不同方法测量不规则瘢痕面积的比较

发布时间：2018-02-27 11:51

本文关键词： 法医学瘢痕面积测量　出处：《法医学杂志》2016年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的对比不同测量方法在测量不规则瘢痕面积时的优缺点,以确定不规则瘢痕面积测量标准。方法对不规则瘢痕面积进行数字化扫描,运用坐标纸读取法、Auto CAD像素法、Photoshop套索像素法、Photoshop魔棒填充像素法及福昕PDF阅读软件测量法进行测量,从测量时间、可重复性、是否可以全程记录及是否可以溯源等方面进行比较分析。结果采用上述瘢痕面积测量方法的结果差异无统计学意义,但在测量时间、同一人多次重复性及多人测量可重复性上差异存在统计学意义,仅福昕PDF阅读软件可以溯源。结论上述方法均可应用于瘢痕测量,但是各有利弊,还需针对司法鉴定开发新的测量软件。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the advantages and disadvantages of different measurement methods in measurement of irregular scar area, to determine the measurement standard of irregular scar area. Methods to scan digital irregular scar area, the use of paper reading method, Auto CAD Photoshop pixel method, Lasso pixel method, Photoshop method and pixel filling wand Foxit PDF reading software measurement method measured from the measurement time, repeatability, whether can record and can be traced back and so on. The scar area measurements showed no significant difference, but in the measuring time, the same person repeatedly and many people can be measured statistically significant repeatability differences, only Foxit PDF reader software can be traced. The conclusion of these methods can be applied to the measurement of scar, but each has its advantages and disadvantages, the need for the development of the judicial identification of the new measuring software.

【作者单位】：司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所上海市法医学重点实验室上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台;北京市丰台区公安司法鉴定中心;杭州明皓司法鉴定所;
【基金】：中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费资助项目(GY2016G-2) 上海市法医学重点实验室资助项目(14DZ2270800) 上海市司法鉴定专业技术服务平台资助项目(16DZ2290900)
【分类号】：D919

【相似文献】