TIP和电针对抑郁症伴失眠患者情绪及多导睡眠图特征的影响研究
本文选题:TIP + 电针 ; 参考:《中国中医科学院》2013年博士论文
【摘要】:目的 研究TIP和电针对抑郁症伴失眠患者的疗效以及相关性。 方法 将90例在中国中医科学院广安门医院心理科就诊的抑郁症伴失眠患者随机分为三组,TIP组、电针组、西药组,每组30人,观察6个月。用抑郁自评量表、焦虑自评量表、蒙哥马利抑郁量表评价抑郁疗效,用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表、多导睡眠图评价睡眠疗效。所有指标在治疗前、治疗3个月、治疗6个月评价。安全性指标采用血常规、尿常规、肝肾功能、心电图等来评价。TIP组每周治疗2次,电针组每周治疗3次,西药组服用氢溴酸西酞普兰片每天20mg-40mg。数据采用SPSS17.0软件进行统计分析。 结果 1.心理指标 1.1组间对比 治疗3个月TIP组、西药组、电针组组间对比SDS、SAS评分有显著差异,西药组优于TIP组、电针组(P0.05),电针组与TIP组对比无显著差异(p0.05); 治疗6个月TIP组、西药组、电针组组间对比SDS、SAS评分有显著差异,西药组SAS评分优于TIP组、电针组;西药组、TIP组SDS评分均优于电针组(p0.05);西药组、TIP组SDS评分无明显差异(p0.05); 治疗3个月、6个月TIP组、西药组、电针组组间对比MADRS评分均无显著差异(p0.05)。 1.2组内对比 TIP组治疗3个月后SAS、MADRS评分与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05),治疗6个月后SDS、SAS、MADRS评分与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05); 西药组、电针组治疗3个月、6个月SDS、SAS、MADRS评分与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05)。 1.3组间差值对比 治疗3个月后与治疗前SDS评分差值西药组显著优于TIP组(p0.05);SAS、MADRS评分差值无显著差异(p0.05); 治疗6个月后与治疗前TIP组、西药组、电针组SDS、SAS、MADRS评分差值无显著差异(p0.05) 2.匹兹堡睡眠质量量表 2.1组间对比 治疗3个月后PSQI量表催眠药物评分TIP组显著低于西药组(p0.05);治疗6个月后三组PSQI各项因子分均无显著差异(p0.05)。 2.2组内对比 TIP组治疗3个月后PSQI评分中睡眠质量、入睡时间、睡眠障碍、总分与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05),治疗6个月后PSQI评分中睡眠质量、入睡时间、睡眠时间、睡眠效率、睡眠障碍、日间功能、总分评分与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05); 西药组治疗3个月后PSQI评分中睡眠质量、睡眠时间、总分与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05),治疗6个月后PSQI评分中睡眠质量、睡眠时间、睡眠效率、日间功能、总分评分与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05); 电针组治疗3个月后PSQI评分中睡眠质量、入睡时间、睡眠时间、睡眠效率、催眠药物、总分与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05),治疗6个月后PSQI评分中睡眠质量、入睡时间、睡眠时间、睡眠效率、睡眠障碍、催眠药物、日间功能、总分评分与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05)。 2.3组间差值 治疗3个月后与治疗前PSQI中睡眠效率评分差值电针组显著高于TIP组(p0.05); 治疗6个月后与治疗前PSQI中睡眠效率评分差值电针组显著高于TIP组、西药组(p0.05)。 3.多导睡眠图 3.1组间比较 治疗3个月、6个月后与治疗前TIP组、西药组、电针组PSG各项因子无显著差异(p0.05) 3.2组内比较 TIP组治疗3个月后PSG中REM睡眠时间、REM期睡眠百分比、NREM睡眠百分比、NREM期潜伏期与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05),治疗6个月后PSQI评分中觉醒次数、REM睡眠时间、REM期睡眠百分比、NREM睡眠百分比与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05); 西药组治疗3个月后PSG中睡眠时间、NREM期睡眠时间、NREM潜伏期与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05),治疗6个月后PSG评分中睡眠时间、REM期次数、3+4期睡眠时间、3+4期睡眠百分比、REM期睡眠时间与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05) 电针组治疗6个月后PSG中觉醒次数与治疗前相比均有显著改善(p0.05)。 3.3组间差值 治疗3个月后TIP组治疗前PSG中REM期时间、REM期百分比差值显著高于西药组(p0.05);NREM期百分比西药组差值显著高于TIP组; 治疗6个月后TIP组治疗前PSG中REM期时间、REM期百分比差值显著高于西药组、电针组(p0.05);NREM期百分比西药组、电针组差值显著高于TIP组(p0.05) 4.心理和睡眠指标相关性分析 抑郁自评量表(SDS)与焦虑自评量表(SAS)、蒙哥马利量表(MADRS)呈显著性正相关(p0.01);蒙哥马利抑郁量表、焦虑自评量表和PSQI中睡眠障碍呈显著正相关性,和PSQI中其他项目无显著相关性;焦虑自评量表和1期睡眠时间、1期睡眠时间百分呈显著正相关,蒙哥马利抑郁量表和2期睡眠时间、2期睡眠时间百分比、REM潜伏期呈显著负相关。 治疗6个月后SDS、SAS、MADRS、PSG、PSQI和治疗前的差值相关性,结果显示PSQI中睡眠质量的改善和SDS、SAS改善呈正相关,总分的改善和SAS改善呈显著正相关;PSG中REM次数和SDS呈显著负相关,PSG中NREM百分比和SAS呈显著负相关。 结论 1.TIP治疗、西药治疗、电针治疗对抑郁症伴失眠患者的抑郁、焦虑等情绪有明显的改善作用;在治疗6个月时TIP、电针组与西药组对抑郁、焦虑的改善效果相当,在治疗3个月时西药的疗效优于TIP、电针组。 2.TIP、西药治疗、电针治疗对抑郁症伴失眠患者的睡眠结构、睡眠进程有明显的改善作用;TIP组和电针组、西药组相比REM期时间、REM期百分比显著减少,NREM期百分比显著增加。 3.抑郁自评量表与焦虑自评量表、蒙哥马利抑郁量表呈显著性正相关;蒙哥马利抑郁量表、焦虑自评量表和PSQI中睡眠障碍呈显著正相关性,和PSQI中其他项目无显著相关性;焦虑自评量表和1期睡眠时间、1期睡眠时间百分呈显著正相关,蒙哥马利抑郁量表和2期睡眠时间、2期睡眠时间百分比、REM潜伏期呈显著负相关。 4.PSQI中睡眠质量的改善和SDS、SAS改善正相关,总分的改善和SAS改善显著正相关;PSG中REM次数和SDS呈显著负相关,PSG中NREM百分比和SAS呈显著负相关。
[Abstract]:objective
Objective to study the efficacy and correlation between TIP and electroacupuncture on depressive patients with insomnia.
Method
90 cases of depression with insomnia were randomly divided into three groups: group TIP, electroacupuncture group and Western medicine group, 30 people in each group, 30 people in each group, for 6 months. The self rating depression scale, self rating anxiety scale, Montgomerie depression scale were used to evaluate the effect of depression, and the Pittsburgh sleep quality index scale and polysomnography were used. Evaluate the effect of sleep. All indexes were treated for 3 months before treatment and 6 months of treatment. Safety indexes were evaluated by blood routine, urine routine, liver and kidney function, electrocardiogram and so on to evaluate 2 times a week in group.TIP, 3 times a week in electroacupuncture group, and SPSS17.0 software for the 20mg-40mg. data of Citalopram Hydrobromide Tablets in the western medicine group. Analysis.
Result
1. psychological indicators
Comparison between the 1.1 groups
In the treatment of group TIP for 3 months, the scores of SDS and SAS in the western medicine group and the electroacupuncture group were significantly different. The western medicine group was superior to the TIP group, the electroacupuncture group (P0.05), the electroacupuncture group and the TIP group had no significant difference (P0.05).
In the treatment of group TIP for 6 months, the scores of SDS and SAS were significantly different between the western medicine group and the electroacupuncture group. The SAS score of the western medicine group was better than that of the TIP group. The SDS scores in the electroacupuncture group, the western medicine group and the TIP group were all superior to the electroacupuncture group (P0.05), and the SDS score of the western medicine group and the TIP group had no significant difference (P0.05).
For 3 months and 6 months, there was no significant difference in MADRS score between TIP group, western medicine group and EA group (P0.05).
Comparison of the 1.2 groups
After 3 months of treatment in group TIP, SAS, MADRS scores were significantly improved compared with before treatment (P0.05). After 6 months of treatment, SDS, SAS, MADRS scores were significantly improved compared with before treatment (P0.05).
Western medicine group, EA group for 3 months, 6 months SDS, SAS, MADRS score compared with before treatment were significantly improved (P0.05).
Difference comparison between 1.3 groups
After 3 months treatment, the difference between the western medicine group and the SDS group was significantly better than that of the TIP group (P0.05); the difference between SAS and MADRS score was not significant (P0.05).
After 6 months of treatment, there was no significant difference in the scores of SDS, SAS and MADRS between TIP group, western medicine group and EA group (P0.05).
2. Pittsburgh sleep quality scale
Comparison between the 2.1 groups
After 3 months of treatment, the hypnotic drug score of the PSQI scale was significantly lower in the TIP group than in the western medicine group (P0.05). After 6 months, there was no significant difference in the scores of PSQI between the three groups (P0.05).
Comparison of the 2.2 groups
After 3 months of treatment in group TIP, the quality of sleep, sleep time, sleep disorder and total score were significantly improved (P0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the quality of sleep, time of sleep, sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep disorder, daytime function and total score were significantly improved (P0.05) after 6 months of treatment (P0.05).
The quality of sleep, sleep time and total score in the PSQI score of the western medicine group were significantly improved after 3 months of treatment (P0.05). The quality of sleep, sleep time, sleep efficiency, daytime function and total score of the PSQI score were significantly improved after 6 months of treatment (P0.05).
The quality of sleep, time of sleep, sleep time, sleep efficiency, hypnotic drugs and total score were significantly improved (P0.05) in the PSQI score after 3 months of electroacupuncture treatment. The quality of sleep, time of sleep, sleep time, sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep disorders, hypnotic drugs, day function, day function, total score and treatment before treatment in the PSQI score after 6 months were treated. The comparison was significantly improved (P0.05).
Difference between 2.3 groups
The difference between the 3 months after treatment and the PSQI before treatment was significantly higher than that in the TIP group (P0.05).
After 6 months treatment, the difference of sleep efficiency score between PSQI and before treatment was significantly higher than that of TIP group, western medicine group (P0.05).
3. polysomnography
Comparison between the 3.1 groups
After treatment for 3 months, 6 months later, there was no significant difference in PSG between the TIP group, the western medicine group and the EA group (P0.05).
Internal comparison of 3.2 groups
In group TIP 3 months after treatment, the time of REM sleep in PSG, the percentage of REM sleep, the percentage of NREM sleep, and the latency of NREM phase were significantly improved (P0.05). The number of awakening, the REM sleep time, the REM sleep percentage and the NREM sleep percentage were significantly improved after 6 months of treatment (P0.05).
After 3 months of treatment in the western medicine group, the sleep time, the NREM phase sleep time, the NREM latency and the NREM latency were significantly improved (P0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the sleep time, the number of REM phase, the 3+4 phase sleep time, the 3+4 phase sleep percentage and the REM phase sleep time were significantly improved (P0.05).
After 6 months of treatment, the frequency of arousal in PSG was significantly improved compared with that before treatment (P0.05).
Difference between 3.3 groups
After 3 months of treatment, the REM period of PSG in group TIP before treatment was significantly higher than that in western medicine group (P0.05), and the difference between the western medicine group and the NREM group was significantly higher than that of the TIP group.
After 6 months of treatment, the REM period of PSG in group TIP before treatment was significantly higher than that in the western medicine group and the electroacupuncture group (P0.05), the percentage of the western medicine group in the NREM period, and the difference value of the electroacupuncture group was significantly higher than that of the TIP group (P0.05).
4. correlation analysis of psychological and sleep indexes
The self rating Depression Scale (SDS), the self rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Montgomerie scale (MADRS) showed significant positive correlation (P0.01). The Montgomerie depression scale, the self rating Anxiety Scale and the sleep disorder in PSQI had significant positive correlation, and there was no significant correlation with other items in PSQI; the self rating Anxiety Scale and the 1 phase sleep time, and the 1 phase sleep time were 100%. There was a significant positive correlation. There was a significant negative correlation between the Montgomerie depression scale and the 2 stage sleep time, the 2 period sleep time percentage and the latency period of REM.
6 months after treatment, SDS, SAS, MADRS, PSG, PSQI and the difference before treatment were correlated. The results showed that the improvement of sleep quality in PSQI was positively correlated with the improvement of SDS, SAS, and the improvement of total score was positively correlated with the improvement of SAS; REM times in PSG was negatively correlated with SDS, and there was a significant negative correlation between the percentage and the percentage of PSG.
conclusion
1.TIP treatment, western medicine treatment, electroacupuncture treatment of depression with insomnia patients with depression, anxiety and other emotions have a significant improvement. In the 6 months of treatment, TIP, electroacupuncture group and Western Medicine Group on depression, anxiety improvement effect is equivalent, in the 3 month treatment of Western medicine is better than the TIP, Electroacupuncture group.
2.TIP, western medicine treatment, electroacupuncture treatment of depression with insomnia patients sleep structure, sleep process has a significant improvement effect. TIP and electroacupuncture group, western medicine group, compared with the REM time, the percentage of REM phase decreased significantly, the percentage of NREM stage increased significantly.
3. the self rating Depression Scale was significantly positively correlated with the self rating Anxiety Scale and the Montgomerie depression scale, and the Montgomerie depression scale, the self rating Anxiety Scale and the sleep disorder in PSQI had significant positive correlation, and there was no significant correlation with other items in PSQI; the self rating Anxiety Scale and the time of sleep and sleep were significantly positively correlated with the 1 stages of sleep time. There was a significant negative correlation between the Montgomerie depression scale and the 2 stage sleep time, the 2 period sleep time percentage and the latency period of REM.
The improvement of sleep quality in 4.PSQI was positively correlated with the improvement of SDS and SAS, the improvement of total score was significantly positively correlated with the improvement of SAS; the REM times in PSG was negatively correlated with SDS, and the percentage of NREM in PSG was negatively correlated with SAS.
【学位授予单位】:中国中医科学院
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:R245
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王祖承;南达元;黄啸;;日本“第5届抑郁症学会”大会介绍[J];上海精神医学;2008年06期
2 许晓英;龚飞中;;抑郁症的药物及心理治疗策略[J];现代医药卫生;2007年23期
3 李溪;;针灸治疗56例英国人抑郁症临证分析[J];实用中医内科杂志;2008年12期
4 江平安;;中医治疗抑郁症[J];家庭医学;2006年09期
5 高建伟;倪亚平;;小柴胡汤证是治疗抑郁症的良方[J];实用中医内科杂志;2008年04期
6 张永军;;精神抑郁症治疗展望[J];中国保健;1998年10期
7 罗兰兰,张勉;抑郁症患者认知功能障碍的研究进展[J];国际精神病学杂志;2005年03期
8 迟雨岩;;父母如何面对青春期抑郁的孩子[J];健康生活;2006年12期
9 王远芳;;抑郁症的治疗及护理[J];现代临床医学;2011年04期
10 何伟谦;;治疗心脏病患者抑郁症,药物优于心理治疗[J];心血管病防治知识;2007年04期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 梁文珍;;关于抑郁症[A];玉溪市第四届精神科学术年会暨心身疾病综合治疗研讨会论文集[C];2010年
2 ;关于建立抑郁症科学防治体系的几点建议[A];2010中国科协科技工作者建议汇编[C];2010年
3 薛芬;;中药合并心理咨询对抑郁症的治疗综述[A];中国中西医结合学会精神疾病专业委员会第十届学术会议论文集[C];2010年
4 孟繁荣;;住院抑郁症患者的心理护理[A];河南省精神科护理风险管理培训班及学术交流会资料汇编[C];2011年
5 陈明远;;糖尿病与抑郁症相互关系的探讨[A];全国内科护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议、全国心脏内、外科护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议、全国第8届糖尿病护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议、全国第8届血液净化护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2010年
6 樊凌;符文彬;;抑郁症的文献及生存质量研究现状[A];广东省针灸学会第十一次学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2010年
7 范竹青;陈杰;裴音;杨婧;张捷;;中医疾病管理对抑郁症的干预模式探讨[A];中国中西医结合学会精神疾病专业委员会第十届学术会议论文集[C];2010年
8 范竹青;裴音;陈杰;杨婧;张捷;;疾病管理在抑郁症临床治疗中的研究进展[A];中国中西医结合学会精神疾病专业委员会第十届学术会议论文集[C];2010年
9 谢鸿宇;吴毅;;抑郁症的康复治疗??对大脑重塑过程的正确引导[A];中国康复医学会运动疗法分会第十一届全国康复学术大会学术会议论文摘要汇编[C];2011年
10 谭仁祥;孔令东;罗兰;;抑郁症治疗的中药研究进展[A];面向21世纪的科技进步与社会经济发展(下册)[C];1999年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 实习生 李崇寒;如何提防抑郁症的发生?[N];科技日报;2011年
2 林昊;听抑郁症患者讲40多年来遭遇[N];新华每日电讯;2010年
3 记者 李丽云;世界首台抑郁症治疗仪在哈研制成功[N];科技日报;2011年
4 本报记者 耿兴敏;马辛 驱赶抑郁症的阴霾[N];中国妇女报;2011年
5 主讲人 北京大学第六医院 王希林 胜利 北京大学人民医院 刘梅颜;学会识别焦虑和抑郁症[N];健康报;2011年
6 记者 彭溢;我省首创抑郁症治疗仪[N];黑龙江日报;2011年
7 刘向;抑郁症治疗应更为彻底[N];中国医药报;2004年
8 蒋廷玉;七成抑郁症患者意识不到自己“郁闷成疾”[N];新华日报;2005年
9 本报记者 丁华艳;花费4000元可控制抑郁症[N];华夏时报;2006年
10 庄瑜;抑郁症治疗新药度洛西汀[N];中国医药报;2004年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 林颖娜;TIP和电针对抑郁症伴失眠患者情绪及多导睡眠图特征的影响研究[D];中国中医科学院;2013年
2 桂立辉;浏阳市农村居民抑郁症流行病学研究[D];中南大学;2010年
3 杨文辉;抑郁症负性偏向的脑电生理机制研究[D];中南大学;2010年
4 黄满丽;首发抑郁症患者认知功能损害:从神经心理学测量到神经影像学研究[D];浙江大学;2012年
5 徐春燕;中药复方治疗抑郁症的临床研究[D];北京中医药大学;2013年
6 罗英姿;冗思在青少年抑郁发展中的作用及其神经机制[D];中南大学;2009年
7 段冬梅;电针抗抑郁的临床疗效及机制研究[D];北京中医药大学;2008年
8 刘丹丹;伏隔核中型多棘神经元兴奋性及海马长时程增强在抑郁症发病中的作用[D];上海交通大学;2013年
9 姜劲峰;针药结合对抑郁症模型大鼠海马神经元信号转导机制的影响及临床研究[D];南京中医药大学;2007年
10 郑照顺;抑郁症采用针刺结合心理治疗之临床疗效观察[D];广州中医药大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 闵妍;TIP和电针对抑郁症患者治疗前后心理特征和症状表现影响的研究[D];中国中医科学院;2011年
2 吕学玉;抑郁症患者五态人格与多导睡眠图特征及其相关性研究[D];中国中医科学院;2010年
3 朱晓晨;抑郁症相关失眠证候要素及虚实证候间多导睡眠图特点研究[D];北京中医药大学;2011年
4 王翠;媒介真实与现实世界的背离:国内报纸抑郁症患者形象再现研究[D];安徽大学;2010年
5 朱晓昱;三例抑郁症病例报告[D];浙江大学;2010年
6 邹琳;抑郁症与恶性肿瘤患者家属的生活质量研究[D];中国医科大学;2010年
7 黄海红;上海某三级精神病医院住院抑郁症患者经济负担的研究[D];复旦大学;2010年
8 梁毅平;社会心理因素对首发抑郁症发病及严重程度影响的研究[D];山西医科大学;2011年
9 李东雅;百事乐胶囊治疗肝气郁结型抑郁症的临床研究[D];湖南中医药大学;2011年
10 钟义松;“益肾调神”配穴法治疗抑郁症伴失眠的临床研究[D];广州中医药大学;2011年
,本文编号:2065864
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zhxiyjh/2065864.html