shRNA干扰沉默hARD1后对5-FU诱导大肠癌细胞凋亡的影响研究
[Abstract]:Objective: To study the effect of recombinant plasmid hARDl-shRNA on the apoptosis of human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells induced by 5--Fu on the cell level of human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line SW620, and to provide some experimental evidence for the treatment of colorectal cancer with targeted molecular therapy combined with chemotherapy and the influence of chemotherapy sensitivity factors. In order to provide the basis for further study of hARD1, methods: 1, SW620, shCON-SW620, hARD 1-shRNA-SW620 of human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line were cultured.2, and the transfection rate of pENTRTM/U6-hARDl-shRNA-SW620 in cell line was stable. Experimental group: experimental group: hARDl-shRNA stably transfected with SW620 cells. Negative control group: empty plasmid transfected SW620 fine. Cell. Blank control group: SW620 cells 3, MTT method detected the effect of three experimental groups on 5-Fu sensitivity respectively 4, flow cytometry Annexin V/PI double staining method to detect cell early apoptosis 5, flow cytometry PI single staining method to detect cell cycle changes 6, Western blot detected the expression of]hARDl protein in colorectal adenocarcinoma after 5-Fu action 7, Q-PCR detection The expression of hARDl mRNA in colorectal adenocarcinoma after 5-Fu action: 1, the culture of SW620, shCON-SW620, hARDl-shRNA-SW620 in the human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line. In vitro culture, successful and well grown.2, stability and transfection rate of pENTRTM/U6-hARDl-shRNA-SW620 stable transfection cell line: shRNA-ARDl SW620 culture 48h on hARDl The inhibition rate of expression was 54.8%.3. The effect of three experimental groups on the sensitivity of 5-Fu was detected by MTT method: the growth of each time segment (0,12,24,48,72h) cells were observed with different concentrations of 5-Fu (0,1, 10,20,401005001000 mu g/ml), the absorbance photometric value (o value), the tumor cell inhibition rate and the IC50.SPSS20.0 statistical software were calculated. The results of factor variance analysis showed that the tumor cell inhibition rate and the IC50 test group and the negative group were statistically significant (P0.05), and the difference was not statistically significant (P0.05) compared with the negative control group (P0.05). The median inhibitory concentration (IC50) was 344.953 + 28.539 mu g/ml in the experimental group and 798.383 + 86.59 g/ml in the negative group. The blank group was 735.338 + 36.530 g/ml4, and the flow cytometry Annexin V/PI double staining method was used to detect the early apoptosis of the cells. There was no significant difference in the apoptosis rate between the three groups without drug treatment: the experimental group and the negative control group, the difference was not statistically significant (P0.05). The comparison of the apoptosis rate after the treatment of low concentration 5-Fu (100 u g/ml): the experimental group was more empty. The apoptosis rate of cells in the white and negative groups increased statistically. After the treatment of high concentration of 5-Fu (500 u g/ml), the apoptosis rate of the cells in the experimental group was higher than that in the blank group and the negative group (P0.05). There was no significant difference between the blank group and the negative group (P0.05).5, and the flow cytometry PI single staining method was used to detect the cell cycle. The proportion of G0/G1 cells in the experimental group was higher than that in the negative group (P0.05). The proportion of GO/G1 cells in each group increased after the effect of low concentration (100ug/m1), and the proportion of the cells in the G0/G1 phase of the experimental group was higher than that of the negative group and the blank group (P0.05). The Sub-Gl of the experimental group was higher than the negative group and the blank group (P0.05). Sub-Gl was found under the action of 5-Fu high concentration (500ug/m1). Peak, G0/G1 phase cells in the experimental group were lower than that in the non drug group (P0.05), but there was no statistical difference between the experimental group and the negative control group and the blank control group (P0.05), and the proportion of the cells in the lower concentration and the non drug group increased significantly (P0.05). The Sub-Gl peak appeared, this was the sub G1 peak, and the proportion of the cells in the Sub-Gl phase was less than 5-Fu treatment and low concentration 5-Fu treatment. Shi Zenggao, the increase of the experimental group was higher than that of the negative group and the blank group, the difference was statistically significant P0.05).6, and Western blot was used to detect the expression of hARD1 protein in the colorectal adenocarcinoma cells after 5-Fu: the relative expression of hARDl protein in the three groups of cells was analyzed. The results showed that the difference between the experimental group and the control group 22 was statistically different. The difference between the blank group and the negative control group was not statistically significant (P0.05).7. The results of hARDl mRNA expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma cells after the 5-Fu action of 5-Fu showed that the mRNA expression level of hARDl, the experimental group and the negative group, the experimental group and the blank group were statistically significant (P0.05), the blank group and the negative control group were statistically significant (P0.05). The difference was not statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion: 1. shRNA silencing ARD1 gene can improve the sensitivity of 5-Fu in SW620 cells of colorectal adenocarcinoma, with chemotherapeutic sensitization,.2. shRNA silencing hARD1 gene can promote the apoptosis of colorectal cancer SW620 cells induced by chemotherapeutic drug 5-Fu, and the low concentration of shRNA SW620 cell cycle of colon cancer is blocked in G0/G1 phase, combined with high concentration of 5-Fu,.4. shRNA silencing ARD1 gene combined 5-Fu can downregulate the expression level of hARDl protein in colorectal adenocarcinoma cells,.5. shRNA silencing ARD1 gene combined 5-Fu can down regulate the expression level of colorectal adenocarcinoma cells
【学位授予单位】:昆明医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:R735.34
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高梅澾,薛东波,赵明,李爱东,吕洪光,李泮泉,刘淑德;83例大肠癌多药耐药基因的检测[J];中国现代医学杂志;2001年12期
2 李俊,曹桦,吴宁,孟红,汪永寿,陈玉祥,程雄;大肠癌术后复发与血管内皮细胞生长因子及其受体表达的关系[J];华西医学;2002年04期
3 杨磊,丁彦青,张进华;广东地区2 037例大肠癌临床病理分析[J];第一军医大学学报;2003年11期
4 黄宁霞,胡建群;大肠癌637例临床病理分析[J];九江医学;2003年01期
5 高梅澾,谢向臣,幺春艳,吕洪光;复发及多源发大肠癌多药耐药基因检测[J];大肠肛门病外科杂志;2004年04期
6 张茂;德力格尔图;;血管内皮生长因子与大肠癌的研究进展[J];内蒙古医学杂志;2007年09期
7 邵春红;卢志明;;大肠癌[J];山东医药;2008年48期
8 费伯健;吴露露;周士福;齐晓薇;;胰岛素样生长因子Ⅰ、胰岛素样生长因子Ⅰ受体在大肠癌中的表达及其意义[J];生物医学工程与临床;2009年06期
9 肖著军;许岸高;;白细胞介素-8与大肠癌关系的研究进展[J];广东医学;2012年22期
10 马鸿基;;大肠癌社会医学初探[J];中国社会医学;1989年05期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 郭善禹;杜宽航;卜文;;细胞外基质金属蛋白酶诱导因子在大肠癌中的表达意义[A];2001'全国肿瘤外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2001年
2 郑树;;我国大肠癌易感人群研究[A];面向21世纪的科技进步与社会经济发展(下册)[C];1999年
3 肖冰;王媛媛;张亚历;;大肠癌干细胞作用相关基因及信号通路的筛选鉴定[A];第二十三届全国中西医结合消化系统疾病学术会议暨消化疾病诊治进展学习班论文汇编[C];2011年
4 崔q辉;陈栋;杨振宇;;细胞粘附分子在大肠癌组织中表达及其临床意义[A];第十一次全国中西医结合大肠肛门病学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
5 郑树;蔡心涵;曹江;耿礼义;郑雷;张颜明;施正政;;人新的大肠癌负相关基因的研究[A];第六次全国大肠癌会议暨中日韩大肠癌会议论文汇编[C];1998年
6 耿敬姝;王艳颖;冯占军;赵玉兰;赵家宏;;大肠癌细胞增殖与P~(16)表达关系的研究[A];2000全国肿瘤学术大会论文集[C];2000年
7 雷雯;周锡庚;郁宝铭;陈晓耕;王清水;;血管内皮生长因子和血管生成与大肠癌发展的关系[A];2001'全国肿瘤外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2001年
8 丁杰;;血管内皮细胞生长因子与大肠癌治疗[A];2007年贵州省医学会外科分会学术年会论文汇编[C];2007年
9 申洪;;大肠癌组织结构的体视学诊断参数研究[A];首届粤港生物物理学术研讨会论文集[C];1999年
10 许红民;王强;白雪娟;钟定荣;曹秀堂;张金萍;丁彦青;姚开泰;;大肠癌差异表达基因的筛查[A];中华医学会病理学分会2005年学术年会论文汇编[C];2005年
相关重要报纸文章 前7条
1 记者 施嘉奇;抽点血,找出大肠癌早期线索[N];文汇报;2010年
2 记者 衣晓峰 靳万庆 通讯员 李晓丽;大肠癌多药耐药判断标准有新“尺度”[N];中国中医药报;2003年
3 何苗苗 蒋卓勤;饮食相关成分在大肠癌发生中的作用[N];中国中医药报;2003年
4 通讯员 方序 周炜 记者 宦建新;科学家发现大肠癌靶向细胞[N];科技日报;2014年
5 记者 张灿灿 特约记者 陆桂芳 通讯员 方序;加剧大肠癌进展关键细胞现形[N];健康报;2014年
6 记者 张乐;一种细胞会导致大肠癌肿瘤恶化[N];新华每日电讯;2014年
7 衣晓峰 李晓丽;肠癌多药耐药判断有新说[N];健康报;2003年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 刘阳;长链非编码RNA DANCR在大肠癌中的表达及其功能研究[D];山东大学;2016年
2 曹丹丹;基于二代测序技术的溃疡性结肠炎相关性大肠癌变异谱分析[D];中国科学院北京基因组研究所;2015年
3 邱云平;基于色谱质谱联用技术的大肠癌代谢组学研究[D];上海交通大学;2008年
4 冯晓莹;胰岛素样生长因子系统在大肠癌的表达及意义研究[D];大连医科大学;2007年
5 马怡茗;大肠癌发生发展及转移相关分子的筛选和生物学功能研究[D];中国协和医科大学;2010年
6 陈远光;人大肠癌组织蛋白质组二维凝胶电泳技术的建立及应用[D];中南大学;2003年
7 毕新宇;大肠癌病理学特征与预后的关系及硒蛋白-P在大肠癌组织中表达及其临床意义[D];中国协和医科大学;2004年
8 王媛媛;大肠癌干细胞基因表达谱特点及其信号通路的筛选鉴定[D];南方医科大学;2011年
9 叶霖;单酰基甘油脂肪酶在大肠癌中的作用及其作用机制的初步探讨[D];华中科技大学;2011年
10 龚磊;反义RNA技术下调多胺代谢关键酶抑制大肠癌细胞增殖及分子机理研究[D];山东大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 唐光明;p53及其上游基因ATM、下游基因PUMA在大肠癌中的表达及意义[D];川北医学院;2015年
2 王苗锋;大肠癌组织中VEGF、MIF的表达及临床意义[D];安徽医科大学;2015年
3 汝干;LncRNA-MALAT1与Hsa-miR-1互作机制对大肠癌放射敏感性的影响研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
4 王茜;细胞周期相关激酶在大肠癌组织中的表达及其意义[D];山东大学;2015年
5 张明谦;ANKRD18B基因在肺癌和大肠癌中的甲基化与表达分析[D];第三军医大学;2015年
6 赵硕;IDO在大肠癌组织中的表达及临床意义[D];滨州医学院;2014年
7 高丽萍;LEA、CDw75抗原在大肠癌中的表达及其临床意义[D];昆明医科大学;2015年
8 肉克彦·库达来提;维吾尔族与汉族大肠癌临床病理特征及hMLH1、hMSH2蛋白表达差异[D];新疆医科大学;2015年
9 胡金龙;自噬相关基因在大肠癌中的表达及意义的相关性研究[D];滨州医学院;2014年
10 李明;大肠癌中NRP2表达调控相关miRNA的预测及鉴定[D];滨州医学院;2014年
,本文编号:2125126
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2125126.html