RDW和前列腺干细胞抗原SNP对前列腺穿刺活检阳性率的影响
本文选题:红细胞分布宽度 + 前列腺肿瘤 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2016年硕士论文
【摘要】:前列腺癌(PCa)是发生于男性中的一种常见恶性肿瘤,好发于老年男性且发病隐匿,严重威胁着老年男性的身体健康。目前PCa的发病危险因素尚未明确,临床上用于诊断PCa的基本方法有前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检查、直肠指检和经直肠超声检查,而经直肠超声检查引导下的前列腺穿刺活检是PCa的诊断金标准。随着前列腺恶性肿瘤疾病筛查的普及,前列腺穿刺活检患者的数量越来越多,然而我国前列腺穿刺活检阳性率相对较低,导致了一些患者不必要的前列腺穿刺活检。因此,研究影响前列腺穿刺活检结果的相关指标,明确前列腺穿刺活检阳性的相关因素,提高前列腺穿刺活检阳性率具有极大的科研及临床意义。本研究分两个部分:第一部分我们分析了前列腺穿刺活检患者的红细胞分布宽度(RDW),比较穿刺阳性和穿刺阴性患者RDW的差异,探讨在前列腺穿刺活检患者中测定RDW的临床意义;第二部分,我们测定了前列腺穿刺活患者的前列腺干细胞抗原(PSCA)rs1045531多态性,初步研究了PSCA单核苷酸多态性(SNP)在前列腺穿刺活检患者中的临床意义。第一部分前列腺穿刺活检患者中红细胞分布宽度测定的临床意义目的:探讨红细胞分布宽度(RDW)在前列腺穿刺活检患者中的临床意义。方法:分析比较前列腺穿刺活检患者穿刺病理结果为前列腺癌(PCa)和良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者间RDW、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、血红蛋白(HB)、血白细胞(WBC)、血小板(PLT)、甘油三酯(TG)和年龄的差异,Logistic回归分析RDW、PSA、HB和年龄对前列腺穿刺阳性的影响。运用受试者工作特性(ROC)曲线分析比较RDW在不同PSA时对前列腺穿刺阳性的影响。运用方差分析和Spearman等级相关分析来分析比较RDW与PCa患者PSA、Gleason评分及临床分期的关系。依据2002 AJCC TNM classification将早期PCa(≤T2N0M0)患者筛选出,剔除中晚期PCa患者,重新对RDW与穿刺阳性关系进行统计学分析,本研究中早期PCa特指临床局限性PCa。结果:PCa患者RDW[(13.38±1.11)%,359例]高于BPH患者[(12.75±0.62)%,434例],差异有统计学显著意义(P0.001),RDW是前列腺穿刺阳性的独立影响因素,明显优于年龄和PSA(OR值分别为2.440、1.061和1.017)。PSA20ng/ml组患者ROC曲线下面积(AUCRDW)明显高于PSA10ng/ml组和PSA(10~20ng/ml)组,三组的AUCRDW分别为0.730(P0.05)、0.560(P0.05)和0.639(P0.05)。PCa患者不同PSA组、Gleason评分组及临床分期之间的RDW差异分别都具有统计学意义(P0.05),并且随着疾病危险度越高,RDW值越大。并进一步行RDW与早期PCa的Logistic回归分析,结果显示RDW作为早期PCa的独立影响因素,OR值达到最高的2.547(P0.001)。结论:1、RDW在PCa患者中高于BPH患者,RDW是前列腺穿刺阳性的独立影响因子。2、RDW可用于预测前列腺穿刺阳性,尤其是PSA20ng/ml的穿刺患者。3、RDW分别与PSA、Gleason评分及临床分期都呈正相关,可用于评估PCa危险程度。4、RDW判断早期PCa时OR值最高,对临床上PCa的早发现具有重要意义。第二部分前列腺穿刺活检患者中前列腺干细胞抗原SNP的初步研究目的:研究前列腺穿刺活检患者中前列腺干细胞抗原(PSCA)基因单核苷酸多态性(SNP)与前列腺癌(PCa)的相关性。方法:分析研究前列腺穿刺活检患者的PSCA rs1045531的多态性,比较PCa和良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者间rs1045531基因型分布频率的差异,并分析该基因多态性与穿刺患者年龄、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和Gleason评分的相关性。结果:PCa组(67例)与BPH组(77例)患者的PSCA rs1045531基因型分布频率差异具有统计学意义(P=0.036)。与CC型基因相比,AC型基因显著增加PCa的患病风险(OR=2.383,95%CI=1.198-4.741,P=0.013)。进一步分析rs1045531基因多态性与穿刺患者年龄、PSA和Gleason评分的关系,分析结果显示在所有前列腺穿刺活检患者中rs1045531 AC型患者PSA(53.49±29.24ng/ml)明显高于CC型(22.42±18.74ng/ml)(P=0.019);在PCa患者中AC型患者PSA(69.89±53.00ng/ml)也明显高于CC型的PSA(24.40±11.73ng/ml)(P=0.025)。结论:PSCA rs1045531 AC型基因与PCa的发病风险相关,且与前列腺穿刺活检患者的PSA相关,可用于PCa的发病预测和预后评估。
[Abstract]:Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common malignant tumor occurring in men. It occurs in old men and is concealed. It is a serious threat to the health of old men. The risk factors of PCa are not clear. The basic methods used for diagnosis of PCa are prostate specific antigen (PSA), rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound The prostate biopsy guided by rectal ultrasound is the diagnostic gold standard for PCa. With the prevalence of prostate cancer screening, the number of patients with prostate biopsy is increasing, but the positive rate of prostate biopsy in our country is relatively low, leading to unnecessary prostate biopsy in some patients. Therefore, it is of great scientific and clinical significance to study the related factors affecting the results of prostate biopsy, to clarify the related factors of positive prostate biopsy and to improve the positive rate of prostate biopsy. This study is divided into two parts: in the first part, we analyzed the red cell distribution width (RDW) of the prostate biopsy patients, and compared the results. The difference in RDW between positive puncture and puncture negative patients was discussed. The clinical significance of measuring RDW in prostate biopsy patients was discussed. The second part, we measured the prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) rs1045531 polymorphism of prostate biopsy patients, and preliminarily studied the presence of PSCA monoside polymorphism (SNP) in prostate biopsy patients. Clinical significance of the measurement of red cell distribution width in the first part of the prostate biopsy: the clinical significance of the red cell distribution width (RDW) in the patients with prostate biopsy. Methods: analysis and comparison of the pathological results of prostate biopsy patients for prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) RDW, prostate specific antigen (PSA), hemoglobin (HB), blood leukocyte (WBC), platelets (PLT), triglyceride (TG) and age differences. Logistic regression analysis of the effects of RDW, PSA, HB and age on prostatic puncture positive effects. The effects of RDW on prostate biopsy positive effects were compared with the subjects' working characteristics (ROC) curve. The relationship between RDW and PCa patients' PSA, Gleason score and clinical staging was analyzed by variance analysis and Spearman grade correlation analysis. According to 2002 AJCC TNM classification, the early PCa (< < < < T2N0M0) patients were screened out and the middle and late PCa patients were eliminated, and the relationship between RDW and puncture positive was statistically analyzed. The results of clinical limited PCa.: RDW[(13.38 + 1.11)% of PCa patients, 359 Cases, higher than BPH patients [(12.75 + 0.62)%, 434], the difference was statistically significant (P0.001), RDW was an independent influence factor of prostate biopsy positive, obviously superior to age and PSA (OR value respectively 2.440,1.061 and 1.017).PSA20ng/ml group under ROC curve area (AUCRDW) Ming Compared with group PSA10ng/ml and PSA (10~20ng/ml), AUCRDW in three groups was 0.730 (P0.05), 0.560 (P0.05) and 0.639 (P0.05).PCa were in different PSA groups. The RDW difference between the Gleason score group and the clinical stage was statistically significant (P0.05), and the higher the risk of the disease, the greater the value. Ogistic regression analysis showed that RDW was the independent influence factor of early PCa, and the OR value reached the highest 2.547 (P0.001). Conclusion: 1, RDW is higher in PCa patients than those of BPH, RDW is an independent influence factor of prostate puncture positive factor.2, RDW can be used to predict prostatic puncture positive, especially for PSA20ng/ml puncture patients. N score and clinical staging are positive correlation, can be used to evaluate the risk of PCa.4, RDW is the highest at early PCa, and it is of great significance for the early detection of PCa in clinical. Second preliminary study of prostate stem cell antigen SNP in prostate biopsy patients: the study of prostate stem cell resistance in prostate biopsy patients. The correlation between the original (PSCA) gene single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: analyze the polymorphism of PSCA rs1045531 in prostate biopsy patients and compare the difference in the frequency of rs1045531 genotype distribution between PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients, and analyze the polymorphism of the gene and the age of the puncture patient and the prostate special. Correlation between heterosexual antigen (PSA) and Gleason score. Results: the difference in the distribution frequency of PSCA rs1045531 genotypes in group PCa (67 cases) and BPH group (77 cases) was statistically significant (P=0.036). Compared with CC gene, the AC type gene significantly increased the risk of PCa (OR= 2.383,95%CI=1.198-4.741,). The relationship between sex and age, PSA and Gleason scores, the results showed that in all patients with rs1045531 AC, PSA (53.49 + 29.24ng/ml) was significantly higher than that of the CC type (22.42 + 18.74ng/ml) (P=0.019), and PSA (69.89 +, 24.40) was significantly higher in PCa patients. 25). Conclusion: the PSCA rs1045531 AC gene is associated with the risk of PCa and is associated with the PSA of prostate biopsy patients, and can be used to predict the incidence and prognosis of PCa.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R737.25
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李勇;;前列腺穿刺标本35例诊断分析[J];辽宁医学杂志;2009年03期
2 杨飞;周祥福;;前列腺穿刺方法研究进展[J];中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版);2009年06期
3 李琦;王智勇;齐艳;尚攀攀;乔保平;张卫星;魏金星;;单中心331例前列腺穿刺患者临床特征分析[J];中国医药科学;2013年14期
4 杨关天,杨建军;前列腺穿刺活检术研究进展[J];国外医学(肿瘤学分册);2004年03期
5 童仕俊;姜昊文;杨宝年;熊祖泉;张元芳;;改良前列腺穿刺活组织检查技术的临床应用[J];中国全科医学;2006年16期
6 张文广;程惠安;温小明;汤平;;影响前列腺穿刺活检阳性率的临床因素分析[J];实用医学杂志;2007年05期
7 姜伟,杨世梅,李加平,闵立贵,王英刚,罗勇;介入性超声前列腺穿刺活检术66例临床观察[J];中国误诊学杂志;2005年11期
8 马志方;王东文;;前列腺穿刺活检术[J];现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志;2012年01期
9 韩涛;杨荣;郭宏骞;;针对肿瘤一侧性的前列腺穿刺与根治切除病理诊断相关性研究[J];医学研究生学报;2013年04期
10 何立斌,崔应东,刘国敏,王浩强,莫国新;前列腺穿刺定位装置的设计与使用[J];中国肿瘤;2003年05期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 邹依珩;洪斌;赵正平;郭剑明;王国民;;300例前列腺穿刺病例总结[A];第十五届全国泌尿外科学术会议论文集[C];2008年
2 齐艳;;无痛前列腺穿刺的护理体会[A];2013年河南省腔镜护理管理新技术新业务研讨班论文集[C];2013年
3 赵会平;;无痛前列腺穿刺活检术在临床应用中的护理体会[A];2012年河南省外科创伤及灾难救治专科知识学术会议论文集[C];2012年
4 张维珍;毛依芬;朱缀芳;苗英;;直视下前列腺穿刺活检术的护理配合[A];第十五届全国泌尿外科学术会议论文集[C];2008年
5 王靖宇;王东文;曹晓明;程伟;;超声引导下前列腺穿刺有必要制定操作规程吗?[A];第十五届全国泌尿外科学术会议论文集[C];2008年
6 许小英;王薇;;稀碘伏灌肠在前列腺穿刺活检术中的疗效与护理[A];第十五届全国泌尿外科学术会议论文集[C];2008年
7 许晓明;方登攀;邬佳波;陈炳;吴海如;;直视下前列腺穿刺活检术的应用[A];2009年浙江省男科、泌尿外科学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年
8 徐煜;;BMI与前列腺穿刺结果的关系[A];第十五届全国泌尿外科学术会议论文集[C];2008年
9 郑宁;方滔;刘志聪;;超声引导下无痛前列腺穿刺活检术[A];2011年浙江省超声医学学术年会论文汇编[C];2011年
10 魏霞;唐亚琼;;经直肠超声引导8点前列腺穿刺活检术的护理体会[A];第十五届全国泌尿外科学术会议论文集[C];2008年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 李鸣;我国的PSA标准设在哪?[N];健康报;2006年
2 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院副院长、泌尿外科主任 叶定伟;有可疑症状赶紧查[N];健康时报;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 吴亦硕;前列腺穿刺人群的相关研究以及染料木黄酮在该人群中的初步研究[D];复旦大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 麦智鹏;基于经会阴穿刺与大体病理相比较的前列腺癌病灶空间分布研究[D];北京协和医学院;2015年
2 杨先悦;SWE在前列腺穿刺中的应用研究及“6+X”针穿刺中6针的价值分析[D];安徽医科大学;2016年
3 袁博;不同PSA区间前列腺穿刺活检阳性率的比较[D];吉林大学;2016年
4 王力;四种预测前列腺穿刺阳性风险模型准确性的外部验证与比较[D];苏州大学;2016年
5 顾宇伟;前列腺穿刺患者血清IL-35水平测定及分析[D];苏州大学;2016年
6 胡秦;RDW和前列腺干细胞抗原SNP对前列腺穿刺活检阳性率的影响[D];苏州大学;2016年
7 熊飞龙;血清PSA值在前列腺穿刺患者中的临床意义[D];重庆医科大学;2016年
8 王振华;前列腺特异抗原水平与直肠超声引导无痛前列腺穿刺结果和临床指标的相关性分析[D];郑州大学;2011年
9 周进;50岁以下前列腺穿刺73例临床病理分析[D];浙江大学;2014年
10 车广亮;前列腺特异抗原与酸性磷酸酶在前列腺穿刺前临床研究[D];新疆医科大学;2011年
,本文编号:1911777
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/1911777.html