线型闭合器在喉癌全喉切除术中的使用
发布时间:2018-07-07 15:17
本文选题:全喉切除术 + 线型闭合器 ; 参考:《广西医科大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的:比较喉癌全喉切除术中线性闭合器和手工缝合关闭咽腔的疗效。方法:回顾性收集2014.12-2017.03在我院行全喉切除术中使用线型闭合器关闭咽腔共23例,其中使用密闭式技术17例,开放式技术6例。同时收集同术者于2010.01-2014.12月在我院行全喉切除术手工缝合咽腔23例(对照组)。对比分析两种方法的一般资料、手术时间、咽瘘发生率、经口进食时间、术后至出院时间及术后除咽瘘外并发症的差异,探讨线型闭合器的临床效果。结果:闭合器的密闭式技术组与手工组相比能够明显缩短手术时间,平均缩短141.12分钟;缩短术后经口进食时间(4.42天)以及术后至出院时间(4.75天)。闭合器的开放式技术与手工组相比明显可以缩短手术时间,但术后经口进食时间、术后住院时间及咽瘘发生率没有差异。密闭式技术组没有咽瘘发生,但与对照组相比(26.09%),P=0.0660.05,统计学无显著差异。闭合器组并不增加除咽瘘外其他并发症的发生率。结论:在喉恶性肿瘤全喉切除术中使用线型闭合器的密闭式技术关闭咽腔优于传统手工缝合技术。
[Abstract]:Objective: To compare the efficacy of linear closure and manual suture in laryngectomy for closing the pharyngeal cavity. Methods: a total of 23 cases of 2014.12-2017.03 were collected in our hospital for closing the pharynx with a linear closure device, including 17 cases of closed technique and 6 open technique. At the same time, the same operator was collected at 2010.01-2014.12 month in my hospital. 23 cases (control group) were sutured by total laryngectomy. The general data of the two methods, the time of operation, the incidence of pharynx fistula, the time of oral feeding, the time after the operation and the difference of the postoperative complications after the operation of the pharynx fistula were discussed. Results: the closed technique group was compared with the manual group. It could shorten the operation time, shorten the average time of 141.12 minutes, shorten the time of eating after the operation (4.42 days) and after the operation to discharge time (4.75 days). The open technique of the closed device can shorten the operation time obviously compared with the manual group, but the time of eating after the operation, the time of hospitalization after the operation and the incidence of pharynx fistula are not different. There was no fistula in the operation group, but there was no significant difference between the control group (26.09%) and P=0.0660.05. The closure group did not increase the incidence of other complications except for the pharyngopharynx fistula. Conclusion: the closed closure technique of the linear closure in the laryngectomy for laryngeal malignant tumor is superior to the traditional manual suture technique.
【学位授予单位】:广西医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R739.65
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 王亮;王卫卫;娄卫华;;吻合器全喉切除术与传统方法全喉切除术的临床对比观察[J];临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志;2015年11期
2 林建英;杨熙鸿;郭海鹏;陈伟正;彭汉伟;;闭合器和手工缝合在喉癌切除术后喉咽关闭中的比较[J];中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科;2015年01期
3 魏小栋;;食管癌手术中吻合器的临床应用研究进展[J];湖北民族学院学报(医学版);2013年04期
4 陈凛;边识博;;胃肠外科吻合器应用相关并发症及其处理[J];中国实用外科杂志;2013年04期
5 胡晶;沈金芳;吴斌;;恶性肿瘤手术患者全身麻醉的最小成本分析[J];中国药房;2012年34期
6 刘学奎;李浩;刘巍巍;李秋梨;李铨;张欣睿;张星;郭朱明;曾宗渊;;线型闭合器在喉全切除术中的应用[J];中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志;2012年07期
7 李继翔;李健宁;甄亚男;;我国中下段直肠癌双吻合器吻合术后并发症荟萃分析[J];肿瘤基础与临床;2010年01期
8 朱立新,汪广平;全喉切除术后并发咽瘘的相关因素分析与防治[J];临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志;1993年03期
,本文编号:2105362
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2105362.html