自由个体主义还是儒家家庭主义：从医学问题看生命伦理学与中国传统文化的碰撞
发布时间：2021-05-06 09:12
本文从介绍生命伦理学这一概念着手，从跨文化研究的角度阐述了生命伦理学范畴下的医学问题所体现的中国与西方不同的价值观，意在解释中西方不同社会成员对安乐死、器官捐赠、医疗讲真话以及知情同意等生命伦理学问题做出相反的决策或反应的深刻原因。本文从全新的综合性视角出发，从学术角度将生命伦理学与跨文化研究联系起来，以跨文化交际学中的个体主义与集体主义这一文化维度理论为基础，延伸出西方自主性与中国儒家家庭主义的对比性，并通过对比研究法、文献综述法以及案头研究，对中西方不同社会成员在对待生命伦理学问题时，由于这两种相反的文化价值观的影响所体现出的不同态度进行全面、系统的文化对比研究。该研究的目的在于为解决本文体现出的文化分歧提供富有建设性的建议，指明只要在“场域”中解决矛盾与分歧，并且当事人都能用文化包容的态度对待其他文化，那么两种看似对立的文化是可以通约的。
【文章来源】：西安外国语大学陕西省
【文章页数】：71 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
摘要
CHAPTER Ⅰ INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Purpose of the Study
1.3 Methodology and Thesis Structure
CHAPTER Ⅱ LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Related Study Abroad
2.2 Related Study at Home
2.3 Research Questions
CHAPTER Ⅲ THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
3.1 Individualism vs. Collectivism in Cross-culture Studies
3.1.1 Individualism
3.1.2 Collectivism
3.2 Autonomy vs. Confucian Familism
3.2.1 Western Culture-Bound Autonomy
3.2.2 Chinese Confucian Familism
CHAPTER Ⅳ BIOETHICS AND ITS DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA
4.1 Conceptualization of Bioethics
4.1.1 Definition and Research Scope of Bioethics
4.1.2 Principles of Bioethics
4.1.2.1 Autonomy
4.1.2.2 Beneficence
4.1.2.3 Nonmaleficence
4.1.2.4 Justice
4.2 The Development of Bioethics in China
4.2.1 Three Waves of Chinese Bioethical Development
4.2.2 The Problem of Chinese Bioethical Development
CHAPTER Ⅴ EMBODIMENT OF AUTONOMY VS. CONFUCIAN FAMILISM IN BIOETHICS
5.1 Different Perceptions Between the West and China on Life and Death
5.1.1 Western Traditional Ethics on Life and Death
5.1.2 Chinese Traditional Perception of Life and Death
5.1.3 Embodiment of Attitudinal Disparity Toward Death on Euthanasia
5.1.3.1 Perception of Euthanasia
5.1.3.2 Positive Attitude Toward Euthanasia in the West
5.1.3.3 Impact of Chinese Familism and Filial Piety on Euthanasia
5.1.4 Embodiment of Attitudinal Disparity Toward Death on Organ Donation
5.1.4.1 Western Ideology on Organ Donation
5.1.4.2 Ethical Predicament of Organ Donation in Chinese Cultural Background
5.2 Western Self-determination vs. Chinese Family-centered Decision-making
5.2.1 Different Decision-making Models Exemplified in Truth-telling
5.2.1.1 Patient Knows First in the West
5.2.1.2 Family Know First in China
5.2.2 Different Decision-making Models Exemplified in Informed Consent
5.2.2.1 Informed Consent—A Borrowed Concept
5.2.2.2 Western Autonomy as the Kernel of Informed Consent
5.2.2.3 Chinese Family-consent Model of Informed Consent
CHAPTER Ⅵ WAY TO DEAL WITH CULTURAL DISSENSUS
6.1 Communicating and Making Decisions in the “Field”
6.2 Promotion of Cultural Tolerance
6.3 Commensurability of Western autonomy and Confucian Familism
CHAPTER Ⅶ CONCLUSION
7.1 Implications for Future Studies
7.2 Limitations of the Study
WORKS CITED
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]当代生命伦理学困惑疏解的儒学观照[J]. 任嫦勤,李明. 岭南学刊. 2011(05)
[2]儒家伦理对当代生命伦理学发展的价值及其局限[J]. 程新宇. 伦理学研究. 2009(03)
[3]儒家生命伦理学何以可能?[J]. 张舜清. 道德与文明. 2008(04)
[4]病人自主性与家庭本位主义之间的张力[J]. 雷锦程. 医学与哲学(人文社会医学版). 2008(03)
[5]试论生命伦理学的自主性原则[J]. 黄发林. 重庆工学院学报. 2006(03)
[6]论知情同意的中国本土化——中国文化视野中的知情同意走向[J]. 张英涛,孙福川. 医学与哲学. 2004(09)
[7]人本主义与生命伦理学[J]. 屈志勤,苏海琼. 医学与哲学. 2000(12)
[8]面对科技,生命何以自处──论北美生命伦理学[J]. 许志伟. 复旦学报(社会科学版). 1999(02)
硕士论文
[1]现代死亡观与传统道德的冲突与化解[D]. 王明丽.第四军医大学 2011
[2]生命伦理学在我国本土化发展的研究[D]. 高薇.第四军医大学 2010
[3]我国人体器官异体移植的伦理问题研究[D]. 周祯宇.重庆师范大学 2010
[4]伦理学视阈中的安乐死问题研究[D]. 胡以贵.曲阜师范大学 2007
[5]安乐死的伦理学辩护[D]. 王进.湖南师范大学 2006
[6]文化学视野下的安乐死问题研究[D]. 张磊.南京理工大学 2005
[7]中美生命伦理学的比较研究[D]. 土丽艳.第四军医大学 2002
本文编号：3171656
【文章来源】：西安外国语大学陕西省
【文章页数】：71 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
摘要
CHAPTER Ⅰ INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Purpose of the Study
1.3 Methodology and Thesis Structure
CHAPTER Ⅱ LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Related Study Abroad
2.2 Related Study at Home
2.3 Research Questions
CHAPTER Ⅲ THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
3.1 Individualism vs. Collectivism in Cross-culture Studies
3.1.1 Individualism
3.1.2 Collectivism
3.2 Autonomy vs. Confucian Familism
3.2.1 Western Culture-Bound Autonomy
3.2.2 Chinese Confucian Familism
CHAPTER Ⅳ BIOETHICS AND ITS DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA
4.1 Conceptualization of Bioethics
4.1.1 Definition and Research Scope of Bioethics
4.1.2 Principles of Bioethics
4.1.2.1 Autonomy
4.1.2.2 Beneficence
4.1.2.3 Nonmaleficence
4.1.2.4 Justice
4.2 The Development of Bioethics in China
4.2.1 Three Waves of Chinese Bioethical Development
4.2.2 The Problem of Chinese Bioethical Development
CHAPTER Ⅴ EMBODIMENT OF AUTONOMY VS. CONFUCIAN FAMILISM IN BIOETHICS
5.1 Different Perceptions Between the West and China on Life and Death
5.1.1 Western Traditional Ethics on Life and Death
5.1.2 Chinese Traditional Perception of Life and Death
5.1.3 Embodiment of Attitudinal Disparity Toward Death on Euthanasia
5.1.3.1 Perception of Euthanasia
5.1.3.2 Positive Attitude Toward Euthanasia in the West
5.1.3.3 Impact of Chinese Familism and Filial Piety on Euthanasia
5.1.4 Embodiment of Attitudinal Disparity Toward Death on Organ Donation
5.1.4.1 Western Ideology on Organ Donation
5.1.4.2 Ethical Predicament of Organ Donation in Chinese Cultural Background
5.2 Western Self-determination vs. Chinese Family-centered Decision-making
5.2.1 Different Decision-making Models Exemplified in Truth-telling
5.2.1.1 Patient Knows First in the West
5.2.1.2 Family Know First in China
5.2.2 Different Decision-making Models Exemplified in Informed Consent
5.2.2.1 Informed Consent—A Borrowed Concept
5.2.2.2 Western Autonomy as the Kernel of Informed Consent
5.2.2.3 Chinese Family-consent Model of Informed Consent
CHAPTER Ⅵ WAY TO DEAL WITH CULTURAL DISSENSUS
6.1 Communicating and Making Decisions in the “Field”
6.2 Promotion of Cultural Tolerance
6.3 Commensurability of Western autonomy and Confucian Familism
CHAPTER Ⅶ CONCLUSION
7.1 Implications for Future Studies
7.2 Limitations of the Study
WORKS CITED
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]当代生命伦理学困惑疏解的儒学观照[J]. 任嫦勤,李明. 岭南学刊. 2011(05)
[2]儒家伦理对当代生命伦理学发展的价值及其局限[J]. 程新宇. 伦理学研究. 2009(03)
[3]儒家生命伦理学何以可能?[J]. 张舜清. 道德与文明. 2008(04)
[4]病人自主性与家庭本位主义之间的张力[J]. 雷锦程. 医学与哲学(人文社会医学版). 2008(03)
[5]试论生命伦理学的自主性原则[J]. 黄发林. 重庆工学院学报. 2006(03)
[6]论知情同意的中国本土化——中国文化视野中的知情同意走向[J]. 张英涛,孙福川. 医学与哲学. 2004(09)
[7]人本主义与生命伦理学[J]. 屈志勤,苏海琼. 医学与哲学. 2000(12)
[8]面对科技,生命何以自处──论北美生命伦理学[J]. 许志伟. 复旦学报(社会科学版). 1999(02)
硕士论文
[1]现代死亡观与传统道德的冲突与化解[D]. 王明丽.第四军医大学 2011
[2]生命伦理学在我国本土化发展的研究[D]. 高薇.第四军医大学 2010
[3]我国人体器官异体移植的伦理问题研究[D]. 周祯宇.重庆师范大学 2010
[4]伦理学视阈中的安乐死问题研究[D]. 胡以贵.曲阜师范大学 2007
[5]安乐死的伦理学辩护[D]. 王进.湖南师范大学 2006
[6]文化学视野下的安乐死问题研究[D]. 张磊.南京理工大学 2005
[7]中美生命伦理学的比较研究[D]. 土丽艳.第四军医大学 2002
本文编号：3171656
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yiyuanguanlilunwen/3171656.html
