不同方案治疗良性阵发性位置性眩晕的疗效分析

发布时间：2018-04-12 01:02

  本文选题：良性阵发性位置性眩晕 + 耳石复位　； 参考：《中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志》2016年06期

【摘要】：目的比较分析不同治疗方案治疗良性阵发性位置性眩晕的疗效。方法回顾性分析189例BPPV患者,根据治疗方案分成4组。组1(56例)为手法复位加甲磺酸倍他司汀口服,组2(55例)为手法复位加银杏叶提取物静脉滴注,组3(40例)为SRM-IV前庭功能治疗系统复位加甲磺酸倍他司汀口服,组4(38例)为SRM-IV前庭功能治疗系统复位加银杏叶提取物静脉滴注。比较分析各组的治愈时间及治疗效果。结果治愈时间组间差异有显著性统计学意义(P0.05),组2治疗时间最短(6.58±2.05天);治疗效果组间差异有统计学意义(P0.05),组2痊愈率最高,组2及组4有效率优于其他2组。结论结果分析显示,手法复位或机械复位基础上辅以药物治疗BPPV,都可以获得较好疗效。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare and analyze the therapeutic effects of different treatment schemes on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.Methods 189 patients with BPPV were retrospectively analyzed and divided into 4 groups according to the treatment plan.Group 1 (n = 56) were treated with manual reduction plus betastatin mesylate, group 2 (n = 55) with intravenous infusion of ginkgo biloba extract (n = 55) and group B (n = 340) with SRM-IV vestibular function therapy system and betastatin mesylate orally.Group A (n = 38) was treated with SRM-IV vestibular function therapy system reduction and intravenous infusion of Ginkgo biloba extract.The cure time and therapeutic effect of each group were compared and analyzed.Results there was significant difference in the cure time between the two groups (P 0.05), and the shortest treatment time in group 2 was 6.58 卤2.05 days, and the difference in therapeutic effect was significant (P 0.05). The recovery rate of group 2 was the highest, and the effective rate of group 2 and group 4 was better than that of other two groups.Conclusion the results showed that both manual reduction and mechanical reduction combined with drug therapy for BPPVs were effective.
【作者单位】： 北京王府中西医结合医院耳鼻咽喉科;河北医科大学第二医院耳鼻咽喉科;北京首大耳鼻咽喉医院;
【基金】：河北省卫计委医学科学基金资助项目 缺血及缺血再灌注对内耳疾病影响的基础和临床研究,(立项编号:ZL20140118)
【分类号】：R764.3
，

本文编号：1738441