对比剂对不同心功能患者肾功能的影响
[Abstract]:Objective: With the progress of the technology of cardiovascular interventional diagnosis and treatment, the clinical application of the contrast agent is more and more, and the contrast agent nephropathy (CIN) has become a common complication after the interventional diagnosis and treatment, and the third major cause of the acquired renal failure after operation and infection, The incidence was about 11%[1]. At the same time, CIN is the third big problem after the "restenosis" and the "Thrombus" in the intervention field. In addition, the incidence of death and adverse events in the hospital is also increased, and the incidence of death and adverse events in the hospital is also increased. At present, the pathogenesis of CIN is still unclear, and there is no positive effective treatment method. Congestive heart failure is the independent risk factor of the contrast agent nephropathy, and the decrease of the glomerular filtration rate is caused by the decrease in the blood volume of the heart and the decrease of the renal blood flow. The lower the glomerular filtration rate, the smaller the dose of the contrast agent required to cause the contrast nephropathy. A number of studies have shown that patients with cardiac function II and grade III congestive heart failure have a hierarchical relationship with the impairment of renal function[2]. The effect of contrast agent on the renal function of patients with different heart function was studied. Methods: During the period from November 2010 to October 2011, the patients with coronary heart disease were diagnosed as coronary heart disease,354 patients undergoing coronary intervention in the first affiliated hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology were the subject of the study, and the basic resources of the patients were recorded in detail. Of these,271 (76.6%) males and 83 (23.4%) females, with an average age of 62.18 and 9.35 Age: Coronary angiography is performed by the Judkins method for selective coronary angiography, and the contrast medium is selected with low-permeability non-ionic contrast agent, iopromide (Youwei)370 ). All patients with abnormal renal function were treated with hydration fluid for 6-12 hours before operation, and 0.9% sodium chloride injection was intravenously administered at a rate of 1 ml/ kg h and maintained to 6-12 hours after operation, with the dose of patients with cardiac function grade NYHAIII or above decreased. Half. According to the NYHA functional classification of the New York Heart Association (NYHA), the patients were divided into three groups: the heart function I-II was group A, the heart function class III was group B, and the heart function IV was group C; the three groups were divided into 1 and 2 groups according to the level of the blood myocardiac function:1 group and 120. mu. mol/ L; group 2,120. m L. The effect of the contrast agent on the renal function of three groups of patients with different heart function was observed. in response to exclusion: contrast agent, acute myocardial infarction, severe hepatic insufficiency, maintenance of hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, bleeding tendency, ventricular aneurysm and aortic dissection, malignancy, poor compliance and the like. The main observation indexes are as follows: 1. General conditions and basic diseases;2. NYHA functional classification; 3. The rate of glomerular filtration (GFR) and the clearance rate (Ccr) of the glomerular filtration rate (Ccr) and the color of the heart of the heart were calculated according to the level of the blood myocardiac muscle, the blood myocaryoid (Scr), the urea nitrogen (UN), the uric acid (UA), the atrial natriuretic peptide (BNP) were calculated. 4. The renal function of the patients with different heart function was analyzed by using the statistical analysis software SPSS17.0. The effect of the contrast agent on the renal function of patients with different heart function was studied. The stratified evaluation of pre-operative risk factors provides more evidence-based medicine. It was reported. Results:1. There was no statistical difference between the pre-operative renal function index, Scr, UN, UA, GFR and Ccr. The results showed that there was a significant difference in GFR and Ccr with the decrease of heart function and the decrease of GFR and Ccr with the function of heart function. There was no significant difference in GFR and Ccr, but there was no significant difference in GFR and Ccr, and the difference was of statistical significance. P0.001.2. There was no statistical difference between the pre-operative renal function index, Scr, UN, UA, GFR and Ccr. The results showed that there was a significant difference in GFR and Ccr with the decrease of heart function, and there was a difference in GFR and Ccr with the decrease of heart function. There was no significant difference in GFR and Ccr, but there was no significant difference in GFR and Ccr, and there was a significant difference in GFR and Ccr before operation. The incidence of CIN after percutaneous coronary intervention was 5 (5.05%) in the A1 group,12 in the B1 group (10.43%),36 in the C1 group (33.64%),1 (16.66%) in the A2 group,3 (25%) in the B2 group, and 7 in the C2 group. (46.66%). With the increase of cardiac function, the decrease of cardiac function and the decrease of EF, the incidence of CIN increased, and the difference was of statistical significance. The CI The incidence of N is the highest.4. (1) Three groups of patients with different cardiac function, with the decrease of heart function, BNP, the increase of Scr and the occurrence of CIN. The results showed that the rate of BNP, the increase of Scr and the incidence of CIN were higher than that of the blood. normal group Conclusion:1. The patients with different heart function in the same level of blood myocardiac function, with the increase of the function of heart function, the renal function after coronary intervention. the greater the decrease, the higher the incidence of CIN;2. the different blood in the same cardiac function Patients with the abnormal level of myocardiac muscle and the level of blood myocaryosis, and after coronary intervention The decrease of renal function was high, and the incidence of CIN was high;3. The level of the blood myocardiac muscle was abnormal and the group C2 of the NYHAIV grade of the heart function and the coronary intervention.
【学位授予单位】:河南科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:R816.2;R541.4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 詹玉香;;螺旋CT增强胸部扫描的临床分析[J];现代医药卫生;2011年16期
2 甘璐;;CT增强扫描中降低对比剂外溢的预防及护理[J];实用医技杂志;2011年08期
3 凌蓉;;CT增强扫描对比剂不良反应的预防及护理要点[J];医学信息(上旬刊);2011年05期
4 娄晶莹;胡春;;钆布醇[J];中国药物化学杂志;2011年04期
5 王淑慧;;磁共振增强对比剂渗漏致静脉炎护理体会[J];山西医药杂志(下半月刊);2011年06期
6 C.C.Tsui;J.S.Chiu;任宇靖;;缓泻-增强对比剂在FDG PET评价结直肠病灶的应用[J];国际医学放射学杂志;2011年04期
7 梁兆松;;十指功可改善心功能[J];心血管病防治知识;2008年06期
8 周继虎;池振海;陈远强;程银铸;;麝香保心丸治疗充血性心力衰竭的疗效观察[J];医药论坛杂志;2011年14期
9 周智鹏;张辉阳;邱维加;凌秀梅;苏寿红;陈德勤;殷亮;;根据体重个体化对比剂注射方案在64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像中的应用[J];放射学实践;2011年07期
10 孙志军;盖鲁粤;杨庭树;刘宏斌;陈练;蒋博;王锦达;;不同面积心肌梗死患者心功能减低及预后分析[J];中国循证心血管医学杂志;2011年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 袁颖;;CT检查中对比剂静脉注射的安全管理[A];中华护理学会2009全国静脉治疗护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2009年
2 胡玖益;黄原义;熊远奎;熊文斌;刘四斌;;16层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像对比剂剂量的对照性研究[A];2009中华医学会影像技术分会第十七次全国学术大会论文集[C];2009年
3 刘炳武;汪浩;;多层螺旋CT泌尿系成像技术探讨[A];2009中华医学会影像技术分会第十七次全国学术大会论文集[C];2009年
4 李强;李成义;;双通路手法推注对比剂肝脏CT增强扫描的临床应用[A];全国铁路第五届疾病控制学术研讨会论文集[C];2004年
5 戴雪芹;黄燕;杨晓露;张岐;胡琴;朱玉莲;;低聚壳聚糖修饰的磁共振成像对比剂的性能研究[A];海南省药学会二○一○年学术年会会议论文集[C];2010年
6 柳澄;;CTA中对比剂的应用[A];2005年全国医学影像技术学术会议西部论坛论文汇编[C];2005年
7 赵世华;;心脏MR对比剂研究现状、临床应用及其进展[A];2006年华东六省一市暨浙江省放射学学术年会论文汇编[C];2006年
8 陈江;;口服静脉用钆喷酸葡胺在MRCP检查中的应用[A];中华医学会第十三届全国放射学大会论文汇编(下册)[C];2006年
9 陈险峰;马兵毅;张晓青;韩湘蓉;;心脏大血管多层螺旋CT成像中对比剂不良反应个例分析[A];中华医学会第十三届全国放射学大会论文汇编(下册)[C];2006年
10 刘岘;林爱华;刘国清;刘波;;长效循环顺磁性脂质体对比剂的磁共振对比增强血管成像研究[A];第十一次全国中西医结合影像学术研讨会暨全国中西医结合影像学研究进展学习班资料汇编[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 朱国旺;对比剂安全性比成像效果更重要[N];中国医药报;2010年
2 本报记者 朱国旺;规范使用对比剂 从提高认知开始[N];中国医药报;2010年
3 小美;心功能“对号入座”[N];保健时报;2004年
4 黄源;BNP鉴定心功能 妙![N];医药经济报;2001年
5 解放军总医院心内科教授 智光;维护好你的心功能[N];健康时报;2004年
6 本报记者 张蕊 实习记者 朱永基;患了卒中要追查心功能[N];健康报;2011年
7 本报记者 魏鑫;专家解读对比剂肾病发病机制[N];保健时报;2009年
8 倪守东;膳食保护心功能[N];中国老年报;2001年
9 本报记者 朱国旺;黏度在对比剂肾病发生中具有重要意义[N];中国医药报;2009年
10 记者 朱国旺;特殊人群的对比剂规范使用更需关注[N];中国医药报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 李建华;川芎嗪和抗坏血酸预防鼠对比剂肾病实验研究[D];天津医科大学;2010年
2 孙小丽;MSCT中对比剂应用的基础研究[D];山东大学;2010年
3 张国福;双功能对比剂Gd-BOPTA在肝脏局灶性病变中的应用研究[D];复旦大学;2004年
4 赵英明;对比剂肾病的基础与临床研究[D];南京医科大学;2011年
5 陈伟;磁共振单克隆抗体靶向对比剂实验研究[D];第三军医大学;2001年
6 单怡;κ阿片受体在复苏大鼠心肌中的表达及其对心功能的影响[D];第二军医大学;2010年
7 陈建昌;骨髓基质细胞移植改善心肌梗死后心功能的研究[D];苏州大学;2003年
8 徐莉;肝脏3.0T质子MRS研究及钆类对比剂对波谱预扫描的影响[D];南方医科大学;2011年
9 朱艳;基于神经内分泌免疫网络的新风胶囊调控佐剂性关节炎大鼠心功能的机制研究[D];湖北中医药大学;2011年
10 王岩;骨髓间充质干细胞和微囊化施旺氏细胞移植促进心梗区治疗性血管新生和改善心功能的研究[D];山东大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 陈会娟;对比剂对不同心功能患者肾功能的影响[D];河南科技大学;2012年
2 布春青;多层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像的应用研究[D];山东中医药大学;2007年
3 任艳琴;急性心肌梗死极早期及稳定期心率变异性与心功能的关系[D];山西医科大学;2005年
4 王丹;不同浓度对比剂对16排螺旋CT冠状动脉成像的影响[D];浙江大学;2007年
5 崔磊;SPIO联合碳染料检测兔VX2肿瘤转移淋巴结的MRI实验研究[D];苏州大学;2009年
6 李建亮;自体骨髓间充质干细胞移植对急性心肌梗死后炎症反应的影响[D];苏州大学;2009年
7 颜勇;抗神经内分泌激素治疗对急性心肌梗死患者血浆神经内分泌激素水平及心功能的影响[D];中国人民解放军军医进修学院;2003年
8 冯庆芝;酒精对兔心肌损害及药物干预的实验研究[D];山东大学;2005年
9 李润英;婴幼儿肺炎并发心力衰竭时红细胞内钙浓度、cTnI变化及其与心功能的关系[D];河北医科大学;2005年
10 张云飞;高血压中医证型与血脂紊乱及心脏舒缩功能损害的相关性研究[D];成都中医药大学;2005年
本文编号:2493932
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yundongyixue/2493932.html