影像引导下放射治疗脊柱肿瘤六自由度摆位误差分析
本文选题:脊椎肿瘤 切入点:放射疗法 出处:《北京大学学报(医学版)》2015年06期
【摘要】:目的:探讨颈椎、胸椎及腰椎肿瘤在锥形束CT(cone beam CT,CBCT)影像引导下的调强放射治疗(image guided radiation therapy,IGRT)六自由度摆位误差分析。方法:收集2013年5月至2014年6月在北京大学第三医院行脊柱恶性肿瘤放疗的患者30例,其中颈椎肿瘤10例,胸椎肿瘤10例,腰椎肿瘤10例。采用瑞典医科达(ELEKTA)公司AXESSE直线加速器CBCT引导,用Hexa PODTMevoRT床从平移和旋转六自由度方向在线校正摆位误差,CT模拟定位获取治疗计划参考图像(层厚3 mm,120 k V,200 m As)。每次治疗前行千伏级(k V级)CBCT扫描(100 k V,36.6 m As,s20射野准直器),CBCT图像采用骨窗模式与计划参考图像自动匹配,并经高资质医师和物理师共同确认,误差校正后再次行CBCT扫描,将两次图像与计划参考图像分别进行匹配验证。本研究共收集838次摆位校正前、后匹配结果,分别记录患者平移摆位误差左右方向X(lateral)、进出方向Y(lngitudinal)、升降方向Z(vertical)、旋转误差俯仰方向RX(pitch)、滚动方向RY(roll)及左右旋转方向RZ(yaw)匹配结果。应用SPSS13.0统计软件,对Hexa PODTMevoRT床校正前后位移误差数据行配对t检验。结果:椎体肿瘤摆位误差(绝对值)中,3个平移X、Y和Z方向摆位误差结果分别为颈椎(1.71±0.10)mm、(1.81±0.11)mm和(1.94±0.09)mm;胸椎(3.17±0.19)mm、(4.26±0.28)mm和(2.18±0.12)mm;腰椎(2.69±0.24)mm、(3.33±0.26)mm和(2.86±0.21)mm。患者摆位后首次CBCT获得摆位误差数据与误差纠正后(动床后)再次CBCT验证后获得残余误差数据3个平移X、Y和Z方向分别为颈椎(0.5±2.4)mm、(0.01±2.4)mm和(2.4±1.4)mm,胸椎(1.17±0.11)mm、(0.26±0.30)mm和(0.08±0.12)mm,腰椎(1.09±0.24)mm、(2.03±1.26)mm和(0.06±0.51)mm。进行配对t检验结果:颈椎及胸椎平移3个方向误差纠正前后差异均有统计学意义;腰椎仅是升降Z方向平移误差纠正前后差异统计学有意义(t=-3.518,P0.001)。3个旋转RX、RY和RZ方向摆位误差分别为颈椎肿瘤0.67°±0.04°、1.06°±0.06°和0.78°±0.05°,胸椎0.62°±0.05°、0.75°±0.06°和0.84°±0.06°,腰椎0.59°±0.06°、0.80°±0.07°和0.73°±0.06°;误差纠正后(动床后)再次CBCT验证后获得残余误差数据3个旋转方向RX、RY和RZ方向分别为颈椎肿瘤0.27°±0.14°、1.20°±0.04°和0.28°±0.05°,胸椎0.02°±0.20°、0.05°±0.26°和0.64°±0.16°,腰椎0.09°±0.26°、0.50°±0.05°和0.03°±0.16°,误差纠正前后颈椎和腰椎旋转3个方向差异均具有统计学意义,胸椎仅是滚动方向RY方向差异有统计学意义(t=7.106,P0.001)。30例患者疼痛均有缓解,未发现放疗副反应。结论:IGRT下Hexa PODTMevoRT床对脊柱肿瘤放射治疗的摆位误差纠正有明显作用,建议采用在线校正脊柱肿瘤放射治疗摆位误差。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the cervical vertebrae, The 6-DOF positioning error analysis of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for thoracic and lumbar spine tumors under the guidance of cone-beam CT(cone beam CT imaging. Methods: from May 2013 to June 2014, spinal malignancy was performed in the third Hospital of Peking University. 30 patients with tumor radiotherapy, 10 cases of cervical spine tumors, 10 cases of thoracic tumors and 10 cases of lumbar vertebrae tumors were guided by AXESSE linear accelerator (CBCT) of Swedish medical company ELEKTAA. The Hexa PODTMevoRT bed is used for on-line correction of the pendulum error from translation and rotation in six degrees of freedom direction. Ct simulation location is used to obtain the treatment plan reference image (3 mm thickness of 120kV / 200m ASL). Before each treatment, the KV / V level of Hexa PODTMevoRT is scanned with 100kV / 36.6 m / s / s 20 beam field. The CBCT image of collimator is automatically matched by bone window mode and plan reference image. After error correction, CBCT scanning was performed again, and the two images and the planned reference images were matched and verified respectively. In this study, a total of 838 pendulum correction results were collected before and after pendulum correction. The matching results were recorded respectively in the right and left directions of the swinging error, in the direction of entry and exit, in the direction of entrance and exit, in the direction of lifting and descending, in the direction of pitching of rotation error, in the direction of pitching, in the direction of rolling, and in the direction of left and right rotation, respectively. SPSS13.0 statistical software was used. The displacement error data before and after correction of Hexa PODTMevoRT bed were tested by paired t test. Results: of the three lateral displacement errors (absolute values) of vertebral body tumor, the results were 1.71 卤0.10mm 卤1.81 卤0.11)mm and 1.94 卤0.09mm for the cervical vertebrae, 3.17 卤0.19mm and 2.18 卤0.12mm for the thoracic vertebrae, 2.69 卤0.24mm and 3.33 卤0.26)mm for the lumbar vertebrae respectively, and 2.69 卤0.24mm and 3.33 卤0.26)mm for the lumbar vertebrae, respectively. After the first CBCT was obtained and the error corrected (after the moving bed) was again verified by CBCT, the remaining error data were obtained. The three translational error data were obtained in the cervical spine (0.5 卤2.4 mm) and Z direction (0.01 卤2.4 卤1.4 mm), the thoracic vertebrae (1.17 卤0.11 mm) were 0.26 卤0.30)mm and 0.08 卤0.12 mm, the lumbar vertebrae were 1.09 卤0.24 mm, 2.03 卤1.26)mm and 0.06 卤0.51 mm respectively. The results of paired t test showed that there were significant differences between the three direction errors of cervical vertebra and thoracic vertebrae before and after correction. There were significant differences between the lumbar vertebrae before and after correction of the Z direction translation error. The three rotation RXRY and RZ positioning errors were 0.67 掳卤0.04 掳1.06 掳卤0.06 掳and 0.78 掳卤0.05 掳respectively, thoracic vertebrae 0.62 掳卤0.05 掳0.75 掳卤0.06 掳and 0.84 掳卤0.06 掳, lumbar vertebrae 0.59 掳卤0.06 掳0.80 掳卤0.07 掳and 0.73 掳卤0.06 掳respectively. The residual error data obtained by CBCT were: cervical spine tumor 0.27 掳卤0.14 掳1.20 掳卤0.04 掳and RZ direction 0.28 掳卤0.04 掳, thoracic vertebra 0.02 掳卤0.20 掳0.05 掳卤0.26 掳and 0.64 掳卤0.16 掳, lumbar spine 0.09 掳卤0.26 掳0.50 掳卤0.05 掳and 0.03 掳卤0.16 掳respectively. There was significant difference in the direction RY of thoracic vertebrae in rolling direction. The pain was alleviated in all 30 patients, but no side effects of radiotherapy were found. Conclusion the Hexa PODTMevoRT bed has a significant effect on correction of positioning error in radiotherapy of spinal tumors under the condition of 1: IGRT.Conclusion\\\; It is suggested that the alignment error of radiotherapy for spinal tumors should be corrected on line.
【作者单位】: 北京大学第三医院肿瘤放射治疗科;
【分类号】:R730.55;R738.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 董清;陈勇;刘伟;辛勇;;头颈部肿瘤精确放疗摆位误差的分析[J];齐齐哈尔医学院学报;2012年02期
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 安继业;李悦溪;吕旭东;段会龙;;基于三维可视化的放疗摆位误差测量方法[J];中国医疗器械杂志;2007年05期
2 沈海英;沈琰琦;李永春;陈剑;夏怡;李云海;;电子射野影像装置用于监控放射治疗中初次摆位误差的研究[J];生物医学工程与临床;2010年04期
3 李明;储开岳;徐雪峰;;放疗中床高变化与摆位误差的相关性研究[J];实用癌症杂志;2011年06期
4 阎华伟;金献测;周永强;杨桂强;吴志勤;潘函慧;谢聪颖;;胸部肿瘤放射治疗固定与摆位误差研究[J];中国辐射卫生;2013年03期
5 陈德路;;头颈部精确定位摆位仪的摆位误差研究[J];中国医学物理学杂志;2010年05期
6 党杰;艾克热木·木沙;;适形调强放射治疗校正摆位误差分析[J];新疆医科大学学报;2012年03期
7 张美英,狄小云;激光校正摆位误差1000野分析[J];浙江肿瘤;1997年01期
8 郭小琳;王小虎;高力英;赵林;刘志强;;利用射野照相验证片对胸部肿瘤放疗摆位误差的分析[J];卫生职业教育;2014年15期
9 杨树松,王凡,孙维凯,刘建海,刘启平,李文;治疗床面下垂导致的系统摆位误差分析及对策[J];中华放射肿瘤学杂志;2001年01期
10 王鑫,胡超苏,应红梅;放射治疗中的摆位误差[J];肿瘤防治杂志;2004年11期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 沈海英;沈琰琦;李云海;傅维平;康鸿;李永春;董海权;;利用电子射野影像装置进行放疗摆位误差的研究[A];中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会六届二次暨中国抗癌协会肿瘤放疗专业委员会二届二次学术会议论文集[C];2009年
2 吴章桂;黄家文;杨海松;刘利彬;陈宝录;黄丽娜;黄清秀;;体重变化对体部放疗摆位误差的分析[A];中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会六届二次暨中国抗癌协会肿瘤放疗专业委员会二届二次学术会议论文集[C];2009年
3 张连胜;张寅;翟万聪;许京京;肖泽芬;;头颈肩罩与塑体模在食道癌放疗固定中的摆位误差比较[A];中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会六届二次暨中国抗癌协会肿瘤放疗专业委员会二届二次学术会议论文集[C];2009年
4 黄丽娜;;图像引导技术对放疗摆位误差的影响[A];中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会六届二次暨中国抗癌协会肿瘤放疗专业委员会二届二次学术会议论文集[C];2009年
5 胡明民;肖锋;陆宙;孙朝阳;刘晓莉;陆军;石梅;;三维适形放疗摆位误差分析[A];2007第六届全国放射肿瘤学学术年会论文集[C];2007年
6 叶新芊;应惟良;;热塑面罩体位固定技术摆位误差的测量[A];2007第六届全国放射肿瘤学学术年会论文集[C];2007年
7 庞庭田;邱杰;杨波;张福泉;;CBCT在放疗摆位误差中的应用分析[A];中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会六届二次暨中国抗癌协会肿瘤放疗专业委员会二届二次学术会议论文集[C];2009年
8 王艳阳;傅小龙;樊e,
本文编号:1698387
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yundongyixue/1698387.html