鼻内镜下吸切割器切除术与腺样体刮除术治疗小儿腺样体肥大的临床效果比较
本文选题:鼻内镜下吸切割器切除术 切入点:腺样体刮除术 出处:《中国实用医药》2016年36期
【摘要】:目的比较分析鼻内镜下吸切割器切除术与腺样体刮除术治疗小儿腺样体肥大的临床效果。方法 66例小儿腺样体肥大患儿,采用数字随机法分成观察组和对照组,各33例。观察组采取鼻内镜下吸切割器切除术治疗,对照组采取腺样体刮除术治疗,比较两组临床效果。结果观察组痊愈28例(84.85%),显效4例(12.12%),无效1例(3.03%),总有效率96.97%,对照组痊愈16例(48.48%),显效11例(33.33%),无效6例(18.18%),总有效率81.82%,观察组患儿总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组术后出血1例(3.03%),腺样体残留0例,并发症发生率3.03%,对照组术后出血7例(21.21%),腺样体残留5例(15.15%),并发症发生率36.36%,观察组患儿并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论鼻内镜下吸切割器切除术治疗小儿腺样体肥大疗效和术后并发症均优于传统腺样体刮除术,是优秀的治疗方式之一。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare and analyze the clinical effect of endoscopic endoscopic curettage and adenoid curettage in the treatment of adenoid hypertrophy in children. Methods 66 children with adenoid hypertrophy were randomly divided into observation group and control group. 33 cases each. The observation group was treated with endoscopic suction cutter, while the control group was treated with adenoid curettage. Results the clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results in the observation group, 28 cases were cured (84.85), 4 cases were significantly effective (12.12), 1 case was ineffective (3.03g), and the total effective rate was 96.97%. In the control group, 16 cases were cured (48.48%), 11 cases (33.3333%) were effective, 6 cases were ineffective (18.18%), and the total effective rate was 81.82. The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the total effective rate was higher in the observation group than in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). In the observation group, there were 1 case of postoperative hemorrhage, 1 case of postoperative hemorrhage, 0 cases of adenoid residue, the incidence of complications was 3.03, 7 cases of postoperative hemorrhage in the control group were 21.21%, 5 cases of adenoid residue were 15. 15%, the incidence of complications was 36.36%, the incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group. Conclusion Endoscopic resection of adenoid hypertrophy and postoperative complications are superior to those of traditional adenoidectomy, which is one of the best methods for the treatment of adenoid hypertrophy in children.
【作者单位】: 江苏省靖江市人民医院耳鼻喉科;
【分类号】:R766.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨羿容;朱德姝;徐小鸿;鄢斌成;;鼻口联合动力系统腺样体吸割术与常规腺样体刮除术的对比[J];泸州医学院学报;2011年06期
2 高法平;;儿童扁摘术及腺样体刮除术后出血[J];沂水医专学报;1984年02期
3 阮士政,马云芳,高波,王会平;腺样体刮除术后大出血窒息困难插管1例[J];咸宁学院学报(医学版);2004年04期
4 王海妹;周学军;;鼻内镜下腺样体刮除术60例临床观察[J];海南医学;2006年05期
5 魏庭文;;儿童腺样体刮除术后复发原因及对策[J];中原医刊;2006年16期
6 李大建;刘新义;张恩东;刘艳;孙彩波;;内镜下对传统腺样体刮除术的临床评估[J];山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报;2008年01期
7 凌科技;肖旭平;冯晓辉;;鼻内镜下腺样体吸切术与常规腺样体刮除术疗效分析[J];临床小儿外科杂志;2008年02期
8 郭庆生;赵芹芳;李恩宇;;内窥镜下腺样体刮除术技巧探讨[J];中国现代医生;2008年19期
9 司峰志;郑艳;;传统腺样体刮除术内镜下86例临床评估[J];地方病通报;2009年05期
10 李红英;安英杰;孙克峰;;腺样体鼻内镜下切除术与传统腺样体刮除术比较[J];河北医药;2010年13期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 张国明;赵晖;刘建平;戴春富;;直视下腺样体刮除术和腺样体切吸术[A];2006年浙江省耳鼻咽喉科学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
2 陈敏芬;;经内窥镜腺样体切除术与腺样体刮除术的疗效比较[A];华东六省一市耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科学术会议暨2008年浙江省耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科学术年会论文汇编[C];2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 杨佳;腺样体刮除术对相关疾病转归的影响[D];新疆医科大学;2008年
,本文编号:1657917
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/wuguanyixuelunwen/1657917.html