从范式的不可通约性看中西医学关系
发布时间：2018-07-28 15:09
【摘要】：根据美国科学哲学家托马斯·库恩的理论,中医与西医应属于相互竞争的两个不同"范式",有着完全不同的符号系统与价值标准,那么这两种医学间也不可避免地存在着"不可通约"的问题。不可通约性会引起交流困难并妨碍理性比较,在很大的程度上限制了两种医学间的相互交流与融合。因此,从理论上弥合两种医学差异的中西医结合医学,由于缺乏哲学基础的支撑,面临很大的困境。然而这却并不妨碍中西医学在各自范式内的发展与积累,甚至可以在坚持自身范式的基础上吸收与借鉴对方的精华以获得创新的灵感。而中医研究,首先应做好对传统的继承工作,进一步的创新才有可能成功。
[Abstract]:According to Thomas Kuhn, an American philosopher of science, Chinese medicine and Western medicine should belong to two competing "paradigms", with completely different symbolic systems and value standards. Then there is also an inextricable problem between these two kinds of medicine. Incomprehensibility can cause communication difficulties and hinder rational comparison, which limits the communication and fusion between the two kinds of medicine to a great extent. Therefore, the combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine, which can theoretically bridge the difference between the two kinds of medicine, is faced with great difficulties because of the lack of the support of philosophical foundation. However, this does not hinder the development and accumulation of Chinese and Western medicine in their respective paradigms, and can even absorb and draw lessons from the essence of the other party on the basis of adhering to their own paradigm in order to obtain the inspiration of innovation. Traditional Chinese medicine research, first of all, should do a good job of traditional inheritance, further innovation can be successful.
【作者单位】： 中国中医科学院中医基础理论研究所;
【分类号】：R2-031
[Abstract]:According to Thomas Kuhn, an American philosopher of science, Chinese medicine and Western medicine should belong to two competing "paradigms", with completely different symbolic systems and value standards. Then there is also an inextricable problem between these two kinds of medicine. Incomprehensibility can cause communication difficulties and hinder rational comparison, which limits the communication and fusion between the two kinds of medicine to a great extent. Therefore, the combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine, which can theoretically bridge the difference between the two kinds of medicine, is faced with great difficulties because of the lack of the support of philosophical foundation. However, this does not hinder the development and accumulation of Chinese and Western medicine in their respective paradigms, and can even absorb and draw lessons from the essence of the other party on the basis of adhering to their own paradigm in order to obtain the inspiration of innovation. Traditional Chinese medicine research, first of all, should do a good job of traditional inheritance, further innovation can be successful.
【作者单位】： 中国中医科学院中医基础理论研究所;
【分类号】：R2-031
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 李致重;论中、西医的不可通约性[J];科技导报;2001年08期
2 李致重;论中西医的不可通约性[J];中医药学刊;2001年06期
3 张玉清;杨金长;常存库;;中西医的不可通约性与可统一性[J];中医药学报;2006年03期
4 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 黄少安;黄凯南;;论演化与博弈的不可通约性[A];中国制度经济学年会论文集[C];2006年
2 张玉清;;中西医的不可通约性与可统一性[A];2006井冈山中西医结合发展研究论坛论文集[C];2006年
3 崔海灵;;实践与文化：科学哲学的现代经验[A];全国科学技术学暨科学学理论与学科建设2008年联合学术年会浙江大学论文集[C];2008年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 朱庆;“虚拟社会”与“现实社会”[N];光明日报;2001年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 党姣;从指称角度回应科学理论的不可通约性[D];昆明理工大学;2010年
2 李伟;库恩不可通约性理论的文化意义及对中国社会转型期的启示[D];燕山大学;2012年
3 贾美云;库恩不可通约性理论的比较研究[D];贵州大学;2008年
4 刘小P，
本文编号：2150642
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zhxiyjh/2150642.html
