PNF技术与冲击波对肱二头肌长头肌腱腱鞘炎干预效果的对比分析

发布时间：2018-05-21 05:36

本文选题：肱二头肌长头肌腱腱鞘炎 + PNF　；参考：《运动》2016年24期

【摘要】：针对肱二头肌长头肌腱腱鞘炎采用不同的干预方式,对干预前、后的治疗效果进行纵向对比分析,寻找更加有效且易于推广的干预方式。方法:北京体育大学肱二头肌长头肌腱腱鞘炎运动员15名,随机分为超短波组、PNF组和冲击波组,每组5人。评价指标包括VAS疼痛评分,肩关节屈曲、外旋活动度,肱二头肌和旋后肌(冈下肌和小圆肌)肌力,运动员肩关节评估量表。PNF组选用上肢D2模式,3次/周,4组/次,20次/组;冲击波治疗7天/次,2 000次/次,强度控制在患者的VAS 3~4分左右;超短波、PNF组和冲击波组3组均需每天进行超短波治疗,剂量为强,15min/天。结果:PNF技术在缓解疼痛,增加肩关节屈曲和旋后肌肌力及肩关节功能能力的改善等方面效果显著(P0.05);而在改善肩关节活动度方面冲击波组的效果显著(P0.05)。结论:PNF技术和冲击波对肱二头肌长头肌腱腱鞘炎的干预均有效果,但表现在不同的方面,在实际治疗中可以将2种适当结合,配合超短波,效果更佳。
[Abstract]:Different intervention methods were adopted in view of long head tenosynovitis of biceps brachii. The treatment effect before and after intervention was compared and analyzed longitudinally in order to find more effective and easy to popularize intervention. Methods: fifteen athletes with tenosynovitis of long head of biceps brachii were randomly divided into two groups: ultrashort wave group (PNF) and shock wave group (n = 5). The evaluation indexes included VAS pain score, shoulder flexion, circumflex activity, biceps brachii muscle and muscle strength of pronator muscle (infraspinal muscle and lesser circle muscle). The intensity of shock wave therapy was about 3 ~ 4 minutes after 7 days of shock wave therapy, and ultrashort wave therapy was needed every day in both ultrashort wave group and shock wave group with a dose of 15 min / day. Results the effects of WPNF technique on relieving pain, improving shoulder flexion, muscle strength of pronator muscle and functional ability of shoulder joint were significantly improved, while that of shock wave group in improving motion of shoulder joint was significant (P0.05). Conclusion both of the two techniques were effective in the treatment of tenosynovitis of the long head of biceps brachii muscle, but the two methods could be combined properly and combined with ultrashort wave in different aspects.
【作者单位】：北京体育大学;
【分类号】：G808

【相似文献】