当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 特种医学论文 >

能谱成像技术在减除脊柱金属植入物伪影方面的临床应用价值

发布时间:2018-04-15 00:22

  本文选题:宝石CT + 脊柱 ; 参考:《山西医科大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的:探讨宝石CT能谱成像技术在去除脊柱金属植入物放射状伪影方面的最佳的成像的单能量点,并评价其临床应用价值。 方法:对20例在我院行脊柱外科手术,,并植入金属固定物的患者行宝石CT能谱扫描,扫描后获得(120Kvp)混合能量图像及70Kev单能量图像。用能谱分析软件(GSI viewer)进行分析,在40-140Kev(间距10Kev)重建11种单能量图像,然后选取最佳单能量图像行金属伪影消除重建(Metal-Artifacts Reduction System,MARs),获得MARs能谱图像(110Kev单能量+MARs图像)。由本科室3名高年资放射科诊断医师参照使用4分量表[1],来对采集的图像质量高低进行主观目测评分;测量的放射状伪影为植入椎弓根螺钉前端伪影长度以评价其伪影轻重程度;于每组图像中选取伪影最重层面(A)行两次SD值测定记录为SD1、SD2,同时选择无或少伪影层面(B)行SD值测定记录为SD0,作为正常对照。对所获得数据采用spps17.0统计学软件包,进行配对t检验数据分析。 结果:在11种单能量图像组中,随着Kev的增加,伪影长度将逐渐缩短,在110-140Kev区间伪影长度接近于零,且在此区间各组间伪影长度无明显差异;110Kev单能量图像组的伪影指数和噪声值最小,主观评分最高,因此所有20例患者的图像均于110Kev行MARs重建。MARs能谱图像组(110Kev单能量+MARS图像)与混合能量图像组的主观评分及伪影长度之间均存在显著性差异(P=0.0000.05),即MARs单能量图像组的脊柱金属植入物放射状伪影与混合能量组相比,伪影程度明显降低,图像质量较混合能量图像组显著提高。MARs能谱图像组与最佳单能量图像组的伪影长度及噪声值之间存在差异,即MARs能谱图像组较单能量图像组的图像质量有所提高。 结论:在钛合金材质的脊柱金属植入物患者的单能量图像组中,110Kev为图像质量最佳的单能量成像点。在减除钛合金材质的脊柱金属植入物伪影时应联合应用单能量技术和MARs技术。宝石CT能谱成像技术能够显著减少脊柱金属植入物的伪影,使CT图像的质量明显提高,具有较高的临床应用价值。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the best single energy point for removing radioactive artifacts from metal implants of spine by using gemstone CT energy spectrum imaging technique and to evaluate its clinical value.Methods: twenty patients who underwent spinal surgery in our hospital and were implanted with metal fixator were scanned by Sapphire CT energy spectrum. After scanning, mixed energy images and 70Kev single energy images were obtained.Eleven kinds of single energy images were reconstructed by using the energy spectrum analysis software (GSI viewer), and 11 kinds of single energy images were reconstructed in 40-140 Kevin (interval 10 Kevin). Then the best single energy images were selected for metal artifact elimination and reconstruction of Metal-Artifacts Reduction system Myers, and 110 Kev single energy MARs images were obtained.Three senior radiologists in our department used 4 subscales [1] to evaluate the quality of the collected images.The radial artifact was measured as the anterior artifact length of pedicle screw implantation to evaluate the degree of artifact.Two SD values were recorded as SD1 / SD2 in each group of images, and SD0 was used as the normal control.The obtained data were analyzed by spps17.0 statistical software package and paired t test data.Results: in 11 groups of single energy images, with the increase of Kev, the length of artifacts was gradually shortened, and the length of artifacts was close to zero in the range of 110-140Kev.In this interval, there was no significant difference in artifact length among groups. The artifact index and noise value of 110Kev single energy image group was the smallest, and the subjective score was the highest.Therefore, there was significant difference in the subjective score and artifact length between the 110Kev reconstruction of all 20 patients and the mixed energy image group (110Kev single energy MARS image), that is, the MARs single energy image group, that is, the MARs single energy image group.The radial artifacts of the metal implants in the spine were compared to those of the mixed energy group.Compared with the mixed energy image group, the artifact length and noise value of the energy spectrum image group and the best single energy image group were significantly improved, and there were differences between the artifact length and the noise value of the best single energy image group.That is, the image quality of MARs energy spectrum image group is better than that of single energy image group.Conclusion: 110Kev is the best single energy imaging point in the single energy image group of patients with titanium alloy spinal metal implants.Single energy technique and MARs technique should be used in removing the artifacts of titanium alloy metal implants.Gem CT energy dispersive imaging technique can significantly reduce the artifact of spinal metal implants and improve the quality of CT images, which has high clinical application value.
【学位授予单位】:山西医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:R816.8

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 谷建伟,张丽,陈志强,邢宇翔,高河伟;工业CT图像的伪影成因和校正方法综述[J];CT理论与应用研究;2005年03期

2 童双立;多层螺旋CT的新进展[J];CT理论与应用研究;2005年04期

3 周泽俊;胡永胜;高斌;巢惠民;;多层螺旋CT图像伪影的分析[J];中国CT和MRI杂志;2008年05期

4 白玫;郑钧正;;多排(层)螺旋CT的辐射剂量表达及其影响因素探讨[J];辐射防护;2008年01期

5 刘战存;王立军;吴继光;;CT技术发明的历史回顾[J];首都师范大学学报(自然科学版);2008年03期

6 陈群英;吕玉玲;张西亚;;CT探测器技术特性与新材质的临床应用[J];生物医学工程与临床;2010年01期

7 赖胜圣;杨蕊梦;;CT图像伪影及处理方法[J];数理医药学杂志;2009年02期

8 宁国庆;黄召勤;袁先顺;吕守臣;刘庆伟;;能谱成像技术去除金属伪影的临床价值[J];医学影像学杂志;2011年09期

9 路鹤晴;朱国英;卓维海;郭常义;高林峰;刘海宽;;医用X射线CT辐射剂量影响因素研究[J];上海医学影像;2008年02期

10 郑国祥;;浅谈CT技术的发展与应用[J];医药世界;2007年01期



本文编号:1751692

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yundongyixue/1751692.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户143af***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com