年龄、教育、佩戴时间对助听器效果评估影响的分析

发布时间：2018-06-02 06:24

本文选题：助听器 + 效果评估　；参考：《天津医科大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：目的：本研究针对同一时间段内选配助听器的群体,利用助听器每日生活使用满意度调查问卷(the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life,SADL)、助听器效果国际性调查问卷(the international outcome inventory for hearing aids.IOI-HA)对患者进行助听器佩戴效果及满意度的评估,分析年龄因素时间因素以及教育程度在助听器佩戴效果中的影响。方法：选取2010年9月到11月接受天津市残联发放的丹麦瑞声达心扉系列助听器的90人作为研究对象,其中男性50人,女性40人,年龄从19岁到80岁,教育程度从小学到大学,均为双侧中重度感音神经性聋患者。将研究对象分为ABC3组,19～40岁作为A组,人数为30,41～60岁作为B组,人数为31,61到80岁作为C组,人数为29。使用日常生活满意度调查问卷(SADL)助听器效果国际性调查问卷(IOI-HA),采用面对面问答或者电话随访方式,分别于6周,6月,12月后进行助听器效果及满意度评估。再将研究对象按受教育程度分为DEF3组,其中D组20人,教育程度为小学到初中,E组42人,教育程度从中专到高中,F组28人,教育程度为大专到大学。依然使用以上问卷,以同样方法进行评估。结果：SADL问卷评分,积极作用、服务与花费以及个人形象A组得分均高于B.C两组,B组得分均高于C组(p0.01)；F组得分均高于D.E两组,E组得分均高于D组(p0.01)；负面作用A组得分均低于B.C两组,B组得分均低于C组(p0.01)；D组得分均高于E.F两组,E组得分均高于F组(p0.01)。IOI-HA问卷评分,A组得分均高于B.C两组,B组得分均高于C组(p0.01)；F组得分均高于D.E两组,E组得分均高于D组(p0.01)。结论： 1.随着年龄的增长,患者对助听器佩戴的受益度及满意度是逐渐降低的； 2.随着受教育程度的增加,患者对助听器佩戴的受益度及满意度是逐渐增加的； 3.随着佩戴时间的增长,无论受教育程度及年龄因素是否改变,患者对助听器的佩戴的受益度及满意度都是逐渐增加的。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the population of hearing aids in the same time period. The Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily lifestyle satisfaction questionnaire was used to evaluate the effect of hearing aid wear and satisfaction with the international outcome inventory for hearing aids.IOI-HAA. To analyze the influence of age factor and education level on the effect of hearing aid wear. Methods: from September to November 2010, 90 people who received a series of hearing aids from Tianjin disabled people's Federation were selected, including 50 males and 40 females, aged from 19 to 80, and their educational level ranged from primary school to university. All patients were bilateral moderate and severe sensorineural deafness. The subjects were divided into ABC3 group (n = 40), group A (n = 40), group B (n = 30), and group C (n = 31), aged from 31 to 80 years (n = 29). An international questionnaire on hearing aid effects was used to evaluate the effect of hearing aid and satisfaction after 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months, respectively, by means of face-to-face question and answer or telephone follow-up. The subjects were divided into two groups according to their educational level: group D (n = 20), group E (n = 42), group F (n = 28) with educational level from secondary school to high school, and their education level was from college to university. The questionnaire is still used and evaluated in the same way. The results showed that the score of SADL questionnaire was positive. The scores of service and expense and personal image in group A were higher than those in group B and group B were higher than those in group C and group C, respectively. The scores of group E were higher than those of group D and group E were higher than that of group D, and the scores of group A were lower than those of group B and group B. The scores in group C were higher than those in group E and group E were higher than those in group F and group B respectively. The scores of group A were higher than that of group B and group B were higher than those of group C and group C, respectively. The scores of group D were higher than those of group D and group E were higher than those of group D (p0.01). Conclusion: 1. With the increase of age, the degree of benefit and satisfaction of patients with hearing aid wear decreased gradually. 2. With the increase of education, the degree of benefit and satisfaction of patients with hearing aid wear increased gradually. 3. With the increase of wearing time, the degree of benefit and satisfaction of hearing aid wear increased gradually, regardless of whether the education level and age factors changed.
【学位授予单位】：天津医科大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：R764

【参考文献】