常见基因相关耳聋的临床特点及人工耳蜗植入效果分析
[Abstract]:Normal hearing is the basis of language formation and development, hearing speech disorder directly affects daily life communication and learning. Deafness is one of the most distressed diseases of human being. In 2006, the second national sampling survey on disabled persons in China showed that the total number of disabled persons of all types was 82 million 960 thousand, and the hearing disability was 27 million 800 thousand, the first of all kinds of disabilities. The causes of deafness include heredity, drugs, noise, trauma, and combination of many factors. Among them, the proportion of the gene mutation as the main deafness cause of the hearing impaired children is up to 50%-60%. in China, and the proportion of the deafness associated with GJB2 and SLC26A4 mutation is about 35.5% in the hereditary deafness. It is the two major responsible gene for the highest detection rate. The clinical and the clinical and imaging features of the deafness people with GJB2 and SLC26A4 mutations are studied from the age, the degree of hearing loss, and the CT expression, so that the diagnosis and guidance of clinical intervention can be made to help clearly diagnose and guide the clinical intervention. Significance. The emergence of Cochlear implantation (CI) technology provides a chance for bilateral extremely severe sensorineural deafness to provide a chance to return to the world of sound..CI implantation is becoming more and more perfect. The number of cases of cochlear implantation is increasing year by year, and the ability of CI people to be aware of hearing, speech recognition, and language output constantly. However, there are still large individual differences in the effect of postoperative rehabilitation. With the extensive use of gene detection and diagnostic techniques, a large number of deafness children with genetic mutations have occupied a large part of the CI population. Different gene mutations have been used as the cause of the cause of sensorineural hearing loss on the effect of auditory speech rehabilitation after CI. There are some contradictions in the previous study. There are few research data on auditory speech rehabilitation effect after CI operation in different regional and non English language families with hearing loss gene related sensorineural hearing loss. 1. the purpose of this study was to compare the age of onset of GJB2, SLC26A4 gene mutation related sensorineural hearing loss in children, the degree of hearing loss and the.2. study of inner ear imaging. To explore the rehabilitation characteristics of auditory speech after cochlear implantation in children with GJB2, SLC26A4 gene mutation related to sensorineural deafness. The first part is to compare the clinical characteristics of the common gene related deafness and to compare the age of onset, the degree of hearing loss and the inner ear imaging characteristics of GJB2, SLC26A4 mutation related sensorineural hearing loss. Methods 218 children with GJB2, SLC26A4 homozygous or complex heterozygous mutations were detected in 218 children with 0~12 year old sensorineural deafness, including 123 cases of GJB2 homozygous or complex heterozygous mutations, and SLC26A4 homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in the 218 cases of GJB2, homozygous or complex heterozygous mutation in our hospital. 95 cases were divided into infant group (0~1 years old), early childhood group (1.1~3 years), pre school age group (3.1~6 years old) and school age group (6.1~12 years old). The age constitution of children with GJB2, SLC26A4 gene homozygous or complex heterozygous mutations, hearing loss and temporal bone CT imaging characteristics were investigated. The results of the 1, GJB2, SLC26A4 two gene mutation group were found. The proportion of age in infancy, infancy, pre school age and school age were 43.09%, 37.40%, 14.63%, 4.88% and 24.2%, 44.21%, 18.95%, 12.63%, and two groups were statistically significant (P=0.014).2, GJB2, and SLC26A4 gene mutation group was moderate, severe and extremely severe: 8.94%, 17.89, respectively. %, 73.17% and 9.47%, 34.74%, 55.79%, group GJB2 was the most severe hearing loss, and the ratio of hearing loss in the SLC26A4 group was statistically significant (P=0.014).3. The ratio of hearing loss in children with GJB2 gene mutation was statistically significant (P=0.000), and then the 22 groups were compared and the degree of hearing loss in the early childhood group The proportion of extreme severe hearing loss was higher, the proportion of extreme severe hearing loss in preschool and school age groups decreased with severe severe hearing loss. The degree of hearing loss in all age groups of.SLC26A4 gene mutation was severe, most severe, and the ratio of hearing loss was not statistically significant (P=0.686).4, GJB2 gene mutation. In group 99.19% (122/123), the inner ear structure of children was normal, only one case with CT showed bilateral internal auditory stenosis, and the SLC26A4 gene mutation group 95.79% (91/95) had CT in the temporal bone with enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct. 1, the age of children with deafness with GJB2 gene mutation was concentrated in infant, early childhood (0~3 years), most severe sensorineural deafness and no inner ear. The age of.2, SLC26A4 gene mutation and sensorineural hearing loss in children is mostly in early childhood (1.1~3 years), mainly with severe, extremely severe sensorineural deafness, closely related to the internal ear malformation with enlarged vestibule pipes. The second part of the common gene related deafness cochlear implantation is to study the GJB2, SLC26A4 gene The characteristics of auditory speech rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in children with mutational related sensorineural deafness were observed. Methods a total of 198 children, 102 males and 96 females, aged 3.14 years old in October -2016 years in February January 2015, were observed and assessed. The results were divided into group GJB2, SLC26A4 group and unfound basis according to the results of gene detection. The auditory speech ability of the three groups was evaluated and compared before the operation, in March, in June, and in December, respectively. The evaluation contents included sound field hearing hearing threshold test, Categories ofauditory performance, CAP, Speech Intelligibility Rate, SIR score, and speech recognition ability test. The hearing of the hearing impaired children, the standard of language ability evaluation was more than. Results 1, the auditory speech ability of group GJB2, SLC26A4 group and control group increased gradually with the prolongation of recovery time. The difference of CAP, SIR score, speech recognition rate and language age at adjacent time points were statistically significant (P0.05).2, GJB2 group time point CAP, SIR score and speech in each group. There was no significant difference in speech recognition rate and language age compared with the results of the same follow-up time in the control group (P0.05).3. Before operation, March, and CAP after operation in group SLC26A4, SIR score and speech recognition rate were significantly higher than that of group GJB2 and control group, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The CAP, SIR score, speech recognition rate and GJB2 group in December after operation. There was no significant difference in the difference between the control group and the control group (P0.05) the language age of the group.SLC26A4 was not statistically significant (P0.05) at all time points and the other two groups. The conclusion was 1. The short-term rehabilitation effect of the cochlear implant in children with SLC26A4 gene mutation was better than that of the GJB2 gene mutation and the undetected gene mutation,.2, and the GJB2 gene mutation in SNHL patients. Conclusion 1. children with deafness with GJB2 gene mutation are concentrated in infants, early childhood (0~3 years), most severe sensorineural deafness, and children with more non.2.SLC26A4 gene mutations and sensorineural hearing loss are more common in children. In early childhood (1.1~3 years of age), severe, extremely severe sensorineural deafness is the main factor, and the.3.SLC26A4 gene mutation is closely related to the enlarged inner ear malformation associated with the vestibule tube. The short-term rehabilitation effect of the cochlear implantation in children with sensorineural deafness is obviously better than that of the GJB2 gene mutation and the.4.GJB2 mutation in the undetected gene mutants. Children with deafness can achieve better hearing and speech rehabilitation after operation, and are equal to those without gene mutation.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R764.43
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 龙墨,龙江;家长在聋儿接受人工耳蜗植入过程中的作用[J];听力学及言语疾病杂志;2003年03期
2 于萍,Agramunt A Guarella MD;成人语后聋患者人工耳蜗植入前后言语韵律的分析[J];中国听力语言康复科学杂志;2003年01期
3 曹克利;人工耳蜗植入的相关工作需要规范化[J];中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志;2004年02期
4 龙海珊;儿童人工耳蜗植入效果与手术年龄的关系[J];国外医学.耳鼻咽喉科学分册;2004年04期
5 马晓波;神经遥测反应在人工耳蜗植入患者中的应用[J];国外医学.耳鼻咽喉科学分册;2004年04期
6 冯德珍,肖利,黄茂华;对人工耳蜗植入患儿的家长实施健康教育的体会[J];局解手术学杂志;2004年06期
7 王洪田,郗昕,韩东一,黄德亮,武文明,杨仕明;人工耳蜗植入对耳鸣的影响[J];中华耳科学杂志;2005年02期
8 张才云,肖自安;关于人工耳蜗植入的哲学思考[J];医学与社会;2005年09期
9 周果宏,刘莎,吴璇,马凌;人工耳蜗植入患者检测信息管理数据库的应用系统[J];中国临床康复;2005年01期
10 唐志辉;;香港中文大学人工耳蜗植入工作和人类传意科学研究所[J];中国医学文摘(耳鼻咽喉科学);2006年04期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 仲秀荣;许安廷;;人工耳蜗植入前患者的评估[A];全国护理行政管理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2004年
2 李蕴;任燕;吴皓;;人工耳蜗植入与耳鸣关系的分析[A];全国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科中青年学术会议论文汇编[C];2012年
3 杨仕明;;人工耳蜗植入技术的挑战[A];全国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科中青年学术会议论文汇编[C];2012年
4 胡宝华;汪际云;姚敏敏;徐超;;四种品牌人工耳蜗植入的临床体会[A];2012年浙江省耳鼻咽喉科学学术年会论文集[C];2012年
5 肖玉丽;;人工耳蜗植入患者耳鸣状况分析[A];中国中西医结合学会耳鼻咽喉科专业委员会第十三次学术会议、浙江省中西医结合学会耳鼻咽喉科专业委员会第十一次学术会议论文汇编[C];2013年
6 杜婉;郭玉芬;徐百成;刘晓雯;朱一鸣;王艳莉;王秋菊;王大勇;;甘肃省人工耳蜗植入患儿耳聋常见基因检测的研究[A];中华医学会第十三次全国耳鼻咽喉——头颈外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2013年
7 胡宝华;王海英;;三种不同国家产人工耳蜗植入的手术体会[A];2006年浙江省耳鼻咽喉科学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
8 韩德民;李永新;郑军;刘博;陈雪清;马泓智;梁爽;莫玲燕;刘莎;孔颖;张华;;双侧同期人工耳蜗植入效果分析[A];中华医学会第十次全国耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科学术会议论文汇编(上)[C];2007年
9 杨仕明;李佳楠;戴朴;韩维举;刘军;赵辉;邹艺辉;候昭晖;焦青山;孙丽;陈爱婷;洪梦迪;王倩;郗昕;黄德亮;杨伟炎;韩东一;;人工耳蜗植入1600例患者总体情况分析[A];中华医学会第十三次全国耳鼻咽喉——头颈外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2013年
10 刘军;;千例人工耳蜗植入患者的耳聋遗传学病因分析[A];中华医学会第十三次全国耳鼻咽喉——头颈外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2013年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 北京大学第三医院耳鼻喉科 马芙蓉 潘滔;人工耳蜗植入不再设限[N];健康报;2012年
2 郑杨;人工耳蜗植入治疗逾百例[N];科技日报;2003年
3 陈英云 栗嘉;我国人工耳蜗植入基地落户哈医大[N];科技日报;2004年
4 记者 宜秀萍;人工耳蜗植入定点手术医院在兰挂牌[N];甘肃日报;2012年
5 中国聋儿康复研究中心主任医师 龙墨;人工耳蜗植入 宜早不宜迟[N];健康报;2010年
6 本报记者 马艳红;推动语后聋患者人工耳蜗植入的开展[N];中国医药报;2011年
7 保健时报记者 邱爽;人工耳蜗植入最好学龄前[N];保健时报;2010年
8 章润涵;上海开展人工耳蜗植入慈善捐助[N];科技日报;2006年
9 龙莹 祝立平 麻芙蓉;胡向阳考察我州“启聪扶贫计划”工作[N];团结报;2010年
10 本报记者 孙敏坚;爱,要让你听见[N];湖南日报;2012年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 刘建菊;人工耳蜗植入儿童听觉康复效果评估标准的修订及应用研究[D];华东师范大学;2012年
2 王亮;人工耳蜗植入中的相关电生理研究[D];郑州大学;2004年
3 朱美美;人工耳蜗植入后的效果评估及标准汉语普通话评估材料的开发验证[D];复旦大学;2012年
4 蔡超婵;人工耳蜗植入后的疗效观察及大前庭水管综合征患者基因型和听力表型的相关性研究[D];中国人民解放军医学院;2014年
5 陈东野;人工耳蜗植入群体中耳聋相关基因的检测与分析[D];中国协和医科大学;2008年
6 刘军;人工耳蜗植入患者耳聋分子发病机制及疗效研究[D];中国人民解放军军医进修学院;2007年
7 张志利;电诱发听性脑干反应在人工耳蜗植入的研究及临床应用[D];中国协和医科大学;2009年
8 金毅;人工耳蜗植入前EABR检测参数的优化及临床应用[D];北京协和医学院;2013年
9 杨扬;Gesell发育量表对儿童人工耳蜗植入术后效果的预测价值[D];首都医科大学;2017年
10 王斌;人工耳蜗植入前ECAP、EABR和EMLR检测方法的建立及临床应用[D];北京协和医学院;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 周裔翠;人工耳蜗植入群体耳聋基因筛查及术后效果分析[D];山东大学;2015年
2 孙懿;人工耳蜗植入术后听力、言语及生活质量的评估[D];安徽医科大学;2016年
3 陈丽丽;语前聋患儿国产人工耳蜗植入效果分析[D];郑州大学;2016年
4 张国英;人工耳蜗植入患儿父母心理弹性与心理状况的关系及干预研究[D];郑州大学;2016年
5 李玲;语前聋患儿一侧人工耳蜗植入对侧佩戴助听器聆听效果分析[D];郑州大学;2016年
6 汪芳;人工耳蜗植入术后听力言语康复效果分析[D];皖南医学院;2016年
7 向琳;儿童人工耳蜗植入后康复效果及影响因素研究[D];吉林大学;2017年
8 秦飞飞;耳蜗植入体周围皮瓣的相关并发症研究[D];安徽医科大学;2017年
9 张莉;青少年语前聋患者人工耳蜗植入术后听力及生活质量评估[D];安徽医科大学;2017年
10 耿博;97例人工耳蜗植入效果分析[D];山东大学;2017年
,本文编号:2134781
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/wuguanyixuelunwen/2134781.html