《中国简式明尼苏达多相人格问卷》与新兵社会适应性评价
发布时间：2018-10-23 11:44
【摘要】：目的 :探讨《中国简式明尼苏达多相人格问卷》(Chi neseAbbreviatedFormMMPI,以下简称CAF MMPI)与新兵社会适应性评价的关系 .方法 :选用MMPI的 4个效度量表和 8个临床量表 ,经修订编CAF MMPI ,对 782名新兵进行测试 ;自编《新兵社会适应性调查表》(以下简称《调查表》)对其社会适应性好坏进行评价 ,根据评价结果选出适应不良组 (n =36 )和正常组 (n =6 6 ) ,比较两组CAF MMPI测验成绩 .结果 :①同伴与上级《调查表》评价结果具有一致性 ;②除Hy外 ,适应不良组各临床量表原始分均显著高于正常组 ,包括F效度量表 ;③适应不良组各量表标准分 (≥ 6 5 )从高至低依次为F ,Sc ,Pt,Pd ,Pa和Hs.结论 :应根据本研究结果 ,采用F ,Sc ,Pt和Pa测验量表修订出新的CAF MMPI.
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the relationship between (Chi neseAbbreviatedFormMMPI, (Chinese simplified Minnesota Multiphasic Personality questionnaire) and Social adaptability Assessment of recruits. Methods: 782 recruits were tested by modified CAF MMPI, with 4 effect scales and 8 clinical scales of MMPI. The Social adaptability questionnaire of recruits (hereinafter referred to as "questionnaire") was designed to evaluate the social adaptability of recruits. According to the evaluation results, the maladjusted group (n = 36) and the normal group (n = 66) were selected to compare the scores of the two groups in CAF MMPI test. Results: (1) the evaluation results of peer and superior were consistent; (2) except Hy, the original scores of each clinical scale in the maladjusted group were significantly higher than those in the normal group, including the F effect scale; 3The standard scores of each scale (鈮，
本文编号：2289136
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the relationship between (Chi neseAbbreviatedFormMMPI, (Chinese simplified Minnesota Multiphasic Personality questionnaire) and Social adaptability Assessment of recruits. Methods: 782 recruits were tested by modified CAF MMPI, with 4 effect scales and 8 clinical scales of MMPI. The Social adaptability questionnaire of recruits (hereinafter referred to as "questionnaire") was designed to evaluate the social adaptability of recruits. According to the evaluation results, the maladjusted group (n = 36) and the normal group (n = 66) were selected to compare the scores of the two groups in CAF MMPI test. Results: (1) the evaluation results of peer and superior were consistent; (2) except Hy, the original scores of each clinical scale in the maladjusted group were significantly higher than those in the normal group, including the F effect scale; 3The standard scores of each scale (鈮，
本文编号：2289136
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yxlw/2289136.html
最近更新
教材专著
