当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 肿瘤论文 >

CA125、HE4及ROMA指数在早期卵巢浆液性癌诊断中的价值探讨

发布时间:2018-03-21 07:14

  本文选题:糖链抗原125 切入点:人附睾蛋白4 出处:《新疆医科大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:目的:探讨CA125、HE4及ROMA指数在早期卵巢浆液性癌诊断中的价值。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月-2016年12月就诊于新疆肿瘤医院经病例确诊的386例卵巢疾病包括早期卵巢浆液性癌组86例I期40例,II期46例)、晚期卵巢浆液性癌组105例(III期92例,IV期13)、卵巢浆液性囊腺瘤组94例和卵巢子宫内膜异位囊组101例术前CA125和HE4血清水平及ROMA指数值,通过对各组间血清水平值、阳性率及灵敏度、特异度等指标的比较,探讨单一肿瘤标记物检测和联合检测在早期卵巢浆液性癌诊断中的价值。结果:(1)血清CA125值和HE4值及ROMA指数值在早期卵巢癌组与卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿组及卵巢浆液性囊腺瘤组中比较(均P=0.000)均P0.05,提示有助于早期卵巢浆液性癌的筛查。(2)CA125在早期卵巢癌组的阳性率(80.23%)高于ROMA指数(77.91%)和HE4(63.95%);CA125在早期卵巢癌组与卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿组的阳性率相比(2?=2.004,P=0.106),P0.05,提示尚不能认为CA125的阳性率有差异;HE4和ROMA指数在早期卵巢癌组与卵巢浆液性囊腺瘤组及卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿组的阳性率相比较(2?H E4=57.295、80.900,P=0.000、0.000;2?ROMA=91.891、67.929,P=0.000、0.000)均P0.05,差异有统计学意义。(3)HE4在卵巢浆液性癌组中的阳性率I期与II期、III期和IV期相比(2?=8.782、24.952、11.304,P=0.003、0.000、0.000)均P0.05,有统计学差异;ROMA指数在卵巢浆液性癌组中的阳性率I期与III期和IV期相比(2?=23.534、4.511,P=0.000、0.030)均P0.05,有统计学差异;CA125在卵巢浆液性癌组不同期别中的阳性率(2?=2.188,P=0.135)P0.05,提示CA125在卵巢癌组的阳性率与分期无明显相关性。(4)单一肿瘤标记物检测:HE4诊断早期卵巢癌组的特异度(95.90%)、阳性预测值(87.30%)及诊断准确度(86.12%)均高于CA125(51.28%、42.07%、60.14%)和ROMA指数(75.90%、58.77%、76.51%);ROMA指数的阴性预测值(88.62%)高于CA125(85.47%)和HE4(85.78%);R OMA指数的ROC-AUC(0.938)均大于HE4(0.908)和CA125(0.804)。(5)肿瘤标记物联合检测:CA125、HE4和ROMA指数三者均阳性时较一种或两种肿瘤标记物阳性诊断早期卵巢浆液性癌的灵敏度(53.49%vs9.30%vs11.63%)、特异度(98.46%vs98.46%vs93.85%)、阳性预测值(93.88%vs25.00%vs33.33%)、阴性预测值(82.76%vs69.31%vs69.58%)、诊断准确性(84.70%vs68.68%vs67.26%)均增高。结论:(1)CA125、HE4和ROMA指数三者均阳性时更有助于早期卵巢浆液性癌的筛查、诊断。(2)HE4和ROMA指数诊断早期卵巢浆液性癌的价值优于CA125。(3)C A125对早期浆液性卵巢癌有一定的诊断价值,更有助于临床良性疾病的鉴别诊断;(4)HE4在卵巢癌中的阳性率随卵巢癌期别的增加而升高。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the value of CA125HE4 and ROMA index in the diagnosis of early ovarian serous carcinoma. Methods: a retrospective analysis of 386 cases of ovarian diseases, including early ovarian plasma, diagnosed in Xinjiang tumor Hospital from January 2013 to December 2016, was conducted. In liquid carcinoma group, there were 86 cases of stage I, 40 cases of stage II, 46 cases of stage II, 105 cases of advanced ovarian serous carcinoma, 105 cases of stage III, 92 cases of stage IV, 94 cases of ovarian serous cystadenoma, and 101 cases of endometriosis of ovary. The serum levels of CA125 and HE4 and ROMA index were measured before operation. The serum level, positive rate, sensitivity and specificity of each group were compared. To evaluate the value of single tumor marker detection and combined detection in the diagnosis of early ovarian serous carcinoma. Results: 1) Serum CA125, HE4 and ROMA index in early ovarian cancer and ovarian endometriosis cyst and ovarian plasma. The positive rate of cystadenoma (P 0.000) was higher than that of ROMA index (77.91%), suggesting that the positive rate of CA125 in early ovarian cancer was higher than that in early ovarian cancer group (P < 0.05), suggesting that the positive rate of CA125 in early ovarian cancer group was higher than that in early ovarian cancer group and ovarian endometriosis cyst group (P < 0.05). The positive rate of CA125 in early ovarian cancer group was higher than that in early ovarian cancer group (77.91%) and that in early ovarian cancer group was higher than that in ovarian endometriosis cyst group (P < 0.05). It is suggested that there is no difference in the positive rate of CA125 between early ovarian cancer group and ovarian serous cystadenoma group and endometriosis cyst group. HE4 (57.295N) 80.900 (P0. 000 ~ 0. 000) 2? Roma 91.891n 67.929 (P 0.0000.000), the difference was significant (P 0.05). The positive rate of Ovarian serous carcinoma in stage I and II, stage III and stage IV were significantly higher than that in stage II, stage III and stage IV, respectively. The positive rate of P0.05in stage I was significantly higher than that in stage IV, and the positive rate in stage I was significantly higher than that in stage IV. The positive rate of Roma index in ovarian serous carcinoma group was significantly higher than that in III stage and stage IV. There was a significant difference in the positive rate of Roma index between stage I and stage IV of ovarian serous carcinoma (P 0.05, P 0.05, P 0.05, P < 0.01; P < 0.01; P < 0.05; P > 0.05; P > 0.05; P > 0.05; P > 0.05; P > 0.05; P > 0.05 respectively). The positive rate of CA125 in ovarian serous carcinoma group was 2? Conclusion: the positive rate of CA125 in ovarian cancer group has no significant correlation with the stage. 4) the specificity of the single tumor marker in the diagnosis of early ovarian cancer is 95.9090. (the positive predictive value is 87.30), and the diagnostic accuracy is 86.12).) it is higher than CA1251.281.2842.0742.0740.1440.14.) and the ROMA index is 75.9058.777.78.7777.51and the Roma index is 75.9058.777.75% higher than that of CA1251.281.2852.070.140.14) and the ROMA index is 75.9058.777.75% higher than that of CA12551.2852.07% (60.140.14). The negative predictive value (88.62) was higher than that of CA125 (85.47) and the ROC-AUC0. 938 (R OMA index of HE4) was higher than that of HE4 (0.908) and CA125 (0.804). 5) when the tumor markers were positive, the sensitivity of one or two tumor markers was higher than that of one or two tumor markers in the diagnosis of early ovarian serous carcinoma. 53.49vs9.30 vs 11.63m, the specificity of 98.46m is about 98.46vs93.85. the positive predictive value is 93.88vs25.00 and the negative predictive value is 82.76vs69.31vs69.58.The diagnostic accuracy is 84.70vs68.68vs67.26.Conclusion it is more helpful to screen early serous carcinoma when the positive ones are positive. The diagnostic value of HE4 and ROMA index in the diagnosis of early ovarian serous carcinoma is better than that of CA125.(3)C A125 in the diagnosis of early serous ovarian carcinoma. It is helpful for differential diagnosis of clinical benign diseases. The positive rate of PHE4 in ovarian cancer increases with the increase of other stages of ovarian cancer.
【学位授予单位】:新疆医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R737.31

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 郭东辉;郑文新;申彦;庞淑洁;;对卵巢浆液性癌的新认识[J];诊断病理学杂志;2011年04期

2 吴春;韦玮;石群立;;卵巢浆液性癌的研究进展[J];临床与实验病理学杂志;2012年10期

3 赵立武;申彦;师宜荃;刘艳;刘易欣;;P16 P53 CyclinD1在卵巢浆液性癌中的表达及意义[J];中国肿瘤临床;2012年07期

4 郑绘霞,梁建芳;P_(16)抑癌基因在卵巢浆液性癌中的表达[J];山西医科大学学报;1998年01期

5 刘丽君;杜丹丽;;卵巢浆液性癌54例临床分析[J];蚌埠医学院学报;2014年05期

6 蔡威,张淑兰;卵巢浆液性癌光镜与电镜酶细胞化学观察[J];中国实用妇科与产科杂志;2000年12期

7 佟晓光;郭科军;张颐;刘云鹏;徐惠绵;;缺氧和新生血管生成与晚期卵巢浆液性癌腹膜播散及预后相关性的研究[J];中华肿瘤防治杂志;2008年19期

8 佟晓光;张颐;刘云鹏;郭科军;;缺氧诱导因子-1α的表达与卵巢浆液性癌生物学行为的相关性[J];陕西医学杂志;2008年06期

9 韦玮;吴春;石群立;;卵巢浆液性癌发病机制的研究进展[J];诊断学理论与实践;2013年01期

10 汪向明;张帆;顾倩;马少平;;卵巢浆液性癌病理发病机制研究进展[J];中国实用妇科与产科杂志;2013年03期

相关会议论文 前2条

1 孔北华;;子宫内膜及卵巢浆液性癌发病模式[A];2011中国妇产科学术会议暨浙江省计划生育与生殖医学学术年会暨生殖健康讲习班论文汇编[C];2011年

2 王欣彦;王敏;马影;王静云;何旖旎;岳阳;高山;;KDR在卵巢浆液性癌组织中的表达及临床意义[A];中华医学会第九次全国妇科肿瘤学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年

相关博士学位论文 前5条

1 周琦;细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶16在卵巢浆液性癌细胞中的表达及其意义[D];贵州医科大学;2016年

2 相丽;卵巢浆液性癌的起源及诊断研究[D];山东大学;2013年

3 刘思伟;基于组织芯片筛选多种相关蛋白建立卵巢浆液性癌的分子分型[D];北京协和医学院;2013年

4 赵姗;TFF1与卵巢上皮性癌细胞铂类耐药关系研究及替代用药探讨[D];河北医科大学;2017年

5 张军;ARHI、WWOX和PTEN在卵巢浆液性癌发生中的作用及其与预后的关系[D];河北医科大学;2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 徐兵;卵巢浆液性癌的来源及LATS家族的表达意义[D];安徽医科大学;2015年

2 李兰芳;RNA结合蛋白eIF4G1和QKI-5在卵巢浆液性癌中的表达特点及功能[D];第三军医大学;2016年

3 马美英;CA125、HE4及ROMA指数在早期卵巢浆液性癌诊断中的价值探讨[D];新疆医科大学;2017年

4 沈旭霞;卵巢浆液性癌两级分级系统在临床病理中的应用研究[D];复旦大学;2011年

5 张洪秀;Arg-1及M2-TAM在卵巢浆液性肿瘤中的表达情况及其临床意义[D];兰州大学;2011年

6 刘阳;92例盆腔浆液性癌输卵管伞端病变观察[D];河北医科大学;2014年

7 冷小飞;卵巢浆液性癌组织中Hugl-1与aPKC的表达及意义[D];浙江大学;2010年

8 马立;BRMS1、RIZ1和SATB1在卵巢浆液性癌中的表达及其与预后的关系[D];河北医科大学;2013年

9 陈胜民;PTEN、PI3K和Akt蛋白表达与卵巢浆液性癌临床病理学的相关性研究[D];石河子大学;2011年

10 王芳;β-Catenin和E-Cadherin在卵巢浆液性癌和浆液性交界性肿瘤中的表达及意义[D];石河子大学;2011年



本文编号:1642811

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/1642811.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户01366***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com