核心稳定训练结合整脊术治疗运动员脊柱源慢性腰痛的研究

发布时间：2018-06-28 06:36

本文选题：核心稳定训练 + 整脊术　；参考：《天津体育学院学报》2016年03期

【摘要】：目的:通过采用综合疗法与单纯物理因子治疗进行对比,探讨以脊柱稳定系统为理论基础治疗运动员脊柱源慢性腰痛的可行性,为更好地评估治疗运动员慢性腰痛提供依据。方法:将49例样本随机分入实验组与对照组,实验组采用基于脊柱稳定系统理论的整脊术、核心稳定训练与物理因子进行治疗,对照组采用单纯物理因子治疗,共计12周。使用简式Mc Gill疼痛量表评分、指地距离和压力感应生物反馈测试评价运动员的康复指标,治疗前和第4、8、12周末进行评估。结果:所测数据均呈正态分布,实验组量表评分组内比较差异有统计学意义,对照组量表评分组内比较在治疗结束时与治疗前无显著性差异,组间比较治疗前无显著性差异,治疗后具有高度显著性差异。实验组指地距离组内比较均具有高度显著性差异,对照组指地距离组内比较除后伸外(P0.01)其他3组改善程度均不理想,其中前屈与左屈治疗结束时与治疗前比较无显著性差异,右屈在4次测量中均无显著性差异。组间比较治疗前无显著性差异,治疗后均呈现高度显著性差异。实验组腰背肌力组内比较均呈现高度显著性差异,对照组腰背肌力在治疗结束时与治疗前比较无显著性差异,组间比较治疗前无显著性差异,治疗后具有高度显著性差异。结论:基于脊柱稳定系统的评估方法可以较为准确反映运动员脊柱源慢性腰痛的程度,综合康复治疗方法在治疗运动员脊柱源慢性腰痛上优于单纯物理因子治疗。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the feasibility of treating athletes' chronic low back pain from spine based on spinal stabilization system by using comprehensive therapy and simple physical factor therapy, so as to provide a basis for better evaluation and treatment of athletes' chronic low back pain. Methods: 49 cases were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group was treated with spinal spine stabilization system theory, core stabilization training and physical factors were used, and the control group was treated with physical factor alone for 12 weeks. A simple Mc Gill pain scale was used to evaluate the rehabilitation indexes of athletes by means of ground distance and pressure-induced biofeedback test before treatment and at the end of the 812th week of the 4th week. Results: all the measured data were normal distribution. There were significant differences in the scores of the experimental group and the control group. There was no significant difference between the control group and the control group at the end of treatment and before treatment, but there was no significant difference between the two groups before treatment. There was a significant difference after treatment. There were significant differences between the experimental group and the control group, except for the extension (P0.01). There was no significant difference at the end of the treatment between flexion and left flexion, and there was no significant difference between the control group and the control group at the end of treatment. There was no significant difference in the right flexion among the four measurements. There was no significant difference before and after treatment. In the experimental group, there was a significant difference between the two groups, but there was no significant difference between the two groups at the end of treatment and before treatment, but there was a significant difference between the two groups after treatment. Conclusion: the evaluation method based on spine stabilization system can accurately reflect the degree of chronic low back pain caused by spine in athletes. Comprehensive rehabilitation therapy is superior to physical factor therapy in the treatment of chronic low back pain caused by spine in athletes.
【作者单位】：国家体育总局训练局体能康复中心;
【基金】：广东省体育局2014年科研项目(项目编号:GDSS2014164)
【分类号】：R87

【相似文献】