA)基因多态性与帕金森病易感性的meta分析[D];河北医科大学;2015年
5 王倩;帕金森病患者自主神经功能的研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年
6 刘疏影;不同帕金森病亚型(早发晚发型)的多巴胺转运体显像特征分析[D];复旦大学;2014年
7 徐睿鑫;杨明会教授治疗帕金森病学术经验研究[D];中国人民解放军医学院;2015年
8 李洋;帕金森病患者嗅觉相关脑区的MRI研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
9 李玲;早期帕金森病患者视网膜及视野改变的临床研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
10 程筱雨;血清反应因子在帕金森病发病中的作用和机制研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
,本文编号:1839204
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/shenjingyixue/1839204.html