某电子企业噪声职业危害风险评估方法对比研究

发布时间：2018-06-06 06:02

  本文选题：职业健康 + 噪声　； 参考：《首都经济贸易大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：如今中国作为发展中国家的领头羊,综合实力越来越强,在国际上的影响力也越来越大,工业发展水平越来越高,电子企业的前景越来越好,数量也急剧增长。目前,中国已经成为全球最大的电子设备产品制造基地,可是在电子设备制造过程中涉及到切割、打磨等工艺,捣碎机、切割机、打磨机及包装机等是必不可少的设备,这些设备除了维修时暂时停止工作,其余时间均处于运行状态,工作环境噪声大,持续时间长,长此下去,会对职工身心健康造成伤害,因此该类型企业噪声的影响状况也是不容忽视的。为了增强电子行业噪声的职业健康管理工作,避免噪声的过度暴露对职工身心健康的影响,减少资源浪费,国家应该对电子企业噪声问题突出的车间进行噪声的职业健康风险评价研究。1目的本次研究是为了分析对照职业卫生MES评价法、澳大利亚职业健康风险评估模型、ICMM职业健康风险评估模型和职业危害风险指数法四种评估方法在电子企业噪声职业危害风险评估中的使用,联合噪声现场检测结果,寻找电子企业中针对噪声评价的方法或者组合,为我国噪声职业健康风险评估准则提供依据。2方法选择该电子企业噪声暴露严重的车间作为研究对象,采用现场检测及多种职业健康风险评估模型进行评价。3结论通过对噪声的现场检测及四种职业危害风险评估方法的应用可得出以下结论:(1)该企业噪声暴露严重的车间有:动力水处理车间、空调机房、空压机房、废水鼓风机房、溅射车间;(2)通过现场检测发现各车间噪声暴露情况有所差异,总体来看,各车间中控室噪声暴露在规定限值内。除此之外,动力水处理车间总体处于噪声超标状态;空调机房主机、压力表、循环水泵处噪声都超标;空压机房中空压机和铆钉机处噪声超标;废水鼓风机房中鼓风机处噪声超标;溅射车间中溅射设备和清洗设备处噪声超标;(3)通过采用不同方法评价该企业噪声发现动力水处理车间和空调机房噪声暴露最为严重,风险等级最高,空压机房、溅射车间和废水鼓风机房噪声等级稍低。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, as the leader of developing countries, China has more and more comprehensive strength, more and more influence in the world, higher and higher level of industrial development, and the prospect of electronic enterprises is getting better and better, and the number of electronic enterprises is also increasing rapidly. At present, China has become the largest manufacturing base for electronic equipment products in the world. However, in the process of manufacturing electronic equipment, it involves cutting, grinding and other processes, as well as mashing machines, cutting machines, grinding machines and packaging machines, and so on. In addition to the temporary suspension of work during maintenance, these equipment are all in operation during the rest of the time. The working environment is noisy and lasts for a long time. In the long run, it will cause harm to the physical and mental health of the workers and staff. Therefore, the impact of this type of enterprise noise is not to be ignored. In order to enhance the occupational health management of noise in the electronics industry, to avoid the effect of excessive exposure of noise on the physical and mental health of workers, and to reduce the waste of resources, The State should study the Occupational Health risk Assessment of noise in the Workshop where the noise problem in Electronic Enterprises is prominent. Objective this study is to analyze and compare the occupational health MES evaluation method. Australian Occupational Health risk Assessment Model ICMM Occupational Health risk Assessment Model and Occupational Hazard risk Index method are used in noise occupational hazard risk assessment of electronic enterprises. To find out the method or combination of noise evaluation in electronic enterprise, to provide the basis for the noise occupational health risk assessment criterion of our country, to select the workshop where the electronic enterprise is seriously exposed to noise as the research object. Using field detection and multiple occupational health risk assessment models to evaluate .3 conclusion the following conclusions can be drawn from the noise field detection and the application of four occupational hazard risk assessment methods: 1) this enterprise is seriously exposed to noise. Workshop: power water treatment workshop, Air conditioning room, air compressor room, waste water blower room and sputtering workshop (2) the noise exposure of each workshop was found to be different by field test. In general, the noise exposure of the control room in each workshop was within the prescribed limit value. In addition, the power water treatment workshop is generally in the state of noise exceeding the standard; the noise of the main engine, pressure gauge and circulating water pump in the air conditioning room is over the standard; the noise of the air compressor and the riveting machine in the air compressor room is over the standard; The noise of the blowers in the waste water blower room exceeded the standard, and the noise of the sputtering equipment and the cleaning equipment in the sputtering workshop exceeded the standard. By using different methods to evaluate the noise of the enterprise, it was found that the noise exposure was the most serious in the power water treatment workshop and the air-conditioning room. The highest risk level, air compressor room, sputtering workshop and wastewater blower noise level.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：R134

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前10条

1 冯洪杰;甘亚弟;吕玉奎;;一起天那水引起的急性职业性中毒事故分析[J];中国卫生检验杂志;2016年16期

2 崔守明;刘纪青;方绍峰;张向群;;一起隐匿式职业性急性砷化氢中毒死亡事故调查[J];职业卫生与应急救援;2016年04期

3 杨雪莹;刘静;田丽萍;李梅莉;;2005—2014年天津市部分职业病流行病学特征分析[J];职业与健康;2016年16期

4 李敏嫣;黄德寅;张倩;刘茂;;噪声暴露所致听力损失的风险评价方法在职业病危害评价中的应用[J];中国工业医学杂志;2015年06期

5 鹿凯;谢锋;杜文霞;孙苑菡;常志强;;职业健康暴露风险评估法在某新型工艺建设项目职业病危害预评价中的应用[J];中国卫生工程学;2015年04期

6 周桂侠;宋小和;高青;曲波;;ICMM职业健康风险评估模型在某金融机具工程项目职业病危害评价中的应用[J];职业与健康;2014年22期

7 翁雪梅;王洁;闻建范;;127例申请诊断职业性噪声聋病例的诊断体会[J];职业卫生与应急救援;2014年05期

8 章剑;施爱民;陈献文;张巧耕;周维新;;半定量职业危害风险评估法在某市电焊行业锰危害因素评价中的应用[J];中国工业医学杂志;2014年04期

9 陈昌可;盛金芳;李常勇;;浙江省富阳市造纸行业职业危害风险评估[J];环境与职业医学;2014年07期

10 温翠菊;陈建雄;李荣忠;黎丽春;吴霞;;3种风险评价方法在化学毒物职业危害风险评价与管理中的应用与分析[J];中国卫生工程学;2014年03期

中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前1条

1 钱平;我国职业卫生工作的现状、问题与对策[D];华东师范大学;2007年

，

本文编号：1985460