急性前循环大血管闭塞脑梗死血管内治疗后颅内出血的预测因素及其对预后的影响
[Abstract]:Background and objective: intracranial hemorrhage is the main complication of intravascular therapy for acute cerebral infarction. The incidence of hemorrhage after recanalization in various clinical studies is different. Among them, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage is particularly important. Early identification of the risk factors is of great significance for treatment decision and improvement of clinical prognosis. Further study on the prognosis of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after intravascular treatment of intracerebral hemorrhagic cerebral infarction is still needed. Furthermore, the risk factors for death in patients with no secondary intracranial hemorrhage are not clear after successful recanalization. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the comprehensive evaluation of intravascular therapy and standard drugs for acute cerebral infarction by meta analysis. Whether the risk of bleeding increased in comparison with the risk of bleeding; 2) the incidence and risk factors of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after endovascular treatment in Chinese patients with acute anterior circulation macrovascular occlusion, and 3) to assess the effect of asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage on the prognosis of 90 days after endovascular treatment in Chinese patients with acute anterior circulation large vascular occlusion; 4) assessment Methods collected from January 2014 to June 2016, ACTUAL database patient data.ACTUAL is a real world acute cerebral infarction intravascular treatment registration study. This study was studied. The center ethics committee approved the study. According to the current guidelines for acute ischemic stroke, intravascular therapy and other drug treatment were performed. Non enhanced cranial CT examinations were performed in each case before treatment to exclude cerebral hemorrhage, CTA, MRA, and DSA, and to determine acute occlusion of the large arteries. 24 and 72 hours after treatment, the head CT examination was performed respectively. The diagnosis and classification of intracranial hemorrhage are determined according to the criteria for the classification of Heidelberg bleeding. Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test is used depending on whether the continuous variables are in accordance with normal distribution. The independent risk factors for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death are evaluated by chi square test or Fisher exact test. using a logistic retrospective analysis. Meta analysis synthetically evaluated the increase of bleeding risk compared with the standard drug treatment in acute cerebral infarction. Results the total intracerebral hemorrhage risk in the intravascular treatment group was higher than that of the drug treatment group (35.0%vs 19%, OR=2.55,95%CI:1.64-3.97, P0.0001); the intravascular treatment group of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar to the drug treatment group and had no statistics. Differences (5.6%vs 5.2%, OR=1.09,95%CI:0.79-1.50, P=0.61); intravascular therapy for asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (28%vs 12%, OR=3.16,95%CI:1.62-6.16; P0.001). Baseline neutrophils ratio 0.83 (OR=2.07,95%CI, 1.24-3.46), preoperative ASPECTS6 (OR=2.27,95%CI, 1.24-4.14), cardiac apoplexy, lateral branch OR=1.97,95%CI (1.16-3.36), the onset of symptoms began to delay 270 minutes of femoral artery puncture time (OR=1.70,95%CI, 1.03-2.80), and the number of embolus more than 3 times (OR=2.55,95%CI, 1.40-4.65) was an independent risk factor for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after intravascular treatment of acute anterior circulatory cerebral infarction. Acute anterior circulation large vascular occlusion Asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after cerebral infarction was reduced to 90 days of good functional prognosis (excellent outcome, mRS score 0-1), (OR=0.46,95%CI, 0.28-0.77, P=0.003), and decreased the probability of obtaining functional independence (functional independence, mRS score 0-2) (OR=0.61,95%CI, 0.39-0.96, P=0.032). But there was no death rate for 90 days. OR=0.62,95%CI, 0.33-1.14, P=0.125).Age75 (OR=2.68,95%CI, 1.34-5.34), baseline neutrophils ratio 0.83 (OR=2.38,95%CI, 1.23-4.59), before treatment ASPECTS6 (vs > 8, OR=4.76,95%CI, 1.84-12.33). A occlusion (vs M1 occlusion, OR=2.26,95%CI, 1.15-4.44) may increase the 90 day risk of death in patients with successful recurrent and asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusion 1. although the risk of intracranial hemorrhage is higher after intravascular treatment in acute cerebral infarction, the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage is not increased compared with standard drug treatment; 2. cardiogenic stroke, collateral branch Poor circulation, delayed treatment, repeated thrombectomy, low ASPECTS score before treatment and increased baseline neutrophils ratio, increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage secondary to acute anterior circulation cerebral infarction patients after mechanical thrombectomy,.3. Chinese patients with acute anterior circulation large vascular occlusion, and asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy. The risk of good functional prognosis for 90 days is low. Clinicians need to take appropriate measures to reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (either symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage) after mechanical thrombectomy. After successful repassage, there are still some patients who died within 90 days despite no secondary intracranial hemorrhage. Age, baseline neutrophils,.4. Elevated cell ratio, hyperglycemia, low ASPECTS, high NIHSS score and ICA occlusion were independent risk factors for 90 day mortality.
【学位授予单位】:南方医科大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R743.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 胡军民,束枫,马廉亭,秦尚振,余泽,徐国政,龚杰,杨铭,李俊;自发性蛛网膜下腔出血的造影时机及血管内治疗方法选择[J];中华急诊医学杂志;2003年01期
2 胡军民 ,束枫 ,马廉亭 ,秦尚振 ,余泽 ,徐国政 ,龚杰 ,杨铭 ,李俊~~;自发性蛛网膜下腔出血的造影时机及血管内治疗方法选择[J];中华急诊医学杂志;2003年02期
3 马廉亭;神经外科血管内治疗的国内外进展[J];中华神经外科杂志;1993年04期
4 郭永平,王耀武,张兰;外伤性颈动脉海绵窦瘘的血管内治疗(附6例报告)[J];长治医学院学报;1998年03期
5 凌锋;第四届全国神经外科血管内治疗研讨会[J];中华医学信息导报;1998年02期
6 ;第五届全国神经外科血管内治疗专题研讨会会议征文[J];中华神经外科杂志;1999年02期
7 张跃伟,黄正松,王光伟,丛培生,崔国祥,姜宇东,高鹏;内皮素在血管内治疗迟发性脑血管痉挛前后含量变化的实验研究[J];临床放射学杂志;2001年07期
8 黄正松,石忠松,齐铁伟,戴钦舜;血管内治疗迟发性症状性脑血管痉挛10例报告[J];中国神经精神疾病杂志;2001年02期
9 王健,沈建康,林东,赵卫国,胡锦清;颅内动脉瘤手术和血管内治疗的适应证和疗效分析[J];外科理论与实践;2002年04期
10 袁桂清;我国神经外科血管内治疗的研究进展[J];中华医学信息导报;2002年12期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 何丽婵;何锐;王慕真;梁瑞华;张素平;;多部位动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的血管内治疗[A];第九次全国神经病学学术大会论文汇编[C];2006年
2 岳炫烨;席刚明;秦碧勇;张迎春;刘瑞华;庄凤娟;;血管内治疗重症颅内静脉窦血栓形成[A];湖北省神经科学学会学术年会论文汇编[C];2007年
3 徐鹏;蒋定尧;陈贤宜;陈英;;未破裂颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗评估:前瞻性、随机、对照试验研究[A];中华医学会第十八次全国放射学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
4 沈建康;;高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的治疗策略探讨[A];2011中华医学会神经外科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
5 王斌;那世杰;杨咏波;孙剑涛;黄玉杰;;大脑后动脉动脉瘤的血管内治疗[A];2011中华医学会神经外科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
6 吴中学;姜除寒;;脑血管病血管内治疗新进展[A];中国医师协会神经外科医师分会成立大会资料汇编[C];2004年
7 吴中学;姜除寒;;脑血管病血管内治疗新进展[A];海峡两岸神经外科学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2005年
8 曾博;鲁祥和;李则群;谭显西;钟鸣;;影响高分级颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗预后的相关因素分析[A];2011年浙江省神经外科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2011年
9 王凡;隋建美;杨华;胡阳春;;脑血管病血管内治疗并发症及其处理[A];第二届西部神经外科学术会议论文集[C];2010年
10 李钢;夏鹰;陈焕雄;颜山;李智勇;;颅内静脉窦血栓形成的诊断和血管内治疗[A];2011中华医学会神经外科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 熊昌彪;以“大医精诚”为主题[N];中国医药报;2007年
2 刘铁桥 邢秋华 李玉宝;马廉亭:脑血管内“舞刀弄枪”[N];大众科技报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前9条
1 李立;颅内复杂动脉瘤的DSA评价与血管内治疗的临床研究[D];郑州大学;2016年
2 李钊硕;后循环复杂型动脉瘤血管内治疗的临床研究[D];郑州大学;2016年
3 王怀明;急性前循环大血管闭塞性卒中优化血管内治疗策略的多中心临床研究[D];第二军医大学;2017年
4 郝永岗;急性前循环大血管闭塞脑梗死血管内治疗后颅内出血的预测因素及其对预后的影响[D];南方医科大学;2017年
5 曹月洲;早期神经功能改变与介入治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者预后的关系研究及其相关预测因素[D];南方医科大学;2017年
6 顾大群;颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗临床研究[D];南方医科大学;2013年
7 刘加春;影响颅内宽颈动脉瘤血管内治疗策略的相关因素研究[D];北京协和医学院;2012年
8 金星;硬脑膜动静脉瘘预后因素分析及血管内治疗的临床研究[D];浙江大学;2015年
9 孟雷;破裂性颅内复杂动脉瘤的临床研究及SAH并发远隔脏器损害的实验研究[D];山东大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 谢冰森;高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后的影响因素分析[D];福建医科大学;2015年
2 尚飞;椎—基底动脉夹层动脉瘤影像学诊断及血管内治疗分析[D];新乡医学院;2015年
3 胡骁;海绵窦区硬脑膜动静脉瘘血管内治疗的疗效评价[D];第四军医大学;2015年
4 阿西木江·阿西尔;颅内后循环动脉瘤的血管内介入治疗疗效评价[D];新疆医科大学;2016年
5 王斌;颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗术后的相关临床随访研究[D];南京医科大学;2016年
6 王昆;血管内治疗颈内动脉眼动脉段动脉瘤的临床研究[D];皖南医学院;2016年
7 张晓杰;高危颈动脉慢性闭塞患者血管内治疗的疗效分析[D];新疆医科大学;2017年
8 董洋;急性缺血性脑卒中患者血管内治疗的临床效果分析[D];山东大学;2017年
9 冯光;颅内动脉瘤破裂出血超早期、早期血管内治疗的临床研究[D];暨南大学;2005年
10 吴一平;颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗[D];浙江大学;2008年
,本文编号:2173059
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/shenjingyixue/2173059.html