中文版物质使用风险评估量表初步修订及信、效度评价

发布时间：2018-06-23 12:11

本文选题：中文版物质使用风险评估量表(SURPS) + 修订　；参考：《中国公共卫生》2017年05期

【摘要】：目的初步修订中文版物质使用风险评估量表(SURPS),并评价其信度和效度,为该量表在中国的推广使用提供科学依据。方法通过双向翻译获得中文版SURPS初版量表,结合中国小学生特点初步对该初版量表的理论结构进行修订,并采用项目分析、探索性因子分子、验证性因子分析和信效度检验方法对广西壮族自治区百色市2014年3月—2015年6月抽取的3所小学共948名小学生的物质使用风险进行分析,验证该量表理论结构的合理性。结果修订后的中文版SURPS模型与原量表因子拟合指数基本达到可接受的标准,探索性因子分析结果显示,中文版SURPS量表4个公因子的累计方差贡献率为54.16%,各条目所属因子结构与原量表基本一致;验证性因子分析结果显示,χ~2/df为5.214,近似误差均方根为0.063,拟合优度指数、调整拟合优度指数、规范拟合指数、增量拟合指数分别为0.889、0.862、0.898、0.893;修订后的中文版SURPS量表具有较好的项目区分度,各条目得分与其所属维度得分的相关系数均在0.667~0.818(均P0.001);量表总体Cronbach'sα系数和重测信度分别为0.801和0.776,感觉寻求、绝望、焦虑敏感、冲动4个维度的Cronbach'sα系数为0.698~0.811,重测信度为0.601~0.754。结论修订的中文版SURPS量表在中国小学生中的信度和效度指标均符合心理测量学的要求,可适用于我国青少年物质使用相关个体特征因素的风险评估。
[Abstract]:Objective to preliminarily revise the Chinese version of the material use risk assessment scale (SURPS), and evaluate its reliability and validity, and provide a scientific basis for the promotion and use of the scale in China. Methods the Chinese version of the first edition of SURPS was obtained through two-way translation, and the theoretical structure of the first edition was revised with the characteristics of Chinese primary school students, and the project was adopted. Analysis, exploratory factor molecule, confirmatory factor analysis and reliability and validity test method to analyze the material use risk of 948 primary school students from 3 primary schools in Baise, the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from March 2014 to June 2015, to verify the rationality of the theoretical structure of the scale. The revised Chinese version of SURPS model and the original scale factor The fitting index basically reached acceptable standard. The result of exploratory factor analysis showed that the cumulative variance contribution of the 4 public factors of the Chinese version of the SURPS scale was 54.16%. The structure of the factors belonging to each item was basically the same as the original scale. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the x ~2/df was 5.214, the approximate error mean square root was 0.063, the goodness of fit index was adjusted. The overall fit index, the standard fitting index and the incremental fitting index are 0.889,0.862,0.898,0.893, and the revised Chinese version of the SURPS scale has a better item division, and the correlation coefficient between the scores of each item and its dimension is 0.667~0.818 (all P0.001), and the overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient and retest reliability of the scale are 0.801, respectively. And 0.776, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of sensation seeking, despair, anxiety sensitivity, impulse 4 dimensions is 0.698~0.811, the retest reliability of the retested Chinese version of the revised Chinese version of the SURPS scale in Chinese primary school students is in conformity with the requirements of psychometrics, and can be applied to the individual characteristics of the physical use of young people in China. Risk assessment.
【作者单位】：右江民族医学院公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学教研室;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金(81260431) 2013年广西自然科学基金面上项目(2013GXNSFAA019237)
【分类号】：R179

【相似文献】