一种新型鼻镜清洗篮筐使用效果分析

发布时间：2018-06-20 20:18

本文选题：消毒供应中心 + 鼻镜　；参考：《中国感染控制杂志》2017年07期

【摘要】：目的了解新型鼻镜清洗篮筐固定鼻镜进行清洗处理的清洗效果。方法将待处理的鼻镜分为A、B两组(各12件,重复试验3次),A组采用手工刷洗预处理再放入清洗机内清洗,B组采用新型鼻镜清洗篮筐固定清洗后再放入清洗机内清洗,清洗后采用肉眼目测,10倍带光源放大镜观察和ATP生物荧光检测仪检测鼻镜的清洗合格率。结果A、B分拣处理时间分别为(2.16±0.52)、(0.20±0.06)min,B组分拣时间短于A组,差异有统计学意义(t=66.578,P0.05)。采用肉眼目测、10倍放大镜观察及ATP生物荧光检测的方式观察鼻镜前端的清洗合格率,A组分别为33.33%~58.33%、25.00%~33.33%、16.67%~25.00%,B组分别为100.00%、91.67%~100.00%、83.33%~100.00%,B组清洗合格率均高于A组(均P0.05)。结论在实际操作中采用新型鼻镜清洗篮筐,有助于鼻镜的关键部位得到彻底清洗,且处理时间更短,可以提高工作效率。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the cleaning effect of a new type of rhinoscope. Methods the nasal endoscopes were divided into two groups: group A (12 pieces each, repeated test 3 times) and group A (group A) were washed by hand and then washed in the cleaning machine. Group B used a new type of nasal mirror to clean the basket and then put it into the cleaning machine. After cleaning, 10 times light source magnifying glass observation and ATP bioluminescence detector were used to detect the qualified rate of nasal lens cleaning. Results the sorting time of group B was less than that of group A (2.16 卤0.52) and group B (0.20 卤0.06 min), respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The eligible rate of cleaning in group A was 33.335.33% and 25.00% in group A, respectively. The cleaning rate of group B was 100.0091.67mg 100.0083.33100.000.000 (all P 0.05) higher than that of group A (P < 0.05), and that of group B was significantly higher than that of group B (P < 0.05), and that of group B was significantly higher than that of group B (P < 0.05), and that of group B was significantly higher than that of group B (P < 0.05), respectively, and that of group B was higher than that of group A (P < 0.05). The cleaning rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A. Conclusion it is helpful to clean the key parts of nasal endoscope thoroughly, and the treatment time is shorter, which can improve the working efficiency.
【作者单位】：甘肃省人民医院;
【分类号】：R197.39

【参考文献】