中西医结合卒中单元与非卒中单元临床疗效比较

发布时间：2018-12-25 17:05

【摘要】：目的:比较中西医结合卒中单元与非卒中单元的临床疗效。方法:将1000例脑卒中患者随机分为两组。卒中单元组500例采用中西医结合卒中单元治疗,非卒中单元组500例按传统模式用一般治疗方法进行治疗。观察两组患者入院时及出院时卒中残障评分(按OHS评定)及生活能力评分(按Barthel评定),并最终统计两组患者死亡率。结果:入院时两组患者的OHS评分及Barthel评分相近,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。出院时两组评分均有向愈改变,但卒中单元组患者改变明显,与非卒中单元组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P0.01),卒中单元组患者死亡率低于非卒中单元组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:中西医结合卒中单元的临床疗效优于非卒中单元组,值得推广。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the clinical effect between stroke unit and non-stroke unit. Methods: 1000 patients with stroke were randomly divided into two groups. The stroke unit group (500 cases) was treated with the combination of traditional Chinese and western medicine (TCM) and the non-stroke unit group (500 cases) was treated with the general treatment method according to the traditional mode. The scores of stroke disability (OHS) and ability of life (Barthel) at admission and discharge were observed and the mortality of the two groups was calculated. Results: the OHS score and Barthel score of the two groups were similar at admission, and the difference was not statistically significant (P0.05). When discharged from hospital, the scores of both groups were significantly changed, but the patients in the stroke unit group had obvious changes, compared with the non-stroke unit group, the difference was statistically significant (P0.01). The mortality rate of the stroke unit group was lower than that of the non-stroke unit group, and the mortality rate of the stroke unit group was lower than that of the non-stroke unit group. The difference was statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion: the clinical effect of stroke unit combined with traditional Chinese and western medicine is better than that of non-stroke unit group, which is worth popularizing.
【作者单位】：广西中医学院第一附属医院神经内科;
【基金】：广西医疗卫生重点科研课题(重200639)
【分类号】：R743.3

【参考文献】