结直肠癌中EMT标志物的表达对预后的意义以及IGFBP-rP1在EMT和转移中的作用及机制研究
[Abstract]:Colorectal cancer is one of the major malignant tumors in today's society. Its incidence and mortality rate are located in third and fourth of the world's malignant tumors. There are about 1400000 newly diagnosed cases of colorectal cancer in the world each year, and about 693900 patients die of colorectal cancer. Western life has caused a rapid increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer in China. According to <2015 China cancer statistics, 376300 cases of colorectal cancer were newly confirmed in China in 2015, and 191000 patients died of colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer has seriously threatened the health of the people all over the world, causing serious social and economic burdens in.TNM staging. To assess the overall prognosis and guide standardized treatment, but it has not been able to meet the needs of individualized treatment. Most patients in phase II and stage III have not benefited from the treatment guided by TNM staging. Therefore, effective molecular markers related to prognosis and treatment are excavated to assist in the screening of early stages of the risk of metastasis or recurrence. Colorectal cancer patients have an important clinical value to benefit from subsequent adjuvant therapy. Moreover, it is imperative to actively carry out the study of the pathological mechanism of colorectal cancer for the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer. More than 90% of the patients with malignant tumors eventually died of tumor metastasis or relapse. About 20% of the patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Distant metastasis has occurred. Patients with 40-50% have not found metastasis at the time of diagnosis, and distant metastasis will eventually occur. Tumor metastasis is a multistep, multi stage, multi pathway, and a series of complex processes involving multiple gene changes. In recent years, more and more studies have shown that epithelial mesenchymal transition (Epithelial mesenchymal transi) Tion, EMT) plays an important role in the invasion and metastasis of tumor, which refers to the biological process of epithelial cells transformed into interstitial phenotypes after external stimuli are stimulated by external signals. In this process, the epithelial cells lose their polarity, lose the close adhesion of the cells, and the expression of epithelial markers is downregulated or missing, and gradually acquired between the epithelial cells. The most significant molecular event in.EMT process is the decrease of E-cadherin expression, while the expression of N-cadherin, Vimentin and Fibronectin is enhanced, and some transcription factors such as Snail, Slug, Twist and Zeb1/2 are directly or indirectly regulated by the E-cadher. The expression of EMT related genes, such as in, induces the EMT process. Therefore, we detect the expression of these classical EMT related markers in colorectal cancer, and make clear the role of these markers in the prognosis of colorectal cancer, and try to select the key molecules to select the group with high metastasis risk, to judge the prognosis of the patients, to transfer the prediction, and to predict the prognosis of the patients. There are many important signaling pathways in the.EMT process, including TGF- beta, RTK, Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog, Matrix and anoxia, including TGF- beta 1, which is a classic factor to stimulate tumor cells to construct EMT models in vitro. The present report on TGF-P signaling pathway involved in EMT is quite detailed, TGF- beta After binding to its receptor, it activates Smad2/3 to phosphorylate it, then the phosphorylated Smad2/3 combines with Smad4 into the nucleus to regulate a series of functions associated with metastasis and EMT related target genes. In addition, the process of TGF- beta induced EMT involves some other signaling pathways related to cell movement and apoptosis, such as the PI3K/Akt pathway, MAPK pathway and Rho-like GTPase. In addition to the classic EMT markers, more and more reports reveal that many new molecules play an important role in the EMT process, and the insulin like growth factor binding protein related protein 1 (insulin-like growth factor binding protein-related protein 1, IGFBP-rP1) is our laboratory through inhibitory subtraction A gene expressed in colon adenocarcinoma cDNA library from colon adenocarcinoma normal mucosa and in colorectal adenocarcinoma. A series of previous studies found that IGFBP-rP1 inhibits the growth of colorectal cancer cells, induces apoptosis and senescence, and the higher the expression, the better the prognosis of the patients. We believe that it plays a potential inhibition in colorectal cancer. In addition, in the early laboratory in vitro cell line study found that IGFBP-rP1 could play an inhibitory role in the EMT process. Therefore, we would like to identify the relationship between IGFBP-rP1 and EMT and metastasis in colorectal cancer both in vivo and in vitro. Although there are some reports on the ability of IGFBP-rP1 to inhibit tumor cell migration, the specific machine It is not clear that.IGFBP-rP1 can be combined with IGFs and insulin, but the ability to bind is weak, which suggests that IGFBP-rP1 is independent of IGF in addition to the classical IGF system. Our early lab chip data found that IGFBP-rP1 overexpression causes the downstream effector of TGF- beta pathway S The expression level of Mad3 mRNA is reduced. Therefore, whether or not IGFBP-rP1 plays the function of inhibiting EMT through the TGF- beta /Smad signaling pathway is worthy of our in-depth study. First, we selected the cDNA specimens of the cancer tissues of 346 colorectal cancer patients who were treated in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital for 2004-2008 years, and used real time fluorescent quantitative PCR (qPCR) to detect eight EMT markers. The expression of substance, including E-cadherin, Vimentin, Fibronectin, Snail, Slug, Twist, Zeb1 and Zeb2., had 167 patients' prognosis information. Follow-up information was obtained by telephone follow-up. The follow-up time was up to September 30, 2013, the shortest follow-up time was 3 months, the longest period was 115 months, the median follow-up time was 72 months, and the average follow-up time was 68 months. Then we followed up the results of mRNA in the tissue microarray specimens preserved in another group of laboratory tests, using immunohistochemical methods to detect the expression of E-cadherin, Fibronectin, Snail, Slug and Twist. This group of cases came from 415 colorectal cancer, which was treated at the first people's Hospital in Hangzhou, Hangzhou. All the patients' cancer tissue specimens were provided with the patient's prognosis information. The follow-up information was provided by the Xiaoshan CDC. The follow-up time was up to December 31, 2006, the shortest 1 months, the longest 186 months, the median follow-up time of 33 months, the average follow-up time of 48 months.SPSS 20 for windows statistics software for the following statistical processing. M Ann-Whitney rank sum test calculated the difference in the expression of gene in different clinical phenotypes; the expression difference of transcription factors in two phenotypes was calculated by non paired t test; the correlation analysis of protein expression grouping results and clinical manifestations was determined by chi square test or Fisher accurate test; two the correlation analysis of the subgroups used Spearman bivariate analysis. Correlation analysis; single factor Cox proportional risk model for single factor survival analysis of continuous variables; Kaplan-Meier method for single factor survival analysis (log-rank method for significant test) and mapping of survival curves; single factor analysis was used for multiple factor survival analysis for prognostic factors. The above analysis took P value less than 0.05 as a significant threshold. In the two groups of colorectal cancer samples, the relationship between the EMT markers and the clinicopathological parameters and prognosis was analyzed at the level of nRNA and protein at two levels. First, at the level of mRNA, the difference between the EMT markers in different clinical phenotypes was found, and the transcription factors were in the stromal table. The expression in patients with type (Vim/E-cad or Fibro/E-cad seventy-fifth percentile) was often higher than the epithelial phenotype (Vim/E-cad or Fibro/E-cad seventy-fifth percentile); five transcription factor 22 had a positive correlation; in a number of EMT markers, the high expression of Snail was an adverse factor for the patient and was an independent factor. Prognostic indicators; further in the subsistence analysis after stratified TNM staging, the high expression of Snail was an unfavorable independent prognostic indicator in stage I - II patients. In addition to the high expression of Slug or Twist, the prognosis of stage I - II patients was also poor, but these two were not independent preconditioning factors. Based on the mRNA level, we selected five EMT markers (E-cadherin, Fibronectin, Snail, Slug and Twist) were tested for subsequent protein levels. The results of protein levels were generally consistent with the results of mRNA levels, but some new findings were found to be poor in the positive expression of.Snail or Twist nuclei; the joint analysis of Snail or Twist and E-cadherin showed that, Herin low expression and Snail positive or E-cadherin low expression and Twist positive patients have the lowest survival rate; and Snail nuclear positive expression is an unfavorable independent prognostic indicator. Further more detailed analysis found that the prognostic significance of Snail or Twist nuclear positive only lies in stage I - II patients, in stage III - IV patients, There is no significant difference in survival between the presence of Snail or Twist nuclear positive; similarly, the positive expression of Snail nuclear positive is also of independent prognostic significance in stage I - II patients; furthermore, we also found that the effect of Snail on the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients depends on the state of p53, and that the positive expression of Snail is negative only in the p53 wild type patients. In the early stage of survival. In our early colorectal cancer cell line, we found that IGFBP-rP1 can downregulate the expression of epithelial markers, reduce the cell migration and invasion, and play an inhibitory role in the EMT process. Therefore, we would like to define the relationship between IGFBP-rP1 and EMT and metastasis in the body level. First, we detected the expression of IGFBP-rP1 in 217 cases of colorectal cancer by immunohistochemical method. Through chi square test, we found that the high expression of IGFBP-rP1 was negatively correlated with the histological grade, local lymph node recidivism and pathological stage, and was positively correlated with the expression of the EMT marker E-cadherin and P-catenin membrane, and the interstitial marker Fib. The expression of ronectin was negatively correlated. At the tissue level, it was further clarified that IGFBP-rP1 played a role in inhibiting EMT in colorectal cancer. Then, the subcutaneous tumor test in nude mice revealed the inhibition of the growth of SW620 in the colorectal cancer cells after overexpression of IGFBP-rP1, and the expression of IGFBP-rP1 was also detected in the transplanted tumor. The expression of the epithelial markers and the inhibition of the expression of the interstitial markers and the opposite effect in the IGFBP-rP1 knockout SW480 further indicate that IGFBP-rP1 inhibits the EMT process in colorectal cancer. In order to clarify the effect of IGFBP-rP1 on metastasis in the body, we pass the tail vein over expression and knockout IGFBP-rP1 two The model of lung metastasis constructed by the group cell line reveals that the presence of IGFBP-rP1 inhibits the lung metastasis of colorectal cancer cells from positive and negative two aspects. Then we further explore the mechanism of IGFBP-rP1 to regulate the occurrence of EMT in colorectal cancer. First, it is found that endogenous IGFBP-rP1 can inhibit the TGF- beta in the cell line in vitro. The expression of the body and its downstream molecule Smad inhibits the activation of the TGF- beta /Smad signaling pathway. Then the EMT phenomenon induced by the knockout of IGFBP-rP1 is reversed by adding the TGF- beta receptor inhibitor SB431542 in the SW480 knockout IGFBP-rP1 cell line. This further proves that the TGF- beta / Smad signaling pathway is necessary for IGFBP-rP1 to participate in the regulation and control of the IGFBP-rP1. Finally, in the EMT model induced by TGF- beta 1 stimulated HT29 cells, the addition of exogenous recombinant protein IGFBP-rP1 not only reverses the induced EMT phenomenon, but also inhibits and inhibits the activation of TGF- beta receptor and downregulates the phosphorylation level of Smad2/3, which is again verified that IGFBP-rP1 is suppressed by the negative regulation of TGF- beta /Smad signaling pathway. In the EMT process, we can conclude that (1) the effect of Snail on the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients depends on the state of p53. Only in the p53 wild type patients, Snail expression has a bad prognostic significance, and the high expression of Snail in patients with stage I and II of colorectal cancer is an unfavorable independent prognostic factor or Snail Yang. Sex is an independent risk factor. (2) IGFBP-rP1 inhibits EMT and metastasis of colorectal cancer through TGF- beta /Smad signaling pathway.
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R735.34
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王汉涛 ,Kraemer M.;随访危险因素分析:复发和非复发结直肠癌的比较[J];中国实用外科杂志;2001年12期
2 苏森;患结直肠癌妇女后代癌症的危险性增加[J];中国肿瘤;2001年06期
3 汪一虹;在确定的法国人群中年龄<45岁结直肠癌病人与≥45岁结直肠癌病人的比较[J];国外医学(消化系疾病分册);2002年01期
4 李会晨;结直肠癌解剖位置的连续性右向迁移[J];国外医学.外科学分册;2003年03期
5 李志霞;结直肠癌复发及转移的综合治疗[J];中华胃肠外科杂志;2003年06期
6 何建苗,蒲永东,曹志宇,刘卫平;老年人结直肠癌186例的外科治疗[J];中华胃肠外科杂志;2003年05期
7 保红平,方登华,高瑞岗,李奎,张雪松,刘天锡;青年人结直肠癌临床病理分析[J];中国普外基础与临床杂志;2004年01期
8 章江;;监测结直肠癌非常必要[J];国外医学情报;2004年04期
9 郜文秀,杨艳芳,梁小波,李耀平,李佩珍;细胞粘附分子变异体在结直肠癌中的表达及预后[J];中国公共卫生;2005年07期
10 Nozawa T. ,Enomoto T. ,Koshida Y. ,M. Kuranami,王志宇;人结直肠癌黏膜下血小板源性内皮细胞生长因子特异性增强表达[J];世界核心医学期刊文摘(胃肠病学分册);2005年06期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 郑树;;结直肠癌预后与转移相关因素分析[A];2005年浙江省肿瘤学术会议全国大肠癌转移与复发的诊治研讨会学术论文集[C];2005年
2 邹一峰;吴小剑;兰平;;结直肠癌免疫治疗新进展[A];第十一次全国中西医结合大肠肛门病学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
3 郁宝铭;;结直肠癌治疗的进展及其新理念[A];2006年浙江省肛肠外科学术年会论文汇编[C];2006年
4 王锡山;;结直肠癌治疗的困惑之我见[A];第九届全国肿瘤转移学术大会暨2011年黑龙江省医学会肿瘤学年会报告集[C];2011年
5 秦建平;;未病思想中的结直肠癌预防[A];贵州省中西医结合学会肛肠学会第五届学术交流会暨新技术新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2012年
6 高文庆;陈会林;童蕾;陆松春;;老年梗阻性结直肠癌诊疗体会(附42例报告)[A];首届“之江中医药论坛”暨浙江省中医药学会2011年学术年会论文集[C];2011年
7 王启远;周长江;高云飞;徐岩;李坤;;血管内皮生长因子与结直肠癌[A];《中华急诊医学杂志》第八届组稿会暨急诊医学首届青年论坛论文汇编[C];2009年
8 巴一;;结直肠癌靶向治疗进展[A];第三届中国肿瘤内科大会教育集暨论文集[C];2009年
9 何超;朱洪波;;结直肠癌的生物治疗[A];2009年浙江省肿瘤外科学术年会暨肿瘤外科规范化诊治学习班论文汇编[C];2009年
10 万德森;;进一步提高结直肠癌疗效的思考[A];2009年浙江省肿瘤学术年会暨肿瘤诊治新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 中华医学会肿瘤学分会主任委员 顾晋;分期不精确 致结直肠癌过度治疗[N];健康报;2012年
2 本报记者 贾岩;跨线治疗成结直肠癌最后防线[N];医药经济报;2012年
3 本报记者 贾岩;跨线治疗构筑结直肠癌最后防线[N];医药经济报;2012年
4 本报记者 林琳;结直肠癌:可以治愈的癌症[N];医药经济报;2013年
5 记者 张妍 通讯员 熊静帆 朱品磊;深圳结直肠癌发病高于全国[N];深圳商报;2013年
6 本报记者 孙刚;预防结直肠癌:请管住嘴[N];解放日报;2013年
7 上海市中医医院肿瘤科 侯凤刚 副主任医师;中医药在结直肠癌治疗中的作用和特色[N];上海中医药报;2014年
8 李华虹 孙瑜淼 记者 李丽云 实习生 阴浩;专家呼吁:结直肠癌应多学科规范化诊疗[N];科技日报;2014年
9 ;降低结直肠癌复发有新疗法[N];人民日报;2003年
10 韩自力;新化疗方案可高效治疗结直肠癌[N];健康报;2007年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 陈涛;MicroRNA-31/FIH-1调控关系在结直肠癌发生发展中的作用及其机制研究[D];复旦大学;2014年
2 任翡;MYBL2基因在结直肠癌的表达及机制的初步探讨[D];复旦大学;2014年
3 吴朋;结直肠癌中microRNA-615基因甲基化及其生物学特性探究[D];复旦大学;2014年
4 李泽武;MicroRNA-203靶向ZNF217基因调控结直肠癌生物学行为的研究[D];山东大学;2015年
5 徐兴远;低分子肝素对结直肠癌患者预后的影响及相关机制的研究[D];复旦大学;2014年
6 梁洪亮;miR-454在结直肠癌中的功能及其作用机制[D];山东大学;2015年
7 金鹏;MMR蛋白在雌激素致结肠癌细胞凋亡中的作用及SEPT9检测结直肠癌的研究[D];第三军医大学;2015年
8 珠珠;云南省Lynch综合征候选基因标志物研究[D];昆明医科大学;2014年
9 周智航;SEMA3F通过下调ASCL2-CXCR4轴而抑制结直肠癌转移的分子机制[D];第三军医大学;2015年
10 王林;MiRNA-300对结直肠癌肿瘤侵袭和增殖的影响及其调控机制的初步研究[D];第三军医大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 颜斐斐;术后结直肠癌患者癌因性疲乏与影响因素的研究[D];南方医科大学;2009年
2 李斌;结直肠癌患者就诊延迟分析[D];中南大学;2009年
3 叶建杰;慈溪市结直肠癌危险因素病例对照研究[D];浙江大学;2008年
4 赵波;结直肠癌危险因素及临床流行病学特征的调查与分析[D];广西医科大学;2013年
5 崔娟娟;p53和nm23在结直肠癌中的表达及其临床意义[D];河北联合大学;2014年
6 宋青芳;正常肠道、癌前病变、结直肠癌相关微生物组学比较分析[D];昆明理工大学;2015年
7 郭秀燕;结直肠癌术后生存分析[D];泰山医学院;2014年
8 王静;TL1A在结肠炎相关结直肠癌动物模型中作用的初步探讨[D];河北医科大学;2015年
9 吴哲;Th17细胞在TL1A调控结肠炎相关结直肠癌中作用的初步研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年
10 肖华旭;通过microRNA-155下调SOCS-1在结直肠癌的表达促进其转移和侵袭[D];川北医学院;2015年
,本文编号:2120699
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2120699.html