Epley管石复位法与Semont管石解脱法治疗后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕的临床疗效比较

发布时间：2018-06-20 17:53

本文选题：眩晕 + Epley管石复位法　；参考：《实用心脑肺血管病杂志》2016年S1期

【摘要】：目的比较Epley管石复位法与Semont管石解脱法治疗后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕的临床疗效。方法选取2015年8月—2016年10月聊城市第三人民医院收治的76例后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为Epley组与Semont组,每组各38例。Epley组患者接受Epley管石复位法,Semont组患者接受Semont管石解脱法,对比两组患者临床疗效及康复时间。结果 Epley组总有效率为92.1%(35/38),Semont组总有效率为94.7%(36/38),两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.214,P=0.644)。Epley组患者康复时间为(7.5±2.1)d,Semont组为(7.7±2.2)d,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.405,P=0.686)。结论 Epley管石复位法与Semont管石解脱法治疗后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕的临床疗效均较好,康复时间相当,临床可根据实际情况予以选择。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the clinical effect of Epley reduction and Semont decompression in the treatment of posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Methods 76 patients with posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo treated in Liaocheng third people's Hospital from August 2015 to October 2016 were randomly divided into Epley group and Semont group. Each group of 38 patients with Epley group received Epley stone reduction and Semont group patients received Semont tracheolithiasis release method, the two groups of patients compared the clinical efficacy and recovery time. Results the total effective rate of Epley group was 92.1% 35 / 38 + Semont group (94.775 / 36 / 38). There was no significant difference between the two groups (蠂 ~ (2 +) 0.214P ~ (0.644) .Epley group (n = 7.5 卤2.1 d) and Semont group (7.7 卤2.2 d). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.405) (P = 0.686). Conclusion the treatment of posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo with Epley's reduction method and Semont's decompression method is effective and the recovery time is equal. It can be selected according to the actual situation.
【作者单位】：山东省聊城市第三人民医院神经内科;
【分类号】：R764

【参考文献】