跳伞应激对伞兵心理情绪的影响

发布时间：2018-05-08 03:03

  本文选题：焦虑 + 应激　； 参考：《中国临床康复》2005年40期

【摘要】：目的:探讨跳伞应激对野战部队伞兵抑郁、焦虑及情绪自控能力和稳定性的影响。方法:于2004-07-06/08-14整群抽取某野战部队71名男性伞兵作为调查对象。①采用情绪自控能力量表评定调查对象的情绪自控力:由20项题目组成,每题有3个答案,分别记1、2、3分,总分40分为正常,得分越低,情绪自控越差。②采用情绪稳定性量表评定调查对象的情绪稳定性:由22项题目组成,每题有3个答案,分别记2、0、1分,总分20分为正常,得分越高,情绪稳定性越差。③采用状态—特质焦虑量表评定调查对象的焦虑状况:由两张问卷共40项描述题组成。1～20项为状态焦虑量表,主要用于评价应激情况下的状态焦虑,21～40题为特质焦虑量表,用于评定人们经常的情绪体验。④采用焦虑自评量表和抑郁自评量表测定调查对象的抑郁及焦虑程度:由20个陈述句和相应问题条目组成,均为4级评分(1～4),得分越高抑郁及焦虑程度越重。于跳伞前2d、前1个月及3次跳伞后,对调查对象进行集体情绪测验,统一指导语,测验时间约90min。组间比较采用方差分析。结果:发放问卷76份,回收71份,回收率为93%。①跳伞应激前情绪稳定性、自控能力和特质焦虑情况:跳伞应激前2d调查对象情绪稳定性评分为15.6±4.6,20分者有53人(74.6%),≥20分者有18人(25.4%);情绪自控能力评分为48.3±6.4,≤40分者有12人(16.9%),40分有59人(83.1%);跳伞应激调查对象特质焦虑评分为显著高于国内男性常模(t=3.26,P0.01)。②跳伞应激前后焦虑、抑郁情绪变化:与跳伞前1个月相比,跳伞前2d,调查对象焦虑、抑郁情绪评分及大于50分的比例显著增加(P0.01～0.05),完成3次跳伞后,焦虑、抑郁评分仍大于跳伞前1个月及前2d(P0.01～0.05),焦虑评分大于50分的比例较跳伞前2d有所降低,但仍高于跳伞前1个月,抑郁评分大于50分的比例较跳伞前1个月及前2d显著升高(P0.01)。结论:跳伞前2d,调查对象情绪不稳定、自控能力差,焦虑、抑郁情绪增加,3次跳伞完成后焦虑情绪有所降低,而抑郁情绪加重,跳伞应激对野战部队伞兵焦虑、抑郁情绪有显著的影响。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the effects of parachuting stress on depression, anxiety and emotional control ability and stability of paratroopers in field troops. Methods: a total of 71 male paratroopers from a field army were selected in a cluster from July 06, 2004 to August 14, 2004. 1 the emotional self-control ability scale was used to assess the emotional self-control ability of the subjects. The subjects were divided into 20 subjects with three answers and one score of 2,3 points. The total score of 40 was normal, and the lower the score, the worse the self-control of emotion. 2 the emotional stability scale was used to assess the emotional stability of the subjects: it was composed of 22 questions, each of which had three answers, with a score of 2 and 1, and a total score of 20 as normal. The higher the score, the worse the emotional stability. 3 the state trait anxiety scale was used to assess the anxiety status of the subjects. It is mainly used to evaluate state anxiety under stress. Used to assess people's frequent emotional experiences. 4. Self rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self rating Depression scale (SDS) were used to measure the degree of depression and anxiety in subjects: 20 declarative sentences and corresponding question items were used to measure the degree of depression and anxiety. The higher the score was, the higher the depression and anxiety were. At 2 days before parachuting, 1 month and 3 times after parachuting, the subjects were tested with collective emotion test and unified instruction, the test time was about 90 mins. ANOVA was used to compare the two groups. Results: 76 questionnaires were sent out and 71 were recovered. The recovery rate was 93.1 emotional stability before parachuting stress. Self-control ability and trait anxiety: the scores of emotional stability were 15.6 卤4.6, 74.66 and 25.4m respectively in the subjects with 20 points and 鈮，

本文编号：1859658