CADASIL患者的临床、影像学特征及NOTCH3基因突变研究
[Abstract]:Research background and purpose
Autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is a non-atherosclerotic, non-amyloid, inherited arterial disease, and a monogenic, inherited stroke disease in adults. The clinical manifestations and imaging features of CADASIL are complex and changeable, and the diagnosis still depends on skin biopsy or gene detection. At present, the deposition of osmium-phagocytic granules in the smooth muscle cells of cutaneous arterioles is considered to be a characteristic pathological change of CADASIL. However, electron microscopy (EM) is used to evaluate osmium-phagocytic granules in cutaneous arterioles. Insufficient sensitivity, false negative rate can be as high as 50%; different studies also show that the sensitivity of the test is very different. Therefore, NOTCH3 gene mutation detection is still the gold standard for the diagnosis of CADASIL.
More than 190 NOTCH3 gene mutations, including missense point mutation, shear mutation and deletion mutation, have been found in more than 500 families worldwide. Of these mutations, 95% are point mutations, and almost 90% are located in exons 2-6, especially exons 4 and 3. For this reason, the above-mentioned limited exons were examined in clinically suspected patients. Rapid diagnosis can be made. However, recent studies have found that CADASIL patients in different regions have different gene mutation prone sites and gene detection rates, which may be due to racial differences, but there may also be other factors, because even in the same ethnic group, patients in different regions of the gene mutation prone sites are not there. So far, there is no obvious aggregation of exon mutations reported in China, and the mutations are located in exons 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 11, 18 and 20, and there is no large sample OTCCH3. Detection rate of gene mutation.
Because there are 33 exons in OTCH3 gene, the mutation sites detected are widely distributed in exon 2-23. The detection of gene mutation is expensive and time-consuming, so it can not be used as a routine method to diagnose diseases. Detection of patients is also one of the hot topics in clinical research.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the mutation of NOTCH3 gene exon 2-23 in a group of patients suspected of CADASIL, and to compare the clinical and imaging features of NOTCH3 gene mutation in order to (1) understand the mutation of NOTCCH3 gene in this group, diagnose and understand the hot spot distribution of gene mutation in CADASIL patients in China. (2) According to the results of gene detection, the clinical characteristics and imaging characteristics of mutation group and non-mutation group were compared and analyzed, and the clinical characteristics and imaging characteristics of patients in mutation group were analyzed, so as to find out the suitable gene for gene diagnosis. The effective characteristics of screening.
The research includes the following two parts:
Part one research on the mutation of WTCH3 gene
objective
To determine the mutation of NOTCH3 gene in this group, to diagnose and understand the hotspot distribution of gene mutation and the detection rate of gene mutation in CADASIL patients in China, and to provide the basis for the establishment of appropriate genetic diagnosis process.
Method
The exon 2-23 mutation of NOTCH3 gene was analyzed in 35 suspected CADASIL patients from 35 unrelated families in eastern China, and the corresponding mutation exons were detected in 17 members of 8 families with NOTCH3 gene mutation in the proband, and 100 normal controls were set up outside the family. To verify all detected pathogenic mutations, NOTCH3 gene mutation detection rate was calculated according to the results of detection, and the mutation hotspot distribution of OTCH3 gene in China was analyzed combined with the literature.
Nine different missense point mutations (p.C43Y, p.R90C, p.R110C, p.R133C, p.R141C, p.C144S, p.R153C, p.C155W, p.R182C) were detected in 13 families, of which p.C43Y mutation and p.C155W mutation were first found in the world; the mutation rate of NOTCH3 gene in this group was 37.1% (13/35) and all the detected pathogenic mutations were found. In addition, an unidentified polymorphism (p.R1175W) was detected in exon 22 of one family, and a polymorphism c.C303T and c.A606G were detected in exons 3 and 4, respectively.
conclusion
1) p.C43Y mutation and p.C155W mutation are two new missense point mutations, which have not been reported at home and abroad.
2) Exon 4 and exon 3 of NOTCH3 gene are mutation hotspots of CADASIL patients in eastern China.
3) The detection rate of NOTCH3 gene mutation in suspected CADASIL patients was only 37.1%, suggesting the existence of other pathogenic genes.
4) the change of p.R1175W in exon 22 of NOTCH3 gene may be related to the pathogenesis of CADAS.
The second part is the clinical and imaging features of CADASIL.
objective
On the basis of gene detection, the clinical features and imaging features of NOTCH3 gene mutation group and non-mutation group were analyzed in order to find out the effective features for gene screening.
Method
The clinical and imaging characteristics of 25 patients with NOTCH3 gene mutation and 22 patients without NOTCH3 gene mutation were compared and analyzed. The clinical and imaging characteristics of the patients with NOTCH3 gene mutation and the relationship between cognitive function and imaging characteristics were analyzed. SPSS14.0 statistical software was used to analyze the data. The measurement data were expressed as (+) s, and the independent sample t test or Mann-Whitney U analysis were performed. The counting data were analyzed by Fisher exact test. The statistical significance level was determined as bilateral test, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05).
Result
1. Clinical characteristics: The age of onset (38.36+7.98 vs 49.05+8.41, P 0.001), the age of admission (45.52+9.61 vs 51.91+8.71, P = 0.022), the positive family history (78.6% vs 33.3%, P = 0.015), the incidence of hypertension (8.0% vs 40.9%, P = 0.014) and the use of antihypertensive drugs (8.0% vs 40.9%, P = 0.014) had statistical significance, while the other cerebrovascular diseases (78.6% vs 33.3%, P = 0.015) had statistical significance. There was no significant difference in risk factors and past hypotension and anticoagulant use.
2. Imaging: The high signal volume (HSV) of white matter in the mutant group was significantly higher than that in the non-mutant group (70.81 44.90 vs 42.24 6550 No significant difference was found between the two groups in the detection rate of intracerebral lacunar foci and the location of their distribution (subcortical, cortical and brainstem). However, in the number of intracerebral lacunar foci (5.33 [3.96] vs 2.00 [2.45, P = 0.007], the number of intracerebral microbleeding foci, the number of intracerebral microbleeding foci and the upper cranium of MRA in the mutant group was significantly higher than that in the non-mutant group. There was no significant difference between the two groups. The MMSE score was negatively correlated with white matter hyperintense signal volume and the number of intracerebral infarcts, but not with the degree of intracerebral microhemorrhage. 3. Further analysis of the patients with NOTCH3 gene mutation with MRA intracranial large artery stenosis showed that the patients with intracranial large artery disease had CAD ASIL. The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (62.5% vs 17.6%, P = 0.061) and hypertension (40.0% vs 0.0%, P = 0.065) were higher than that of CAD ASIL without intracranial arterial lesions, but there was no significant statistical difference because of the fewer cases. There was no statistical difference.
1. Severe leukoencephalopathy involving the temporal and basal ganglia extracapsular areas on imaging. Positive family history can be used as a useful indicator for clinical diagnosis of CADASIL. Less than 45 years of age is helpful for the diagnosis of CADASIL. Clinical manifestations (headache, stroke, mental disorders and cognitive impairment) and imaging findings include subcortical infarction, cortical infarction. Foci and intracerebral microbleeds can not be used to distinguish between NOTCH3 mutation patients and non mutation patients.
2, risk factors for cerebrovascular disease and intracranial artery stenosis can not be used as exclusion criteria for CADAS.
3. Cognitive function of CADASIL patients may be negatively correlated with high signal volume of white matter and the number of intracerebral lacunar lesions, but not with the severity of intracerebral microhemorrhage.
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:R743.3
【相似文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前10条
1 朱学骏,陈喜雪,李冠群,杨勇,马玲蕾,董慧婷,吴安,谢艳秋;角蛋白相关遗传性皮肤病基因突变的研究进展[J];中华皮肤科杂志;2001年05期
2 耿稚江;;构成长寿的基因突变被成功鉴定[J];国外医学情报;2004年09期
3 李胜光;黄烽;刘湘源;邓心新;徐明;丁玉珍;丛贤滋;;荧光杂交探针实时聚合酶链式反应快速检测甘露聚糖结合凝集素启动子区基因变异方法的建立[J];中华临床医师杂志(电子版);2008年06期
4 朱佳杰;;肺癌发生相关基因的研究进展[J];医药论坛杂志;2011年07期
5 高福平;魏谨;;P53与肺癌关系的研究进展[J];临床肺科杂志;2012年01期
6 路俊生;何胜虎;;家族性扩张型心肌病的基因突变[J];国际心血管病杂志;2012年03期
7 张广宇,孙以瑜,,王孟山,朱春贤;肺癌K-ras基因突变的检测及临床应用[J];中华结核和呼吸杂志;1995年05期
8 但凌;一种基因、四种综合征[J];国外医学.遗传学分册;1995年03期
9 张磊;吸烟致癌与P53基因[J];解放军健康;1998年03期
10 吴小军,李清泉,陈雪芹,胡克,丁续红,杨炯;肺癌患者组织和痰液中p53基因、K-ras基因突变[J];肿瘤防治研究;2000年01期
中国重要会议论文全文数据库 前10条
1 吴雪琼;张俊仙;李洪敏;梁建琴;钟敏;王巍;;结核分支杆菌耐药基因的研究[A];中国防痨协会全国学术会议大会学术报告[C];2001年
2 杨芳;金佩佩;王学锋;丁秋兰;王鸿利;李薇;王冠军;;2例新的基因突变导致遗传性蛋白S缺陷症[A];第11次中国实验血液学会议论文汇编[C];2007年
3 冯义国;白转丽;肖生祥;谭升顺;吴佳纹;;先天性厚甲症Ⅰ型的基因突变研究[A];中华医学会第14次全国皮肤性病学术年会论文汇编[C];2008年
4 刘第墉;;HOX基因热潮:又一次爆发性抄炒[A];中国古生物学会第21届学术年会论文摘要集[C];2001年
5 殷鑫浈;张宝荣;;脊髓小脑共济失调7型的临床特征及基因突变研究[A];第九次全国神经病学学术大会论文汇编[C];2006年
6 陆舜;李子明;;驱动基因和转化型研究的治疗策略[A];第13届全国肺癌学术大会论文汇编[C];2013年
7 吕鹤;呼群;袁云;;中国CADASIL的临床和基因改变规律[A];第九次全国神经病学学术大会论文汇编[C];2006年
8 沈杨;朱勇梅;樊星;施静艺;王琴荣;颜晓菁;顾朝晖;王彦艳;陈冰;姜春雷;严晗;陈菲菲;陈海敏;陈竺;金洁;陈赛娟;;1185例急性髓细胞白血病基因突变和预后影响研究[A];第13届全国实验血液学会议论文摘要[C];2011年
9 杨芳;周荣富;付启华;王学锋;丁秋兰;王鸿利;杨芳;李薇;王冠军;;5例新的基因突变导致遗传性抗凝血酶缺陷症[A];中华医学会第七次全国检验医学学术会议资料汇编[C];2008年
10 周向平;张成;粱秀龄;;Charcot-Marie-Tooth病Cx32基因突变研究[A];第四次全国中西医结合神经系统疾病学术研讨会论文集[C];2002年
中国重要报纸全文数据库 前10条
1 本报记者 李禾;吸烟导致的基因突变可代代相传?[N];科技日报;2010年
2 实习生 刘冰玉;检测癌症基因能否一纸完成?[N];科技日报;2012年
3 记者 耿建扩 通讯员 李晋陶 程益聪;人类8种新发基因突变被发现[N];光明日报;2013年
4 查莉 武佼芳;市中心医院发现人类8种新发基因突变[N];邯郸日报;2013年
5 吴汐;英科学家发现语言基因[N];辽宁日报;2001年
6 奇云;基因检测预知疾病几多风险[N];大众科技报;2007年
7 张田勘;基因的对垒与相互依存[N];大众科技报;2000年
8 马晓燕;查一下基因,能预知你容易得啥病[N];新华每日电讯;2005年
9 本报记者 夏雄伟;我们走在国内基因产业的最前列[N];证券时报;2000年
10 吉吉邋编译;科学家已发现吸烟基因[N];第一财经日报;2008年
中国博士学位论文全文数据库 前10条
1 茅江峰;不同基因突变对特发性低促性腺激素性性腺功能减退症患者的临床特点、隐睾和生精疗效的影响[D];北京协和医学院;2013年
2 杨昭庆;云南省两种遗传性血液疾病的基因突变研究[D];中国协和医科大学;2001年
3 张军航;肺癌组织中p16基因mRNA和蛋白表达及基因异常甲基化的研究[D];中国医科大学;2002年
4 李冰;第一部分 原发性骨髓纤维化患者基因突变的研究 第二部分 原发性骨髓纤维化患者的细胞遗传学研究 第三部分 血清铁蛋白是中国骨髓增生异常综合征中危-1组患者的独立预后因素[D];北京协和医学院;2014年
5 段妍;单纯型和显性营养不良型大疱性表皮松解症基因突变研究[D];南方医科大学;2014年
6 李红梅;联合检测p53基因和端粒酶对肺癌的诊断意义[D];天津医科大学;2010年
7 李剑;Ndr2基因在人类淋巴造血系统中的功能研究[D];第四军医大学;2002年
8 潘洪明;汉族人群RAGE基因和APE1基因多态性与肺癌易感性的关联研究[D];大连理工大学;2013年
9 陈栋;BRAF基因突变与恶性肿瘤的系统评价及其痕量检测方法的构建[D];第三军医大学;2014年
10 尹光浩;非小细胞肺癌的磷酸化EGFR与EGFR基因突变的比较分析[D];吉林大学;2009年
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前10条
1 李君;溃疡性结肠炎和溃疡性结肠炎相关癌的有关基因改变[D];浙江大学;2001年
2 孙文夏;脂代谢相关三基因突变小鼠模型的建立与动脉粥样硬化机理研究[D];浙江大学;2004年
3 焦卫云;一种新的凝血因子XIII基因突变导致的遗传性FXIII缺陷症[D];安徽医科大学;2007年
4 李长毅;nm23-H_1基因杂合性缺失与肺癌生物学特性[D];重庆医科大学;2004年
5 彭亚婷;RAD51基因G135C单核苷酸多态性在肺癌中的意义[D];南昌大学;2011年
6 谢艳秋;表皮松解性角化过度家系基因突变研究[D];天津医科大学;2002年
7 石文;中国南方汉族和西藏藏族RHCE基因多态性研究[D];广州中医药大学;2012年
8 吕卫刚;家族性腺瘤性息肉病基因诊断流程的建立及三个家系的突变分析[D];中南大学;2010年
9 刘晓蕾;肺癌EGFR基因突变检测方法的建立及临床应用[D];辽宁医学院;2012年
10 臧文巧;豫医无毛小鼠无毛基因突变部位的定位和分析[D];郑州大学;2004年
本文编号:2182795
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/shenjingyixue/2182795.html