当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 神经病学论文 >

痉挛性斜颈中感觉诡计的临床特征以及感觉诡计与空间辨别觉关系的探究

发布时间:2018-08-13 21:18
【摘要】:背景: 痉挛性斜颈(cervical dystonia, CD)是局灶性肌张力障碍的常见类型,主要临床表现为颈部肌肉的异常收缩导致了头颈部的姿势异常和/或运动增多。而感觉诡计(sensory trick, ST)现象是其经典的临床特征之一。感觉诡计是指患者可以通过一些特定的动作,暂时减轻斜颈的姿势和运动异常。根据感觉诡计是否需要用力,可将其分为“经典型”感觉诡计(classical sensory trick, CST)和“用力型”感觉诡计(forcible sensory trick, FST)。感觉诡计的方向与头偏转的方向之间是否有关仍存在争议。感觉诡计的有效程度、作用时间长短究竟与哪些因素相关;CST与FST的作用机制是否相同;FST是否仅仅通过对抗异常运动发挥作用;这些问题都没有定论。感觉诡计的机制仍是不解之谜。除感觉诡计现象外,还有许多证据表明局灶性肌张力障碍的患者存在感觉系统的异常,如时间辨别觉与空间辨别觉的异常。这些异常与感觉诡计的有效性之间是否相关也尚无定论。 目的: 本研究通过调查痉挛性斜颈患者中感觉诡计的临床特征及其相关因素,着重对比“经典型”感觉诡计与“用力型”感觉诡计,结合感觉诡计与空间辨别觉之间关系的研究,探究感觉诡计的作用机制。 方法: 对北京协和医院神经科运动障碍专病门诊的痉挛性斜颈患者进行标准问卷调查与临床评估,具体包括患者的一般情况、起病年龄、病程长短、病情加重缓解因素和感觉诡计详细情况。使用TSUI评分评估患者的斜颈严重程度。 使用J.V.P Domes套件测定痉挛性斜颈患者与健康受试者的触觉空间辨别觉阈值(Spatial Discrimination Threshold,SDT)。对比健康受试者、感觉诡计使症状完全缓解的CD患者、感觉诡计使症状部分缓解的CD患者以及感觉诡计无效的CD患者之间的SDT是否不同。 所有数据均录入SPSS22.0中进行统计分析。 结果: 在纳入研究的240名痉挛性斜颈患者中,有75%的患者在接受调查时存在感觉诡计。感觉诡计常见的形式较为多样,多数表现为手触摸头颈部的某一部位。一个患者可有多种感觉诡计。多数患者认为感觉诡计对症状的缓解不如肉毒毒素。与FST组相比,CST组的患者年龄较小、起病年龄较小、病程较短、TSUI评分较低,且CST组的患者感觉诡计效果更好、持续时间更长(p0.05), CST组患者的感觉诡计有效程度和持续时间均与TSUI评分相关(p0.05)。FST组患者中,多数患者(55.5%)为头偏转同侧的感觉诡计更为有效。但CST组与FST组均有部分患者双侧感觉诡计有效程度相等(分别为39.2%和11.1%),CST组双双侧感觉诡计有效程度相等的患者比例更高(p0.05)。靠近不触摸、想象、双手伸直上举这3个动作在FST组的患者中有效率均显著低于CST组患者(p0.05)。健康受试者与CD患者之间以及感觉诡计效果不同的CD患者之间未发现SDT存在显著性差异(p0.05)。 结论: 绝大多数痉挛性斜颈的患者在病程中会出现感觉诡计。与FST的患者相比,CST的患者斜颈程度较轻,感觉诡计更为有效,持续的时间也更长。FST并非单纯通过对抗异常运动来缓解症状,但与CST相比,FST更依赖于触觉刺激。感觉诡计的机制十分复杂,它的作用可能分为两个阶段:①使头从姿势异常恢复到正位,②维持头部的正常姿势。FST与CST的不同之处可能在于,在斜颈程度较重的患者中,需要施加力量即使用FST使头恢复到正位。而在维持头部位置正常的过程中,FST与CST的机制是类似的。除了触觉刺激外,本体感觉刺激、运动觉刺激、温度觉刺激、视觉听觉刺激甚至想象感觉诡计均可使某些肌张力障碍的患者症状减轻。感觉诡计可能是通过多种感觉刺激的整合,改变了大脑皮层的激活模式,降低了异常的皮层内易化,从而使症状暂时缓解。感觉诡计对肌张力障碍的治疗有一定的指导意义,但仍需要进一步的研究以证实。
[Abstract]:Background:
Spastic torticollis (CD) is a common type of focal dystonia. The main clinical manifestation is abnormal contraction of cervical muscles, which results in abnormal head and neck posture and/or increased movement. Sensory trick (ST) is one of the classical clinical features of CD. Sensory trick refers to the ability of a patient to pass through a single sensory trick. Certain movements temporarily relieve the posture and movement abnormalities of the torticollis. According to whether sensory cunning requires exertion, it can be divided into classical sensory trick (CST) and forcible sensory trick (FST). Whether the direction of sensory cunning is related to the direction of head deflection remains. There are controversies about the effectiveness and duration of sensory cunning; whether CST and FST work in the same way; whether FST only works against abnormal movements; and whether these questions are not conclusive. There are sensory abnormalities in patients with focal dystonia, such as temporal and spatial abnormalities. Whether these abnormalities are related to the effectiveness of sensory cunning is not conclusive.
Objective:
By investigating the clinical features and related factors of sensory cunning in patients with spastic torticollis, this study compared the classical sensory cunning with the forced sensory cunning, and explored the mechanism of sensory cunning combined with the relationship between sensory cunning and spatial discrimination.
Method:
Standard questionnaire survey and clinical evaluation were conducted on the patients with spastic torticollis in the neurological department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, including general condition, age of onset, duration of illness, remission factors of aggravation and sensory trickery.
Spatial Discrimination Threshold (SDT) was measured in spastic torticollis patients and healthy volunteers using the J.V.P Domes suite. Compared with healthy volunteers, the SDT between CD patients with complete remission of symptoms by sensory cunning, CD patients with partial remission of symptoms by sensory cunning and CD patients with ineffective sensory cunning were It's not different.
All data were entered in SPSS22.0 for statistical analysis.
Result:
Of the 240 patients with spastic torticollis included in the study, 75% had sensory cunning at the time of the study. Sensory cunning was more common in a variety of forms, mostly by touching a part of the head and neck. One patient could have multiple sensory cunning. Most patients thought sensory cunning was less effective than botulinum toxin in relieving symptoms. Compared with group T, CST patients were younger, younger onset age, shorter course of disease, lower TSUI score, and CST patients felt better trickery effect, longer duration (p0.05). The efficacy and duration of sensory trickery in CST patients were correlated with TSUI score (p0.05). Most patients (55.5%) in FST group were head deflection ipsilateral. Sensory cunning was more effective. However, some patients in CST and FST groups had the same degree of efficacy in bilateral sensory cunning (39.2% and 11.1% respectively). The proportion of patients in CST group with the same degree of efficacy in bilateral sensory cunning was higher (p0.05). The efficiency of the three movements in FST group was significantly lower than that in CST group. There was no significant difference in SDT between healthy subjects and CD patients or between CD patients with different sensory cunning effects (p0.05).
Conclusion:
The vast majority of patients with spastic torticollis develop sensory cunning during the course of their illness. CST patients have less torticollis, more effective sensory cunning, and longer duration than FST patients. FST does not relieve symptoms simply by confronting abnormal movements, but is more dependent on tactile stimuli than CST. The difference between FST and CST may be that, in patients with severe torticollis, a force is needed to restore the head to its normal position, while in the process of maintaining normal head position, FST and CST are required. In addition to tactile stimuli, proprioceptive stimuli, motor stimuli, thermosensory stimuli, visual and auditory stimuli, and even imaginative sensory cunning can alleviate symptoms in some patients with dystonia. Sensory cunning may change the activation pattern of the cerebral cortex and reduce abnormal cortex through the integration of multiple sensory stimuli. Sensory cunning has a guiding role in the treatment of dystonia, but further research is needed to confirm it.
【学位授予单位】:北京协和医学院
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:R746

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈颖;周莉;;中西医结合治疗痉挛性斜颈1例[J];北京中医药大学学报(中医临床版);2013年03期

2 韩永升;陈林;杨任民;;家族性特发性震颤合并痉挛性斜颈的临床特点(附2例报告)[J];临床神经病学杂志;2014年05期

3 宋颖;王哲;赵智江;陈立英;魏桂芬;;痉挛性斜颈48例A型肉毒毒素治疗疗效分析[J];山西医药杂志(下半月刊);2013年07期

4 Esteban Pe?a;;Treatment with botulinum toxin: An update[J];World Journal of Neurology;2013年03期

5 王莉;胡兴越;刘海;章士正;;书写痉挛脑功能磁共振成像研究[J];中华神经科杂志;2006年10期

6 ;Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of writer's cramp[J];Chinese Medical Journal;2006年15期

7 刘青蕊,贺丹,赵静霞,王英;特发性颈部肌张力障碍研究的新进展[J];中国煤炭工业医学杂志;2001年01期

8 马凌燕;万新华;;痉挛性斜颈及其诊疗[J];协和医学杂志;2012年03期

9 吴逸雯;陈生弟;;肌张力障碍遗传学发病机制及诊断策略[J];中国现代神经疾病杂志;2013年07期

10 卢祖能;;肌张力障碍的新定义和分类[J];卒中与神经疾病;2014年01期

相关博士学位论文 前6条

1 胡兴越;书写痉挛脑功能磁共振成像研究[D];浙江大学;2005年

2 田原;口下颌肌张力障碍全脑灰质形态学研究、危险因素及生命质量调查[D];北京协和医学院;2013年

3 陈逸;痉挛性斜颈肉毒毒素治疗前后脑功能磁共振成像研究[D];北京协和医学院;2012年

4 王琳;重复经颅磁刺激对局灶型肌张力障碍的治疗研究[D];北京协和医学院;2014年

5 马凌燕;原发性肌张力障碍的遗传学研究[D];北京协和医学院;2014年

6 陆艺;肌张力障碍性震颤临床及电生理特征研究[D];北京协和医学院;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前9条

1 王莉;肉毒毒素治疗前后书写痉挛脑功能磁共振成像研究[D];浙江大学;2006年

2 汪晓楠;良性特发性眼睑痉挛的发病危险因素分析[D];中国协和医科大学;2010年

3 葛晗明;A型肉毒毒素对原发性眼睑痉挛中枢感觉传导通路影响的研究[D];大连医科大学;2012年

4 周丽娜;皮层多点记录的体感诱发电位检测方法对局灶型肌张力障碍病的研究价值[D];大连医科大学;2012年

5 张伟;肌张力障碍患者的认知、情感和睡眠障碍及疼痛对生活质量的影响[D];昆明医科大学;2013年

6 邹健龙;应用巢式PCR方法检测痉挛性斜颈多巴胺D5受体基因突变[D];广西医科大学;2014年

7 张巍;甲状腺功能亢进患者脑结构及功能改变的磁共振成像研究[D];第三军医大学;2014年

8 姚晴宇;A型肉毒毒素治疗痉挛性斜颈的长期有效性及相关因素的临床分析[D];苏州大学;2014年

9 肖芳;经颅超声对肌张力障碍与帕金森病的临床应用研究[D];苏州大学;2014年



本文编号:2182215

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/shenjingyixue/2182215.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户ccf36***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com