视野有效值法和视野评分法评定视野损害的比较和评价

发布时间：2018-05-31 08:56

本文选题：法医临床学 + 视野评定　；参考：《中国法医学杂志》2016年01期

【摘要】：视野有效值法和视野评分法分别是当前国内、外用于评定视野损害的主要方法,本文对这两种方法的主要内容、计算过程进行分析和比较。视野有效值法较便捷,可操作性强,当视野缺损位于周边视野时,视野有效值法适用性较好,但视野缺损累及中心10°视野时,存在较大误差,使用时应结合视力受损程度、其他检查等综合分析。视野评分法有诸多特殊规定,操作较繁琐,但更具科学性、准确性,在法医学鉴定中的应用前景值得期待,其依据的科学理念也值得在制修订相关标准时予以关注和借鉴。
[Abstract]:The visual field effective value method and the visual field score method are the main methods used to evaluate the visual field damage at home and abroad. This paper analyzes and compares the main contents of the two methods and the calculation process. The visual field effective value method is more convenient and maneuverable. When the visual field is located in the peripheral vision, the field of visual value is good, but the field of vision is good, but the field of vision is good, but the field of vision is good. When the defect involves the 10 degree vision of the center, there is a large error, which should be combined with the degree of visual impairment and other examination. The visual field score method has many special provisions, and the operation is more complicated, but more scientific and accurate, the prospect of application in forensic identification is worth looking forward to, and the scientific concept based on it is also worth the revision related. The standard should be paid attention to and used for reference.
【作者单位】：司法文明协同创新中心;中国政法大学证据科学教育部重点实验室;
【基金】：“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAK16B03) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81172912);国家自然科学基金应急管理项目(81450041)
【分类号】：D919.4

【相似文献】